Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How long does it take DM to make Decision ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4368 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm still waiting since February, after sending in the GL24, from getting Nil points in my IB to ESA Migration, I'm still on the assessment rate, still sending in Med Certs, can anyone say if this means I'm going to Tribunal or can it take this long for a DM to make contact.

 

When I called DWP call centre they have no idea where I stand, just say keep sending in Med Certs, I only want to know will I hear from a DM, or is it done deal and I'm going for Tribunal hearing, it's been hell not knowing anything.

 

Is this the norm for people, the DWP site states during the process once you submit the GL24 you will hear from the DM if they been able to overturn the ATOS points, but I've had no definite details from them, just the usual letter saying they will pay assessment rate till my appeal is looked at.

 

thanks for reading, just feeling so ill with worrying

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a backlog with reconsiderations but I wouldn't think the backlog is that big! So in my opinion I think the decision has not been changed by the DM and your claim has been referred to the Tribunal, and the Tribunal can be approx 6 months before it is heard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appealed via the GL24 in February, the DWP phoned me about six weeks later asking if I still wished to go ahead with the appeal, I said yes and the paperwork from the DWP arrived four weeks later, and the paperwork from the tribunal service a couple of weeks after that, My appeal hearing is not before 01/10/2012.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies, I'm worried as it does seem to me I would have had something by now, but when I called them they said I will hear from the DM in due course, they could not tell me if I was being sent to Tribunal or not as it does not show on their system. I'm going to phone again, I just want to get an answer as to what the DM's decision is, not just left in limbo, I thought they had to tell you not just send you to Tribunal without letting you know their decision first.

 

Osdset you say you had a call from them, that's what I mean, I've not heard a thing.

 

 

 

thanks again for your help guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

cocoriver,

Just a thought, did you state that you wanted to appeal on the GL24, or ask for a reconsideration?

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi osdset, I'm not sure because I was told by DWP to go into Jobcentre for help and the GL24 was filled out by the man I saw there, he then faxed it on to the correct dept, I had no idea there was a difference, I was just told to send in a GL24 within one month of getting nil points letter, they don't offer information so if you don't no what to do it's a mine field.

I'm going to phone on Tuesday and try to find out, thanks for taking time to read my post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi osdset, I'm not sure because I was told by DWP to go into Jobcentre for help and the GL24 was filled out by the man I saw there, he then faxed it on to the correct dept, I had no idea there was a difference, I was just told to send in a GL24 within one month of getting nil points letter, they don't offer information so if you don't no what to do it's a mine field.

I'm going to phone on Tuesday and try to find out, thanks for taking time to read my post

 

Hmm, personally I would not have let someone else fill out the GL24, I take it you did not see what was written, for an appeal you normally state why you disagree with the DWP's decision, and ask for it to go to appeal.

 

I have no experience with claims migration but I know that in the case of a new claim for ESA, if a reconsideration is asked for benefits stop until the decision is made, you are still getting paid so I'm guessing he has requested an appeal.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem was when I got the letter saying I had nil points, I phoned DWP and they suggested they make an appointment for me at Jobcentre where someone would help with the forms, as it has never happened to me before I was unsure of the process. I did see the GL24 as he asked me what I'd like to be put on the form as my reasons for appeal, basically that I disagreed with the ATOS medical, Nil points etc, so that's basically what he put on the form, then faxed it off, a couple of weeks later I got a letter saying it had been received, and they would look at the decision and if it could be changed they would let me know, then I got a letter saying I would be paid assessment rate until decision on my appeal had been made.

 

I phoned and ask did that mean I was being passed to tribunal but was told, as it was not showing on the system they could not tell me, but I should hear from a DM in due course, just to keep sending med certs, that's it, nothing since then. Now in May, and very worried indeed.

 

thanks again for taking the time to read my posts

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so as others have said, it looks very much like the reconsideration has been done, the DM did not change the decision in your favour, so it has gone to the Tribunal. That's not great, but not a disaster either as the Tribunals do regularly find in favour of ESA claimants.

 

You may wish to read Site Team member Honeybee13's excellent sticky thread (the threads that appear in a kind of nasty greenish colour at the top of the forum) for more information about the appeals process.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Antone, yes very much looks to be that way, I realize now I never fully understood what was happening, I was waiting to hear from the DM and now think I already have, going by the letter they sent back in Feb. But when I called them to clarify either way they would not say if I was going to Tribunal as they just kept telling me it did not show on the system that I was, so it could go either way, seems to me the DM did not change the decision back in February and I've been waiting for Tribunal papers all this time without even knowing it.

 

It's just ever y thing I've read, ie DWP link to the Appeals process, states you will hear from the DM, so I stupidly thought I'd get another letter or phone call.

 

I feel really stressed that I failed to understand what was happening, it's really upset me. I don't know if I'll be able to attend the Tribunal but as everyone says, it's better to go.

 

Thanks again for your help everyone, and best of luck to you all

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

 

just a thought here, have you when you have rung the dwp about this ever been offered a call back from the decision makers? If not ring and request one. They will be able to tell you whether or not it is going to tribunal.

 

Also have you seen a copy of the assessment report that would help you emensely in your appeal arguing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

here is what I got told regarding the delays etc.

 

the time the appeal/letter is recieved by sorting office is recorded so they use that date to decide if you appealed on time, however fromt hat point it can easily be many weeks before a DM looks at it. Most likely your appeal is sitting in a pile waiting to be looked at, once my last appeal was looked at the DM made a decision the same day.

 

As I understand it you will know if they submitted to trbunal because when they do that you have to be sent a copy of the documents related to the case.

 

It seems the DWP have issues communicating via letters and too many people are just left waiting in silence.

 

Asking for a callback from the BDC in my experience speeds things up. As they usually will look for your stuff first before ringing you back.

 

I rememebr ringing up been told by the call centre staff not to worry as the tribunal service has delays, and I pushed to find out the DM hadnt even got to it yet. I knew from past experience of tribunals I would get documentation when it gets submitted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes I've made several calls, mostly to the call centre staff, with different responses, ranging from it takes months for appeals to be looked at, to no your not necessarily going to tribunal yet, I had one call back with regard to being asked to send in a follow on med cert, I call to say it had been done but the call centre said it had not arrived so they gave me a call back, the lady that called me just took the details of the med cert and said she would update it there and then, but had no other information for me.

 

My last call, Tuesday this week, I was again told, nothing on the system saying I was going to Tribunal, can take months to be looked at and could go either way, but most people do have to go to Tribunal, just wait.

 

I may call again next week, and ask for a call back

 

thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...