Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What are my rights in this situation? Faulty Workmanship


russellhq
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4770 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently had a new floor put down in my flat (May '06) and it has subsequently developed a fault, see image below. The floor has started to rise along one section stopping me from closing the door.

image042do8.jpg

 

I phoned the company that fitted the floor and have been in email contact since. The last email asked that I get a joiner round to quote for fixing the floor because "to travel up from yorkshire would be very bad commerce". I live in Glasgow so approx. a 4 hour trip for him.

 

What are my rights regarding repair etc?

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're entitled to be satisfied, so do as they suggest - a local joiner may fix this for a small amount, and if your contractor pays this, there's no problem. Try to get a joiner that comes recommended. By the way, apart from the imperfection the floor looks lovely!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see from the photo that its a laminate floor and the reason its risen is because when it was laid, it was probably laid right up to the edge of the room at all sides. This type of flooring should have a gap for expansion round the edge, as it will expand and shrink depending on the temperature and weather conditions etc. Ideally it should have had a beading layed over the edge to hide the small gap around it or appropriate skirting board with edging, so I would check and explain to the fitters that, that appears to be the reason for the problem. Either way, if it can be relaid on the outer boards as its probably clipped together, board by board and the expense will be covered by the origional company, than apart from the inconvenience...the problem will be solved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's an 18mm solid oak floor, not laminate. As it's real wood it can suffer expansion problems from moisture. Essentially it's the same kinda problem. Not enough space to expand. So original company will have to pay/supply the material and the cost of a joiner to fix it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a second look again at the photo, I can see that the boards have been staggered the wrong way, which wont support the individual boards properly either. You generally lay full boards, but stagger at the beginning and maybe the end of the room, if they run out, or at least the first board on a new run, so to speak. It appears theyve cut short boards in the middle of the room which doesnt help either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Court action would mean raising the case in E&W and the attendant problems of cross-border litigation. Their suggestion of getting someone local to fix it DOES seem the most sensible, however, since THEY are in the business, why not get them to source a local contractor - this means there's no responsibility on the OP to pay additionally and try to get the costs repaid if they subsequently don't want to play ball.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...
Court action would mean raising the case in E&W and the attendant problems of cross-border litigation. Their suggestion of getting someone local to fix it DOES seem the most sensible, however, since THEY are in the business, why not get them to source a local contractor - this means there's no responsibility on the OP to pay additionally and try to get the costs repaid if they subsequently don't want to play ball.

 

------

 

It is probably a good idea to use a local contractor but the Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 does give a consumer the right to choose the jurisdiction, in case of emergency:

 

1. A consumer may bring proceedings against the other party to a contract either in the courts of the Member State in which that party is domiciled or in the courts for the place where the consumer is domiciled.
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...