Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • FINAL UPDATE.  I have not posted as the defence were reading the thread.  An agreement was reached on the day of the hearing.   I am unable to go into detail but for those in this position the forum has been priceless support and advice so thank you all in the site team.   for those going through this, follow the process, ignore intimidating tactics and threats and get to the Judge.  They are very supporting of those self representing.   I note her name has gone from the heading of the thread.  Was this them ?  Thanks again.  
    • I'm not sure what the "appeal" system asked but he said he definitely didn't indicate he was the driver so I'm just going to have to take his word for it. Honestly, I don't think the hirer will contact them. I think my brother will tolerate it. I did have a similar experience with another company 6-7 years ago and sought advice on here then to which you guys told me to ignore, I got the exact same DRP letters and then a "Gladstones Solicitor" letter.  After that nothing happened and it died away. Based on my experience with that I assumed the same would happen here but only asked to see if perhaps anything had changed since then.    Hopefully it doesn't get to court but if it did, I feel like we have enough evidence to sway a judge who probably hates dealing with this type of nonsense anyway. Or maybe I'm too optimistic. 
    • Your attachment showing the cinema parking restrictions seems crystal clear. Let's see what the photos turn up.
    • Meter certification periods re given in The Meters (Certification) Regulations 1998, Schedule 4. From there you can check if they are correct about your specific meter .. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/1566/schedule/4 If they're telling porkies then you have e clear grounds to tell them to take  hike. If they're correct or if you haven't been able to confirm then you have  few options. You could just keep fobbing them off. In general Octopus can't keep up with demand for smart meters. It took 9 months to get our. So they may not push too hard. Or ask if you can install your own choice of meter. The Electricity Act 1989 cover this in Schedule 7 (2) and (2A) https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/29/schedule/7 Or fight the them and their enforcement. Or go off supply.
    • We received a copy of the completed Directions Questionnaire (N181) from the solicitors along with a draft copy of their directions. I am on a course today so can upload over the weekend if needed. By 4pm on 16th May both parties must each give standard disclosure of documents by way of list by category. By 4pm on 30th May any request for inspection or copies of docs must be made and compiled 14 days thereafter. I will provide more over the weekend.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Football


Guest
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2106 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

the prem league kicks off with a win for the Arse, no knives out yet for Wenger...

 

and the transfer sagas; Barca doing to Lfc what Lfc are doing to Soton, Lfc fans will be happy if van Dijk joins. ah the hyprocisy... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Celtic beat Partick Thistle 1-0, a win for the Jambos at Killie tomorrow Ford :)

 

The new stands coming on ford.....

 

http://img.pixady.com/2017/08/673592_206646644885453348293755582343435911758577n.jpg

 

http://img.pixady.com/2017/08/543039_206640284885452948293796336699783365268448n.jpg

 

That's my old school at the end.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

not if randall plays :)

 

:madgrin:

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

:madgrin:

only kidding, he'll 'come good...

 

your stadia looks good. but, you might have to wait a bit longer for the seats if it all kicks off in n korea...:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

:madgrin:

can Lfc have him back, they still need some half decent defenders (despite having a whole summer to sort things out) :)

at least Chelski lost

Link to post
Share on other sites

can Lfc have him back, they still need some half decent defenders (despite having a whole summer to sort things out) :)

at least Chelski lost

 

I was told he wasn't to clever today, we still managed to win 1-0 though :)

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

no matter. he's prob doing better than what Lfc is currently using...:)

 

Here's what the Hearts fans thought...

 

http://www.hmfckickback.co.uk/index.php?/topic/171548-randall/

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's what the Hearts fans thought...

 

http://www.hmfckickback.co.uk/index.php?/topic/171548-randall/

where are you playing him, he's a (central) defender foremost.

imo, as mentioned before, i think he's out on loan up for sale.

but, atm, he's prob better than what lfc are currently using. :) did you see Lfc's defending today.

no wonder Lfc are in for van Dijk. doing the same to Soton as Barca are doing to Lfc re Coutinho. thats what i meant before about the hypocrisy of Lfc not letting C take a step up (for good money), but wanting van Dijk to take a step up (for good money to soton).

Link to post
Share on other sites

120m for coutinho! blimey, for that money, let him go. he wants to go and take a step up. just like lfc want van dijk to take a step up to lfc! ah, the hyprocisy.

he put in a transfer request after lfc continually said no, so there's no loss of face for lfc.

sort out the defensive issues (lfc are always going to score, even without coutinho (suarez)), it's been going on for years now. everyone knows, just stick a few balls into the box and lfc will concede.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Lfc spending 40m of Coutinwho money on a lame Ox with one year left on its contract? :-(

should've spent it + more instead on a decent defender(s) :), or at least give others a regular chance at the back (robertson, gomez for eg). the current defence isn't (and hasn't been for awhile) working, (being down to 10 is no excuse for that dire defensive display.), and Lfc will not win anything (apart from perhaps the league cup) with that defending, even with a good offence.

at least though they are still only 3 pts off the top lot :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hear the Judge in Mr Rooney's case said as Mr R earned so much there was not a sum for a fine which would impact on Mr R so no fine. Well if he earns £300k a week i'm sure we can come up with a sum which would impact and where do the fines go? I'm sure we all have ideas where it will do good.

 

To me this is a blatant unfair decision as if you are not incredibly wealthy you pay.

 

Is this a usual decision when dealing with wealthy law breakers?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hear the Judge in Mr Rooney's case said as Mr R earned so much there was not a sum for a fine which would impact on Mr R so no fine. Well if he earns £300k a week i'm sure we can come up with a sum which would impact and where do the fines go? I'm sure we all have ideas where it will do good.

 

To me this is a blatant unfair decision as if you are not incredibly wealthy you pay.

 

Is this a usual decision when dealing with wealthy law breakers?

possibly.

for someone who has money to burn, a fine (subject to the guidelines) prob won't be seen as enough.

community service seems a good alternative (in addition to the 2 yr ban), as long as its not an easy number...

eg, http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/what-wayne-rooney-community-service-13639374

Link to post
Share on other sites

Beaten by a 93rd minute goal, no luck at the moment Ford, in all honesty we're pretty bad, hopefully when we return to play games at Tynecastle, we should have about 7 home games on the bounce :)

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...