Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Emusic.com Keeps Charging my bank card


Teddybear154
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3689 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I don't know if I am posting this in the right place. I hope so. Has any one heard of e music.com. I have just checked my bank statement today and noticed a transaction for this company for £9.99. On further inspection I have discovered they have been taking £9.99 every month for about a year. I had not noticed before now. I have done a google search of this company ad they seem to be a music subscription company. I never signed up to this company. I don't even listen to music so I don't know how they have got my bank card details. I have been on there website and the only contact details they have is a American phone number or a web form you can fill out to email them. I am not too keen to phone America as it will probably cost me a fortune and can't fill in web form as they ask for email address used to register which I don't know as never signed up for this company. What Can I do to stop this company taking more money. I don't particularly want to have to cancel my bank card as I have alot of bills set up and paid with this card and it will be a nightmare having to phone every where. but will if have too. Does any one know any other contact details for this company. Also Is there any Chance I can get my money back. As it totals over £100 which is alot of money. Whats the best way if any to go about getting my money back.

 

Any advice much appreciated

 

Thanks In advance :x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

I think this is the UK address.

 

 

London

eMusic

PO Box 6400

London

W1A 8AW

England

 

Write to them, Mark it for the attention of the Customer Complaints Manager and send it by recorded signed for delivery

Contact your bank and ask them to block any requests for payment from that company

Gbarbm

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Sorry to rake up a old thread but I'm still having problems with this company EMUSIC. I have sent so many letters to the address stated above and any other address I have found and haven't had one reply. I have tried emailing them hundreds of times as they have now changed there online contact system but again have had no replies I have phoned the American telephone number and have spent a fortune on phone calls just to be told no one can help me.

I have contacted my bank and have asked them to block payments from this company many times but the company still manages to take money.

 

I have cancelled and changed my bank card twice and still they manage to take money. I just don't understand it and don't know how to stop it.

 

Is there any way to stop it they have now taken over £300.

 

My bank just don't seem to care. I'm with lloyds

 

Any advice would be much appreciated

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very odd especially if they have taken money after you changed your card, I would of thought this was impossible, is the money perhaps being taken by a DD instead ?

 

I'd demand that Lloyds take more action, that you have not signed upto anything and that it is fraud, get the police involved if you have to.

 

If you genuinelly have not signed up for this and they have a UK presecence it shouldnt be too hard to reclaim the money via the courts, but I suspect it isnt as simple as this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very odd especially if they have taken money after you changed your card, I would of thought this was impossible, is the money perhaps being taken by a DD instead ?

 

 

It's not impossible as the instruction was given prior to the card being changed. The thing to do is to contact the card provider and ask to stop the continuous payment authority. If no original authority was given then an action to recover the payments via the fraud route should be undertaken.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Teddy

 

Write a Formal Letter of Complaint, mark it as such. Explain what's happened, how they have let you down and what you want them to do.

 

Send it to:

Ms Alison Brittain

Head of Retail Banking

Lloyds Banking Group

[email protected]

 

Provide as much detail as possible, e-mails sent etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not impossible as the instruction was given prior to the card being changed. The thing to do is to contact the card provider and ask to stop the continuous payment authority. If no original authority was given then an action to recover the payments via the fraud route should be undertaken.

 

But how would the company know the number and authorisation needed to charge the new card, would the bank supply them with the new info. or would they continue to pay out using the old card details ?, then what would be the point in stopping an old card in the event of theft or loss if money can continue to be taken from it ?

 

Or does a continuos payment authority overide all of this ? Even then, surely a customer can stop it.

 

Odd

Link to post
Share on other sites

But how would the company know the number and authorisation needed to charge the new card, would the bank supply them with the new info. or would they continue to pay out using the old card details ?, then what would be the point in stopping an old card in the event of theft or loss if money can continue to be taken from it ?

 

Or does a continuos payment authority overide all of this ? Even then, surely a customer can stop it.

 

Odd

 

They would continue using the old card. Hence the need for the cancelation of the CPA. Bear in mind that the assumption here is that the authorisation was given in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies. I have never signed up to this company. I had never even heard of the company before I saw it on bank statement so I definitely never gave my authorisation for them to take money. I will send a letter of complaint to Allison Brittan as you suggest. To see if she can help stop this. I have copies of all letters and emails I have sent to emusic and lloyds regarding this matter.

Hopefully this should help me with getting my money back.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let us know what happens, if Lloyds don't act, then you can lodge a complaint with the FOS, but you need to get a Final answer from Lloyds first.

 

Thanks for your replies. I have never signed up to this company. I had never even heard of the company before I saw it on bank statement so I definitely never gave my authorisation for them to take money. I will send a letter of complaint to Allison Brittan as you suggest. To see if she can help stop this. I have copies of all letters and emails I have sent to emusic and lloyds regarding this matter.

Hopefully this should help me with getting my money back.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • dx100uk changed the title to Emusic.com Keeps Charging my bank card
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...