Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
    • Thousands of Chinese companies are making synthetic opioids and shipping them around the world.View the full article
    • Are these the important pages I need to upload ? 1.  pages 1-4 are court form 10a 2.  2 pages of the CCA agreement  3.  Default notice from NewDay, 22/02/20 4.   Lowell letter stating they own debt ,     Dated 16/11/20 5. Unheaded letter also dated 16/11/20 from NewDay saying they assigned “all of the respective rights etc,”  to Lowell on 23/10/20 I make this 9 relevant pages from what I can see   ( all other pages are statements/default notes and lots of FCA info sheets) just needing your confirmation in advance as I don’t want to send over pages that are not required thank you  UCM      
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC OD DEBT Marlin got Marstions to doorstep me now Cabot/Restons


Creole
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2678 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have just got a letter from marston they apparently hand delivered it.

So they came to my house .

 

but i have NEVER received any court papers from any court.

 

The debt is from marlin financial and originally from HSBC many years ago.

 

What should I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just got a letter from marston they apparently hand delivered it. So they came to my house . but i have NEVER received any court papers from any court. The debt is from marlin financial and originally from HSBC many years ago. What should I do?

 

 

Hi Creole,

 

I have started a new thread for you.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for starting this.

 

Just to add some more info.

 

I have been recieving lots of threatogram letters from Marlin Financial Services for the past year, but have ignored them as this debt is old.

 

The last letter I received states that they will refer my account to a licenced field agent who will visit my home.

I have NOT received any court papers to say they have taken me to court.

 

I have been reading the advice given on the other thread and if I were to fill in form N244 or something like that,

I have no information of the court to put in the form.

 

I will be sending an SAR request in the morning to both Marlin and marston and find out if Marlin have the legal right to collect this debt.

 

Any advice please??

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt is over 10 years old, BUT I stopped paying about a year ago after getting into difficulties

The debt is £1233

An unpaid overdraft

I can't remember when I last communicated with HSBC, but a long time ago. They sold it to Metropolitan, who I was paying £5 a month

 

I have NEVER communicated with Marlin, I've kept most of their letters, but NEVER got any court papers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't scan, but this is what it says:

 

 

MY name and address

 

 

Marston Group, an appoved Enforcement Agency has been instructed by Marlin Financial Services to meet with you to discuss the current arrears on your account.

 

Marlin Financial Services has attempted to contact you, but you have failed to make contact and put forward reasonable repayment proposals to address your account.

 

If our client does not hear from you I will visit you again within the next few days. The purpose of the visit will be to discuss your account and your payment proposals.

 

TO AVOID THIS ACTION IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT YOU CONTACT OUR CLIENT IMMENTELY ON RECEIPT OF THIS LETTER.

 

Please call Marlin Financial Services immendiately on 03331239999 to discuss your account.

 

The letter was NOT signed.

 

Just Marston Gropu LTD Field Agent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I was thinking that as well. I will check my credit in the morning - which I highly doubt. But can they really do this?

 

I will be sending the letters in the morning.

 

My question is, do I put my address on the letter requesting the debt agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Providing you are sure there is no CCJ then ask to be moved to the Debt Collection Forum for further advice on what to do. If you do have a CCJ then shout loud here and we'll try to help.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I need some advice on a letter I've drafted for the Marston Group who visited my house yesterday.

 

I initially posted it on the baillifs area, but was advice to post here

 

 

 

I want to send Marston this letter, what do you think please?

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Account Ref xxxx

 

I have noted your attempt of an unlawful visit to my home. Please be advised I will only communicate with you or your agents in writing. This visit has been duly logged by time and date.

 

Should it be your intention to re-arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make such an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v Sheppard & Short Ltd [1959] 2 QB 384. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and, if you do so, you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

Your faithfully

I will not be signing it.

 

Also, I will be sending MArlin a CCA request.

 

Grateful for any advice, thanks

Edited by ims21
Link to old thread removed as not now needed
Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO ignore.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

its getting near xmas, the baiiff trade must be poor

 

s o the poor buggers must try and suppliment their failing bailff trade by trying to spoof people

into paying debts they do not ever owe by cleverly intimating they are bailiffs on a civil debt.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then no CCA correct .

 

your old man did correct with the marston in their DCA shoes.

 

no powers at all!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Just recieved a letter today from MArlin after I sent them a CCA request, they've said the debt is not from a credit card and is not regulated under The Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Is that right?

 

 

Half right. the overdraft would be regulated under the 74 act, although some parts don't apply. I read somewhere that there are problems for them if they don't reply to that effect if you CCA them - along the lines that all of the 74 act applies if they don't reply correctly. Possibly interesting times ahead ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...