Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4379 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi

 

i am in need of desperate help as i have got home tonight to find a notice of seizure

 

nearly two years ago my i parked up my car on a street (my partner was with me at the time) behind another car, put my handbrake on and turned off the engine - there was probably about five feet between the cars - the car in front then started its engine, the reverse light came on and it started to reverse, my partner said " he isnt going to stop" and no sooner had he said that, the car reversed into the front of ours.

the driver got out, instantly inspected his car (there was minor damage) and turned to me and said " did you not see me parked there!" - i replied to him that we were already parked up before he started his engine and he wouldnt have any of it, despite the fact i had a witness to what he had done. we exchanged names, numbers and addresses.

 

he then rang me later on still insisting that i had run into him and he was contacting his insurance, my dilema at the time is that my insurance had lapsed as my partner was out of work and we living a hand to mouth existence. I did not tell the other driver this at any one time.

 

a few months later i received a visitor from his insurance company to clarify details etc and he saw the front end damage on my car and asked why i had not responded to any correspondence they had sent, i replied that as i was not at fault and he had lied to his insurance company about his claim i was having nothing to do with it as i wasnt at fault.

 

i fully admit to burying my head in the sand about all of this and should have come clean at the time but the thought of going to court and admitting that i wasnt insured was petrifying.

 

i realise now that i am going to have to seek legal advice and come clean but how do i stop them from taking goods from my property because the other driver in question has made a false claim on his insurance and lied through his back teeth to them?

 

i havnt told my partner about any of this as at the time he was gong through an absolute nightmare and i dint want to pile any more pressure on him.

 

please help me i am at my wits end

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this seizure of the vehicle for it being uninsured or

bailiffs collecting for fines, or a CCJ?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi BRIGADIER2JCS

 

am certain i havnt had a letter saying this was going to court so not sure if its a ccj - the letter states it is for judgement debt etc, so i take it from this that it has gone to court, but i have no recollection of ever receiving a letter telling me this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks like the "other party" has obtained a default judgment against you, were you aware of any court letters at all?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the notice of seizure is from the sherrifs office in croydon

 

In that case not only do you have a CCJ against you but it has now been transferred to the High Court for enforcement and initially will have been for more than £600, the person leaving the notice will have been a High Court Enforcement Officer. Do you have a sheet of paper with lots of writing on it?

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Check the Trustonline site it should give you details.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

i have three sheets of paper with lots of writing on them, i think there should have been more as it jumps points, but unfortunately my flamin dog went on a bender before i got home and i came home to find he had destroyed a pack of loo roll i had stupidly left in the hall but there was no signs of any other pieces of paper only these so i can only presume he has eaten them along with a good quantity of loo roll! of all the days he had to have a hissy fit today takes the biscuit! :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

On one of these sheets it may say words similar to:

 

High Court Form No 55 - Notice of Seizure

High Court Claim No: xxxxxxxxx

County Court Claim No: zzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Sent from ABCD County Court by Cerificate dated: 31/02/2199

Claimant: XYZ

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi plodderton

 

yes the dog managed not to eat that one

 

That is the important one. Any chance of resurrecting it? I believe the Brigadier has made a suggestion as to where to look for further info if you can't.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...