Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Order for Possession - FORTHWITH


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4285 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Section 10 = tock the box for attached witness statement, then have a look at this guide http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?325527-CAG-guide-Are-you-facing-eviction-or-repossession you will see examples of how to set out a witness statement to go with an N244. Anything you are affixing to back up your statement should be given an Appendix number and referenced in the statement.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm confused Ell-enn,

 

Half the guides I read suggest ticking either 'the statement of case' or 'the evidence set out in the box below'.

 

Surely it's best to tick 'statement of case' - which is my defence - then write 'see documents attached' in the box below?

 

I don't have an awful lot to write as the documents I will be attaching are, in effect, my case.

 

 

Space Cadet UK:

 

The letting agent have told me they will not discuss my tenancy and that I should speak direct with the landlord - an offshore company with a mailbox address! The phone number I have been given is never answered. Judging by the fact I have had no contact with them in any form since signing the tenancy, they must have received my payments!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, well don't panic, if it is simple rent payments that are alleged to be missing, and you have concrete proof that you made these payments to the LL, then it will very easily be sorted out.

 

I see Ell-enn has responded regarding help with the N244 - she's absolutely fabulous with assisting people with that (I don't do paperwork), so make sure you follow her instructions properly.

 

You must make a set aside application - and not a stay application. The PO, according to you, should never have been made because you do not owe any rent.

 

I am always quite surprised when court clerks' give their opinions about legal issues - none of them are qualified to do so, and generally have no clue what is what. It is in no way, shape or form, unusual for a warrant of execution to be filed immediately following a forthwith possession order - in fact, it is the usual course of action, otherwise there is no point to a forthwith order. Don't worry about that though - it's largely irrelevant as your set aside application will automatically stay the warrant.

 

Your evidence should be reasonably straightforward. I think I listed the points in an earlier post. You did not receive the paperwork, you do not have rent arrears (provide the bank statements), and you believe the court would not have made the order it made if you had been present.

 

What area of the country are you in?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in the South East. From everything I have read and the opinions given today, this seems to be a no-brainer. I certainly hope the Judge sees it that way.

 

Can I please get some clarification though vis-a-vis Section 10. One Solicitor I spoke with today told me categorically NOT to tick 'witness statement' and to select 'statement of case', then attach my rebuttal and supporting documents as per your earlier advice Lea.

 

I really don't want to make a mistake and lose this appeal on a technicality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not an appeal - you are asking the judge to set aside the decision made on 7th May.

 

On the facts presented, the forthwith order would never have been made if you had been present at the hearing and if you had provided evidence that the rent had been paid. Your biggest issue is if they state that the payment details you have are not their details.

 

You require a witness statement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, and to be on the safe side, you should include a request to the judge to suspend the warrant until your case has been heard...some courts will do this automatically, others will not, so to cover all the bases, make the request in your application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi All, I have been going through the courts to gain possession of a room in a house from a non paying tennant, i had my court hearing yesterday and the defendant did not show up (he tried to adjourn hearing but his application was refused as he did not file a defence) anyway the judge gave me possession order and have received an "order for Possession Forthwith upon service of this order upon the defendant" does this mean i can start immediately to apply to the court for a baliff ? if so how long does this procedure take? Will the defendant be able to appeal and do you think he has any chance of success? any help appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...