Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How long does it take DM to make Decision ?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4363 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm still waiting since February, after sending in the GL24, from getting Nil points in my IB to ESA Migration, I'm still on the assessment rate, still sending in Med Certs, can anyone say if this means I'm going to Tribunal or can it take this long for a DM to make contact.

 

When I called DWP call centre they have no idea where I stand, just say keep sending in Med Certs, I only want to know will I hear from a DM, or is it done deal and I'm going for Tribunal hearing, it's been hell not knowing anything.

 

Is this the norm for people, the DWP site states during the process once you submit the GL24 you will hear from the DM if they been able to overturn the ATOS points, but I've had no definite details from them, just the usual letter saying they will pay assessment rate till my appeal is looked at.

 

thanks for reading, just feeling so ill with worrying

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a backlog with reconsiderations but I wouldn't think the backlog is that big! So in my opinion I think the decision has not been changed by the DM and your claim has been referred to the Tribunal, and the Tribunal can be approx 6 months before it is heard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I appealed via the GL24 in February, the DWP phoned me about six weeks later asking if I still wished to go ahead with the appeal, I said yes and the paperwork from the DWP arrived four weeks later, and the paperwork from the tribunal service a couple of weeks after that, My appeal hearing is not before 01/10/2012.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your replies, I'm worried as it does seem to me I would have had something by now, but when I called them they said I will hear from the DM in due course, they could not tell me if I was being sent to Tribunal or not as it does not show on their system. I'm going to phone again, I just want to get an answer as to what the DM's decision is, not just left in limbo, I thought they had to tell you not just send you to Tribunal without letting you know their decision first.

 

Osdset you say you had a call from them, that's what I mean, I've not heard a thing.

 

 

 

thanks again for your help guys

Link to post
Share on other sites

cocoriver,

Just a thought, did you state that you wanted to appeal on the GL24, or ask for a reconsideration?

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi osdset, I'm not sure because I was told by DWP to go into Jobcentre for help and the GL24 was filled out by the man I saw there, he then faxed it on to the correct dept, I had no idea there was a difference, I was just told to send in a GL24 within one month of getting nil points letter, they don't offer information so if you don't no what to do it's a mine field.

I'm going to phone on Tuesday and try to find out, thanks for taking time to read my post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi osdset, I'm not sure because I was told by DWP to go into Jobcentre for help and the GL24 was filled out by the man I saw there, he then faxed it on to the correct dept, I had no idea there was a difference, I was just told to send in a GL24 within one month of getting nil points letter, they don't offer information so if you don't no what to do it's a mine field.

I'm going to phone on Tuesday and try to find out, thanks for taking time to read my post

 

Hmm, personally I would not have let someone else fill out the GL24, I take it you did not see what was written, for an appeal you normally state why you disagree with the DWP's decision, and ask for it to go to appeal.

 

I have no experience with claims migration but I know that in the case of a new claim for ESA, if a reconsideration is asked for benefits stop until the decision is made, you are still getting paid so I'm guessing he has requested an appeal.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem was when I got the letter saying I had nil points, I phoned DWP and they suggested they make an appointment for me at Jobcentre where someone would help with the forms, as it has never happened to me before I was unsure of the process. I did see the GL24 as he asked me what I'd like to be put on the form as my reasons for appeal, basically that I disagreed with the ATOS medical, Nil points etc, so that's basically what he put on the form, then faxed it off, a couple of weeks later I got a letter saying it had been received, and they would look at the decision and if it could be changed they would let me know, then I got a letter saying I would be paid assessment rate until decision on my appeal had been made.

 

I phoned and ask did that mean I was being passed to tribunal but was told, as it was not showing on the system they could not tell me, but I should hear from a DM in due course, just to keep sending med certs, that's it, nothing since then. Now in May, and very worried indeed.

 

thanks again for taking the time to read my posts

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so as others have said, it looks very much like the reconsideration has been done, the DM did not change the decision in your favour, so it has gone to the Tribunal. That's not great, but not a disaster either as the Tribunals do regularly find in favour of ESA claimants.

 

You may wish to read Site Team member Honeybee13's excellent sticky thread (the threads that appear in a kind of nasty greenish colour at the top of the forum) for more information about the appeals process.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Antone, yes very much looks to be that way, I realize now I never fully understood what was happening, I was waiting to hear from the DM and now think I already have, going by the letter they sent back in Feb. But when I called them to clarify either way they would not say if I was going to Tribunal as they just kept telling me it did not show on the system that I was, so it could go either way, seems to me the DM did not change the decision back in February and I've been waiting for Tribunal papers all this time without even knowing it.

 

It's just ever y thing I've read, ie DWP link to the Appeals process, states you will hear from the DM, so I stupidly thought I'd get another letter or phone call.

 

I feel really stressed that I failed to understand what was happening, it's really upset me. I don't know if I'll be able to attend the Tribunal but as everyone says, it's better to go.

 

Thanks again for your help everyone, and best of luck to you all

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

 

just a thought here, have you when you have rung the dwp about this ever been offered a call back from the decision makers? If not ring and request one. They will be able to tell you whether or not it is going to tribunal.

 

Also have you seen a copy of the assessment report that would help you emensely in your appeal arguing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

here is what I got told regarding the delays etc.

 

the time the appeal/letter is recieved by sorting office is recorded so they use that date to decide if you appealed on time, however fromt hat point it can easily be many weeks before a DM looks at it. Most likely your appeal is sitting in a pile waiting to be looked at, once my last appeal was looked at the DM made a decision the same day.

 

As I understand it you will know if they submitted to trbunal because when they do that you have to be sent a copy of the documents related to the case.

 

It seems the DWP have issues communicating via letters and too many people are just left waiting in silence.

 

Asking for a callback from the BDC in my experience speeds things up. As they usually will look for your stuff first before ringing you back.

 

I rememebr ringing up been told by the call centre staff not to worry as the tribunal service has delays, and I pushed to find out the DM hadnt even got to it yet. I knew from past experience of tribunals I would get documentation when it gets submitted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, yes I've made several calls, mostly to the call centre staff, with different responses, ranging from it takes months for appeals to be looked at, to no your not necessarily going to tribunal yet, I had one call back with regard to being asked to send in a follow on med cert, I call to say it had been done but the call centre said it had not arrived so they gave me a call back, the lady that called me just took the details of the med cert and said she would update it there and then, but had no other information for me.

 

My last call, Tuesday this week, I was again told, nothing on the system saying I was going to Tribunal, can take months to be looked at and could go either way, but most people do have to go to Tribunal, just wait.

 

I may call again next week, and ask for a call back

 

thanks for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...