Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide


An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.

£19.99 + £1.50 (P&P)




Last Will and Testament Kit


Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.

£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

BAILIFFS - The Law and Your Rights

Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.

The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.

£13.95 + £2.00 (P&P)


Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg. 05783665 in the UK

reg. office:
923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE



+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    wendyandkeith Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    35

    wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    I sent off my DPA request 2nd October, it was signed for on 5th October... Today we received 2 seperate letters, 1 from woolwich and 1 from Barclaysicon... First letter from woolwich says that they are hoping to deal with my issues by 6th Nov. The 2nd from barclays wasnt quite as straight forward, the first part was, it just stated that they received it, that it was currently being handled by woolwich and returning our fee and doing the request on complimentary grounds, the 2nd part was very different...

    "As regards your mention of "manual intervention", the DPA does not oblige the Bank to comment about internal policies and procedures. Furthermore, in the context of managing day to day transactions arising from out of order accounts, the Bank does not hold the information you requested in a form that would be covered by the DPA. Whilst aggregated information is retained for statistical purposes, this would not constitute "personal dataicon" under the DPA and therefore would not be covered by a s.7 DPA Subject access requesticon. For the avoidance of doubt, the fact that we do not generally record information in a way that is caught by the


    Yours sincerely

    Peter Townsend"

    So who knows what its caught by? The letter is worded EXACTLY like that. So where do we go from here? Are they right or wrong? Do we just accept it or is there something we should do?

    Thanks

    Similar Threads:

  2. #2
    Niklowe
    Guest

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    They are using the same arguement that Abbeyicon are using, in that archived material on microfiche is not "a relevant filing system" under the data protection act. We are waiting for a ruling on this in the near future.

    However you can use what info on charges that you have at hand and make an estimated claim. The banks will have to get the info in order to contest a figure you have given.


  3. #3
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    wendyandkeith Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    What is meant my manual intervention anyway? So i can make a claim on the basis of any information they give me?


  4. #4
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    essjaysea Novitiate essjaysea Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    May 2006
    Posts
    308

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    The question about manual intervention is put to the bank in order to get them to admit one way or another, whether any manual intervention has in fact taken place.

    If they confirm that there has been no MI, then they are admitting by implication that all the charges have in fact been computer generated, and that the cost to them will have been approx 50p rather than the 30 pounds they have been charging.

    This information will support your claim that the charges are disproportionate, and therefore unlawful.

    But The Woolwich generally respond by saying that this information is not covered by the Data Protection Act, and refuse to give a definitive answer either way.

    My thoughts are that, as all of these cases have so far been settled prior to a hearing, there doesn't seem to be much point in challenging them on this.

    Preliminary Letter sent to Woolwich 05/06
    LBA sent 19/06
    Court claim filed 04/07 : Total £824.75
    Acknowledgement of Service 27/07
    Defence received 08/08
    AQ filed 11/08
    Barclays AQ filed 05/09
    Hearing date 20/12
    SETTLED IN FULL £840.49: 14/12/06

  5. #5
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    paddym Informative paddym Informative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    755

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    Wendy thats just a standard letter i recieved same myself just carry on with your claim as you intended to do nothing has changed !


  6. #6
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    e28bigalbexley Highly informative e28bigalbexley Highly informative e28bigalbexley Highly informative e28bigalbexley Highly informative e28bigalbexley Highly informative e28bigalbexley Highly informative e28bigalbexley's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    I am in
    Sidcup Kent
    Posts
    1,090

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    Me too i got the bog standard print out probably out of the same printer that does the "we will charge your account £35.00 on...."


  7. #7
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    sjc1985 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    133

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    Got a list of charges today, what do I send to the bank as a Breakdownicon of charges?

    03/10/06-Data Protection Act request sent via recorded delivery
    06/10/06- Letter signed for. 15th Nov cut off date.
    10/10/06- Statements come in tatty brown envelope.
    Will be claiming for £1946.22
    23/10/06- Preliminary request for £1946.22 sent recorded delivery.
    24/10/06-Letter signed for. 7th Nov cut off.
    08/11/06- Standard letter received wanting more time.

    23/03/07- Time up for NatWest to say whether defending or not.
    19/03/07- Acknowledgement of service and saying was going to defend came through.
    04/04/07- Deadline for Natwests defence.
    03/04/07- Defence filed came through.
    05/05/07- Letter from Court to say claim stayed until 27/06/07
    25/06/07- Letter from court, claim stayed until further notice.

  8. #8
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    frenchieboy Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    77

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    Ditto we received it as well, just carried on with lbaicon


  9. #9
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    wendyandkeith Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    The entry "sjc1985" was us, our daughter hadnt signed out of hers, on the first preliminary letter it states that a Breakdownicon of charges is included, what is a breakdown of charges and how do I do it?


  10. #10
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    e28bigalbexley Highly informative e28bigalbexley Highly informative e28bigalbexley Highly informative e28bigalbexley Highly informative e28bigalbexley Highly informative e28bigalbexley Highly informative e28bigalbexley's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    I am in
    Sidcup Kent
    Posts
    1,090

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    Hi
    you need to go through all you statements and find each charge and then go into the bank templates libary and use the spreadsheet as instructed, DO NOT use the 8% sheet on page 2 (labeled 8%) until you go to court.
    Moreover read through the various threads concerning the woolwich, if your not sure I would spend the weekend at least reading the FAQS ect, until you feel able to continue. People will always help but alot of the groundwork needs to be done by yourselves.
    In the end its very satisfying.

    Alan.:grin:


  11. #11
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    wendyandkeith Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    We have read through the faq's were just a bit unsure as to what exactly a schedule of charges needs to be... would a plain list with dates and amounts do?


  12. #12
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    essjaysea Novitiate essjaysea Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    May 2006
    Posts
    308

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    Basically the schedule of charges is a list showing the details of the charge, the amount and the date applied to the account.

    Preliminary Letter sent to Woolwich 05/06
    LBA sent 19/06
    Court claim filed 04/07 : Total £824.75
    Acknowledgement of Service 27/07
    Defence received 08/08
    AQ filed 11/08
    Barclays AQ filed 05/09
    Hearing date 20/12
    SETTLED IN FULL £840.49: 14/12/06

  13. #13
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    wendyandkeith Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    So would it be suitable to re-send what they sent me? They sent me a list date by date of every charge applied to my account... I read somewhere about a spreadsheet, does it have to be done on a spreadsheet?


  14. #14
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    essjaysea Novitiate essjaysea Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    May 2006
    Posts
    308

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    No, you dont have to use the spreadsheet, but it is a useful tool, as it works out the 8% statutory interesticon that you can apply when you file your court claim. Try the link below

    http://www.CAG-files.co.uk/barracad/...arges-calc.xls

    Preliminary Letter sent to Woolwich 05/06
    LBA sent 19/06
    Court claim filed 04/07 : Total £824.75
    Acknowledgement of Service 27/07
    Defence received 08/08
    AQ filed 11/08
    Barclays AQ filed 05/09
    Hearing date 20/12
    SETTLED IN FULL £840.49: 14/12/06

  15. #15
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    wendyandkeith Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    35

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    So what is my best option? to put into a spreadsheet now and keep the spreadsheet for when I have to apply for the 8%? Sorry if seem bit thick but dont know what were doing even though we have read the faq's etc


  16. #16
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    sparklydayz Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    48

    Default Re: wendy and keith v The Woolwich

    Just enter the amounts etc into the spreadsheet but ignore the interesticon bit. When you come to file your court claim you can then fill in the interest column.



Browsealoud
Video Tour



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE