Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pension Credit £212 overpayment?


Surfer01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have been directed here by HB13. Thanks.

We are having a bit of a hassle with my wife's occupational pension. Up to a week ago my wife received SSP but that has stopped so no income from her employer however she shoudl be on ESA.

Up to now her pension was deducted from her SSP but obviously that cannot happen now.

We have tried to pay a lump sum (4 weeks) up front but require a receipt for the DWP so that our benfits can be adjusted. Employer says that they cannot accept a payment fro various reasons. Pension company state it needs to come from employer so in a catch 22 situation. We do not want the policy to lapse through no payment.

Employer has stated that they will continue to pay their contribution but this premium is directly related to the amount my wife pays in every month so this has left us very puzzled. We also have had an issue with the financial advisor that was suippose to be helping us but that will be on anothe thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sorry, surfer01, they aren't usually the same.

 

Are you able to tell us what Standard Life [who are usually a good company] said to you about why they didn't want to accept contributions from the employer?

 

Sometimes an employee can take over a policy like a GPP but not an occupational scheme. It depends what type it is.

 

Can you tell us more please?

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Standard Life said it needs to be done through the payroll office so that the contribution does nto get lost. Real quandry over this one as the wife does not want the pension to lapse.

 

I understand you don't want the pension to be lost. If it's with Standard Life, it may not be an occupational one, but it could still be employer sponsored. I don't want to bore you with the rules, but pensions are riddled with them. Have Standard Life told you the best way not to let the pension lapse?

 

Maybe if you wanted to tell me the name of the pension scheme [without the employer's name if that's part of the title] I can have a look online and find out what it is.

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

PM sent with more details. Hopefully that info will give you more info on how to keep up the group plan. I think the HR department in the company are being difficult, but not sure how to approach it so that payments are kept up to date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks got it and replied. We had a financial adviser appointed by GMB but the toad sat on our documents since early march and we only got them back yesterday despite numerous phone calls. Guess what, no advice given and not so much as even a covering note. I am not sure if the HR department have a permanent adviser or one appointed by SL but will try and find out tomorrow..

Link to post
Share on other sites

The company owes my spouse about three weeks vacation and there is no ways my spouse will be able to use this vacation time it so they have decided in their infinite wisdom that they will use this to pay her portion of the pension subscription. There would be enough to cover her contribution for another 26 weeks. We have no objection to this as it seems a good idea and we don't have to travel to pay them or have cheques floating around when you are trying to mange your finances on a low income, but we have concerns regarding our current benefits.

As an example lets assume that her pension contribution payment should be £25 per week. However as she is on ESA and I am on Pension credit, we are not sure how this may impact our benefits and whether it would be classed as income. I am under the assumption that DWP class half of this pension contribution as income.

We certainly do not want to fall foul of DWP regs and be tagged as benefit cheats and hit with a repayment sum of £12 x 26 weeks. The wife should be getting wage slips showing an income payment of £25 and then the deduction payment of the same amount which in effect is an income of £12.50 for DWP purposes. This may be one for Erika but I am not sure how to flag it up for her attention

Link to post
Share on other sites

If her employer owes her this money for annual leave she arranges with them for it to be used toward her occupational pension instead, any claim to income based benefit will likely be treated as if she has the money, and the benefit claim reduced accordingly - if the benefit claim is income based. For ESA, Antone would be the best person to advise on this aspect.

 

If the ESA claim is contribution based, this shouldn't affect it.

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, I clicked through on this thread a few days ago and then didn't actually have the time to post.

 

I'm afraid I genuinely don't know the answer to this one (it's quite unusual), and I no longer have access to the JCP guidance to figure it out, which is what I would normally have done when I worked there. Erika is correct that contribution based ESA wouldn't be affected by this, but if Mrs Surfer01 gets income related ESA it could be an issue.

 

If you haven't yet had a satisfactory answer to this question, there are a few people I could ask for advice - DMs who currently work there. Please let me know and I'll send an email or two.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

Apologies for the long winded post but we are very stressed and worried. I am on Pension credit and my wife is on ESA Higher rate due to ATOS medical and being now unemployed. On each change of circumstances we have contacted the Pension Service in writing to update them. Our last correspondence was to advise them that my wife's employment had been terminated on 20th May 2011 as she had been off on the sick for over a year.

We then received a letter in June from the Pension Service requesting my wife's payslips. I then phoned the Pension Service and advised them verbally that my wife was no longer employed therefore payslips were not available and had not been available for several months. This was accepted.

We then got a long letter from them showing a breakdown of my Pension Credit payments and this indicated that I had been underpaid for about 4 months. The letter was dated 6th July and received on 15th July 2011, but in the meantime £727 had been deposited into my account. At first I assumed this was arrears plus one weeks normal payment. Then I received a letter advising that they had paid in 6 weeks in advance my Pension Credit. All it stated on the letter was that a payment would be made into my bank for the period 7th July until 17th August, no other explanation.

When no pension credit was paid in on the 20th July I queried it again with the Pension Service and was told that there had been a clerical error, but the money was an arrears payment. I then tried to work it out but the arrears was less than £400 and the figures did not gel so I phoned them back on 21st and 22nd to be told on both occasions that it was arrears money.

I phoned again today and initially was told it was arrears money, but when I was insistent on a breakdown I was told that I had been paid my pension 6 weeks in advance, but at a lower rate than I was entitled to due to the clerical error. As this had me quite concerned, I then used http://www.entitledto.co.uk to see what sort of figures came up and it seems that although we had supplied all the correct information in writing they may have miscalculated and they had been overpaying me by about £30 per week for six weeks and then by £21 for the period 7th July until 17th August.

We cannot afford not to have any weekly income at all after the 17th August as we have not budgeted beyond that period. I appreciate that the "entitledto" calculator could be slightly out, but not by much.

We are convinced that we have done everything correctly and that they have made the mistake as on several occasions when phoning the Pension service they have admitted making a clerical error. Can they still penalise us if they have made an "official mistake" or error? I know they can't on Housing and council Tax but not sure about Pension Credits. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

I have been receiving PC for awhile with adjustment for wife being on ESA etc. When wife stopped claiming we notified them of a change of circumtances for my pension to be upped. The PC was increased, but they never took into consideration that my wife was entitled to carer's allowance, but not in payment. Again we notified them and they paid us arrears.

However a week later we got what we thought was an arrears payment and basically spent it. The following week in addition to my regular PC payment which was on a Wednesday, on the Thursday we had another payment of £212. We then contacted the DWP Pensions to query this and they were unable to explain the extra payment, but said they would look into it.

The following week we had another payment for £212 and by this time we were quite worried so contacted DWP again to query it and again they were unable to tell us why we were getting the extra amount. By this time the additional amounts paid had amounted to over £636.

When discussing the issue with the rep from the DWP I noticed that the amount was exactly the same amount that was paid to me as pension when they had not taken into account my wife's carer's allowance. We were the ones notifying the DWP and also asking them to stop paying us the extra money as we now felt we were not entitled to it, but the answer was that as they did not know, they could not stop the payments!

It now seems that one department is paying us Pension Credit on the Wednesday and another is paying us Pension credit on the Thursday. We have always been paid PC on the Wednesday which is why we thought it was an arrears payment initially when we received a payment on the Thursday.

We have held onto some of the money, but are now concerned that when they discover their mistake, they will be clawing back the overpayment at a rate we cannot afford even though they had made an "official mistake"! Also it is very difficult controlling the temptation to spend it on something useful as the first lot we spent at the vet sorting out our cat.

Not sure what more we can do or what we should do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

We are on Pension credit and receive £237 per week for the both of us which also takes into account two small private pension payments and a carer's allowance. However in addition the DWP pay us another £212 for some unknown reason?

Over the past 5 weeks since the DWP started paying us this extra £212 per week we have phoned in and queried it as we feel we are not entitled to the money. Every week they tell us that we are entitled to the benefit, but cannot explain why we are entitled to the money. It is not a housing and council tax payment as that would be a lot less anyway.

We never applied for any other benefit at any time. We have also written to the DWP querying the payment, but it still gets paid into our account and they have sent us nothing in writing.

Initially we thought we were entitled to the money and spent it as there were some arrears owed to us by the DWP, however over the past 4 weeks we have now being putting it aside. It is becoming difficult to manage as it all goes into the same account as the Pension Credit and DLA.

We are scared of spending it just in case they demand it all back again which will leave us short every week. Can any one advise what we should do as this seems to be an official mistake that no one at the DWP wants to rectify? Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

does it come with your usual money, or is it paid in seperately?

 

Pension credit is paid on Wednesday and the £212 is paid weekly on the Thursday. We have never received any letter stating why we are being paid the amount despite requesting the reason by phone and also in writing.

Luckily we have proof of this as one letter was sent by registered mail and the other by normal mail. The phone calls have been logged as when I phone and query it, I get the reply that they can see the notes from the previous week etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...