Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, do the section 75 chargeback to your credit card provider.
    • See what dx thinks but it seems to me that sending a photo of your own pass isn't relevant to what happened. Let's wait and see what he says. HB
    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Claimform from 'Blake Lapthorn' /Arrow Global old Mint debt **STAYED**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2606 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

It's been a long time since i've posted here, as I've heard very little from various DCAs after they failed to produce CCAs for various accounts.

 

In May, i'm looking forward to defaults getting removed from my credit report and finally starting with a clean slate... or so I thought.

 

At the end of last week I received a letter from Blake Lapthorn Solicitors, on behalf of Arrow Global Guernsey (so they use foul tactics to squeeze money from cheaply-purchased debts... then store the cash off shore? Classy). They claim I owe over £4k.

 

Before this letter arrived, I had never heard of Arrow Global.

 

 

The letter gives me seven days to stick over £4k in the post or they'll issue court proceedings.

 

 

After receiving the letter, I set up an Equifax report, to find that Arrow Global entered a default for this account at an old address in 2008.

As far as I can tell, it's an old Mint credit card that has been in dispute since 2008

(dodgy cca and non-response to full sar, the ICO and FOS were involved).

 

 

However, this account defaulted back in 2006,

meaning Arrow Global have incorrectly added the default (and effectively given me 8 years worth of default in the process).

 

I'm usually pretty good at seeing DCAs and their Solicitors off,

however I can't find anything in CAG re: Blake Lapthorn.

 

 

I have read a few threads that show Arrow sneaking CCJs through with help from Bryan Carter,

so I'm trying to establish if I should write a prove it letter to them (ready to go but not posted just yet),

or to file under 'ignore' like so many of these letters before.

 

 

The manipulation of my credit report has realy got my back up, mind.:mad2:

 

I don't have a copy of the original default (there might be one in the garage if I search extensively),

however the default was definitely May 2006 as I went into a DMP at that time.

The only creditor that dragged out the default was MBNA.

 

So, CAG, what should I do next?

 

Thanks in advance for your help...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 167
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Update:

just dug the old SAR out from the garage.

 

 

As noted, I complained to the FOS and ICO as it was incomplete (the FOS actually gave them a slap on the wrist,

which means they must have done something wrong,

 

 

i've found the FOS to be useless in most circumstances).

 

 

they sent me statements and copies of a few of (but not all) letters I had sent to them.

 

 

The SAR was disputed as no CCA (there was aa cheeky letter saying it will arrive 'under separate cover', but it never did),

and no default notice were included,

so I would need to track down a copy of the original default somehow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi all,

 

I've just received a claim form from Bryan Carter for an old mint card. THe form has actually arrived at my father's house, so I won't be reading it until a little later.

 

THe claim amount is somewhere in the region of £4100.

 

A few weeks ago, I found that Arrow Global had actually added n incorrect default to my credit file - the card to which this pertains should have fallen from my credit file two months ago, so I mad a complaint.

 

I've received a standard 'we're looking into it' letter from arrow, and now a court claim! Cheeky b*st*rds.

 

The account has been in dispute for years due to lack of CCA and, later on a lack of SAR.

 

I've never had to deal with a CCJ... what do I need to do?

 

kind regards

 

Danson79

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Danson

 

When did you last make a payment or acknowledge the debt?

 

Once you get the paperwork, I would advise you acknowledge the claim online and send CCA request to Original lender and CPR request to BC.

 

Hi, thanks for the quick response

 

I have the document in my hands now. Slight error, the claim is from Arrow and Blake lapthorn.

 

Cca has been outstanding for years, and as noted above the account shouldn't even be on my credit file anymore - this is their response!

 

I was paying via cccs until some time in 2007, when they didn't have a valid cca.

 

The account has been bounced around for years, despite fos and ico complaints and no forthcoming documents.

 

I wish to defend, I've had trouble with debt for years and this was supposed to be the month I could finally start with a clean slate :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Finally got a chance to sit down and concentrate on the paperwork.

 

First of all, my complaint response re: arrow global, despite being full of inaccuracies, does state:

"In the meantime, your account will remain on hold".

The letter is dated 31st August, 4 days before the issue of the bulk county claim form.

 

Next up, the claim form itself:

 

POC:

 

The claimants claim is for the sum of 4109.10 being monies due etc etc...

 

The claimant claims the sum of 4109.10 together with the costs of the claim (court fee £85 & Solicitor's costs £80). Then it has the date of 31st August (when the account was supposedly on hold?

 

The document was sent from Blake Lapthorn on behalf of Arrow Global.

 

I am about to acknowledge my defence via moneyclaim, if anyone can help me out I would appreciate it as I'm feeling out of my depth with this.

 

D79

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Stella, I had a Google (as I was unsure what it meant tbh) but I left the box unchecked.

 

Acknowledgement of service complete.

 

What next? Sar to Mint or Arrow? CCA to Mint or Arrow? And how do I even begin the CPR letter to Blake Lapthorn?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks stella,

 

I would really like the original default as I don't have a copy. I joined a DMP in 2006, all of my creditors defaulted their accounts with me then.

 

If it turns out the Mint didn't default until 2008, is that contestable in itself, considering I was on the DMP? Are there timelines regarding when an account should be defaulted? I had to cut my card up and send it back etc, so it would be odd if the account didn't default until two years after the DMP.

 

Where does Arrow's letter from the 31st August that clearly states 'the account is on hold' come into it? Surely that's strange practice, to tell me it's on hold and then issue a claim?

 

Also, Arrow's letter claims RBS have 'no record' of any CCA and SAR requests. I have records of all of my letters to and from them, and I even had a complaint go through via ICO due to lack of complete SAR and the STILL didn't send me the rest of the required info.

 

I'll get all of the letters off in the morning. If they don't respond am I able to request more time from the court to build my defence?

 

Sorry about all of the questions, I have a lot of experience with the CCA request side but I've avoided court claims so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the only reason for a SAR would be the default notice (and that comes under the CPR) i won't send a SAR to mint for now.

 

Should I write to Arrow Global at this stage? Even if it's just to point out the account is supposed to be on hold due to a complaint?

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR rules you would request under 61 (1-2-3) no charge on that request, others I am sure will comment also, so wait and see, Default notices it has been said in a lot of cases copies are not held just a marker stating one sent, DJs accept that on many occasions it seems, but if you had one keep it safe, as if incorrect they you have ammo, as I did in court.

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have the default doc, however I entered a dmp in 2006 - all of my accounts should have defaulted around that time. I remember it well, only MBNA wouldn't 'play ball' at the time, so they were the last to default (hence them being the last to fall from my credit report at the end of this month)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Due to printer woes, i'll have to wait until tomorrow to print and send the sar - does the usual time scale apply and do I get an extension to make mt defence if the documents are late or incomplete?

 

Thanks for the help so far, much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to get ahead of myself, but can arrow get into any kind of trouble for 'holding' my account (as per their letter) then issuing court proceedings anyway? Should I be making a formal complaint (although technically i'm inthe middle of one with them anyway?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can use it as part of your defence yes, as they are well known for doing that.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...