Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Creation Car finance agreement - dealer forged my sig, was cabot now lowells chasing


angelai
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2521 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am looking for some advice/opinions...

 

In January 2011 I purchased a car with finance provided by creation.

The price of the car was £2995, I paid a cash deposit of £800.

I was made aware of charges/fees totalling £450 (ish), which would be added to the finance agreement.

 

All was going fine until around 6 months ago, when a change of bank account led me to registering for online account management (so that I could arrange continuing payments).

 

The amount outstanding didn't appear to be correct so I contacted the company and requested all of the relevant figures.

It turned out that the set-up/admin fees had been added twice,

the representative I spoke to said that the dealer was wrong to add these fees at the point of sale as they are always added afterwards.

 

A rather in-depth conversation led to me being informed that creation don't actually hold any physical paperwork, and that they would be unable to amend the loan amount without notification from the dealer.

 

After some detective work I managed to locate the dealer

(who had now leased his forecourt to someone else, but I found him in the end!).

 

I explained the situation, and asked for a copy of our original sales document.

A week of telephone calls and me harrassing him brought no joy.

 

He told me that all of his paperwork was in storage and that he'd been unable to locate the document.

Well, of course he couldn't find it

- it would prove that he had actually received £450 more than he should have from creation, which they would obviously want back!

For me, the actual cost of the £450 would be much greater due to the associated interest.

 

Fortunately,

I did find my copy of the sales document, and emailed creation again,

informing them that I had a physical, SIGNED document showing the correct amount.

 

I explained that I would be happy to send them a COPY, not the original

- this was all the proof I had, it wasn't going to be lost in the post!

They did not reply.

 

On to the more pressing concern now...

during all of this I noticed that creation had the wrong registration number for the vehicle.

 

I informed them of this, without giving them the correct number.

Again, they were unable to amend the details without verification from the dealer.

 

I sent a final email informing them that this needed to be corrected (as did the loan amount) as I was hoping to sell the vehicle, with their permission of course.

 

I was hoping that this would set alarm bells ringing for them

- the vehicle did technically belong to them.

No joy.

 

after a couple more months,

it became apparent that the car was going to need a lot of money spent on it

- which I didn't have.

 

I did a hpi check and, surprise, it showed no outstanding finance.

So I traded it for another car at a local dealership.

 

I now find myself in no position to continue with repayments

- I am just setting up a debt managemnt plan,

and have just been visited by bailiffs

and had to agree a repayment plan with them

(which I can't afford, but will have to find if I want to keep my possessions obviously!).

 

I am in this position through my own actions

- I was earning a good salary until a year ago but had to give up the job.

This really is no-one's fault but my own.

 

My question is this - what can creation do to me?

I no longer have the car so they can't repossess it.

 

Actually, I NEVER had the car with the registration number they hold,

although the make and model are correct.

 

I am willing to come to some arrangement with them if they will accept a much reduced payment,

my concern is that they won't accept it and I have sold a car which didn't belong to me

. But then, it didn't belong to them either maybe?

 

I know I shouldn't have sold the car, but in my defence I did inform them of the mistakes with the agreement.

The only document I have ever signed is the original purchase order with the dealer (which he can't find).

 

Any ideas?!

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hi, can someone please help - I don't know what steps I should take next:

 

I sent a CCA request regarding an old agreement.

A copy of the 'original' agreement has arrived today

- with a forged signature!

It is most definitely NOT my signature, although it is a good attempt.

 

I never signed a credit agreement, that is why I sent the CCA request.

 

There are other issues

- the registration number of the vehicle I bought is incorrect,

as is the purchase price

- both issues were reported to the finance company at the time.

 

At this point, though,

I am more concerned with the fact that someone has had the audacity to forge my signature!

 

There must be a process I need to follow,

but I have no idea where to start.

Can anyone point me in the right direction?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

merged with you old thread from 2012.

 

so the dealer forged your sig then,

this must be close to being SB'd too!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so what prompted the sending of the CCA request

 

 

have cabot been sending threat-o-grams then?

 

 

tell us what has happened between your 1st post and today that has prompted you to CCA?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The account is now with Lowells Solicitors

- they sent a 'final notice before court action' type letter..

. There may have been many other letters which were never opened (head buried in sand moments).

 

I haven't been paying this debt,

and I haven't acknowledged it.

 

 

Because of the issues with the account

(as my original post - incorrect details, no satisfactory response from Creation regarding these details)

I just didn't pay it

- I know that's not the best course of action,

but I've had many other things to worry about over the last 5 years.

 

I think the problem was always the cowboy that sold me the car.

He was more than a little surprised when I found him in 2012!

Funnily enough, I've seen a FB post very recently about him, and it wasn't a good review.

 

In summary

- I am in possession of the original purchase order,

showing the correct vehicle registration number and purchase price.

 

 

I have not made a payment on this account since 2012

(according to the statement I received today

- I'm sure it was longer ago than that, though).

 

 

I have not opened any letters about this account for years

- but that's not to say I didn't get any.

 

 

I am angry that I seem to have been 'done', and yes,

I'm trying to not pay it for that reason.

 

 

The CCA request was made because I KNEW they did not hold a signed agreement,

because I never signed one,

and I need to show I have tried to resolve this before it goes to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like the OP paid until about feb 2012 [1st post]

 

 

dx

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and you did the very best thing by not paying!!

 

pers i'd let this run

 

if you do get a claimform

then comeback here.

if casbot has sold it to lowells.

 

that means its definitely a lemon debt.

 

cabot are bottom feeders

Lowell don't usually deal in debts cabot has had

so i'd sit on your hand

which might have been a better thing to do

unless you've moved since you took this out

then the CCA was a good Idea as they now have the correct address

and cant get a backdoor CCJ.

 

the fact that its fraud and you have proof will KILL any court claim dead.

 

don't worry

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your input, it is appreciated!

 

Yes, I have moved - and changed my name (first name by deed poll, surname by marriage). Letters are still addressed in my old name. They found me somehow - not sure how? I had already changed my name by the time I moved...

 

Do I need to do anything about this fraudulent signature? Should I respond, pointing that out? Report it somewhere?

Link to post
Share on other sites

now go read post 10

 

 

as long as you've CCA'd from your current address you do nothing more

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...