Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Fredrickson International & Bryan Carter Solicitors


potter2
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4153 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

As i am new to this forum and not really clued up on a pc i was wondering if anyone could give me some advice?

 

I recived a letter from FI asking me to contact them if i was the person the letter was addressed to.

 

I totally ignored their request

but then a few days later recieved another letter stating that they were acting for their client Capital One to which i owed a sum of money

and this sum of money needed to be paid within the next seven days or bailiffs would calling to take belongings up to the value of the sum owed

 

I took some advice from my boss at work who was a help and he got me to send a prove it letter to both their PO Box Address & their reg address in London

which i then did by recorded delivery as he suggested.

 

I still have not had a reply from FI.

 

I have now recieved a letter from Bryan Carter Solicitors Stating that full payment must be made within 14 days

or they will recommend that thier client take proceedings without further notice.

 

Can anyone tell me if the advice my boss gave was good advice or not, and what should my next steps be?

 

Any help or advice would be greatfully recieved.

Thanks in advance

 

Mitch

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Welcome to CAG,

 

Ok did you have a Cap1 account? If so when did you last make a payment to that account.?

 

Freds have a portfolio of debts that are statute barred or nearly so.

Now you need to check your credit reference files, Equifax and Experian (Credit Expert) have free30 day trials, there is also Noddle which is free but not as relaible.

 

Carter is a solicitor for rent used by a few DCAs bluster and threats, for bailiffs to be instructed Arrow would have had to have obtained a CCJ and you would have to have failed to comply with the judgement order.

Give the information requested and I can draft a letter for you.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brigadier.

Ty for you reply.

 

Sorry it has taken so long to reply but i can only use a pc at work and i work funny shifts.

 

info you requested is yes i did have a Cap1 account and i made my last payment in March 2012

 

I have now received another letter from Fredrickson International which reads as follows

 

Thank you for your letter dated ***** the contents of which we note.

 

We confirm we are instucted as agents by Cap1 and this debt relates to an outstanding credit card owed to them under the card number *************.

 

We note that you have already admitted liability for this debt as you last made a payment in March 2012 direct to our client.

 

If you reqoire copy documentation you can request this direct from our client at the following address (blah blah blah)

 

As we have no record of a valid dispute in this matter and we have clarified our position and that of our client

we look forward to hearing from you with your payment proposals and we are instructed to continue to pursue the outstanding balance.

 

First of all i am not saying that the debt is not mine and that i do intend to pay as much as i can afford on a monthly basis,

but i cant understand how they managed to get my address as i have moved twice since March.

 

I have recently (and still going through) as messy marriage break up along with all the debt and stress that that incurs.

 

I was giving my ex wife the money to pay this debt for me (because i didnt want anyone knowing my new address)

and now this has come to light that she aint paid a penny and been using it for her own means Grrrrrrrrrrrrr.

 

Now having to start a new life on my own

my money is stretched with renting a place to live, bills & maintainance (3 young children) ect

i have verry little of my sallary left and i am paying bits to most of my creditors.

 

Can you give any advice or help in dealing with these people?

And or what to do next.

 

i am living in lodgings and fear any bailiffs calling possibly render me homeless.

 

Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated

 

Thanking you in advance

 

A very stressed out potter2

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi p2

 

firstly lets burst one bubble

 

DCA'd are NOT BAILIFFS

 

they never EVER will be

 

and until a DCA OWNS a debt [which freddies DON't]

 

they can do NOTHING to you.

 

only the OWNER can take you to court

 

if then you fail to pay the CCJ

 

only THEN can baillifs get involved

 

and they will be COURT BAILIFFS - and NEVER a DCA

 

even with COURT PAPERS - no DCA has ANY magical powers.

 

right thats that done...

 

can you get your cra file please

 

see below

noddle is free

 

can you list your debts please

 

and make sure they all show on the CRA file.

 

as for freccies/carter

 

for the minute

 

hang fire.

 

though if you've not got ALL the cap1 statements

 

it might be an idea to SAR them [cap1] to get them

 

lets see if you have PPI or PENALTY charges

 

dx

  • Confused 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hold and click on the black underlined SAR

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...