Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, do the section 75 chargeback to your credit card provider.
    • See what dx thinks but it seems to me that sending a photo of your own pass isn't relevant to what happened. Let's wait and see what he says. HB
    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

dwp chasing payment for 15 year old debt


pippie01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4392 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone I am new to this site,

 

I would be very grateful for some advice regarding 15 year old debt from DWP.

 

I received a letter ta the beginning of Feb 2012 demanding payment for old debt from 1997,

also said that i had been contacted before (but I haven't).

I have been in full time employment since then.

 

I contacted them to ask what the debt was for and was told it was a mistake when I was on income support from 1993-1997 which i would have to pay back.

 

I asked for all correspondance relating to the debt to be posted to me,

two weeks later i received letter stating what the debt was for ,

apparently i had appeal against the decision in 1997 through a solicitor and i have not receive anything since so thought my appeal had been accepted.

 

Now they have hit me with a hugh amount and are threating debt collectors if i don't pay.

 

Any advice please would be much appreciated

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for replying, they sent me a breakdown but from what i can remember it is not correct which is why i appealed it, I asked for all correspondance but they won't send me anything relating to the appeal, can i request that they send this, I only have a few days left to reply now and i have to fill in all my outgoings and send back to them.

I have asked them to take me to court so that i get to fight my own corner, but they said they can not do this but can send debt collectors.

Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Debt collector have no power whatsoever, you do not have to speak to a debt collector and you do not have to give him anything.

 

It's obviously not legally enforceable or they would be talking court, that is all they know, so you can play along with their little game or just ignore it and the following letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The debt is statute barred that's why they cannot take

you to court, but they are entitled to recover the debt

in another way if you at any time receive any further DWP

benefits including state pension deductions can be taken

from that benefit.

The DCAs the DWP use a heavily regulated and are subject

to the official secrets act in the same way as civil servants,

and the content of all letters sent is approved by the department.

(source Lord David Freud, Minister for Welfare Reform DWP.)

There is little that they can do to make you pay, but they won't

go away.

Make an offer if you like of a payment that you can easily afford.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

many thanks for the replies, i have offered them what i could afford and they won't accept this, they want treble what i have offered to pay, they have now sent a form for me to complete with my outgoings monthly, do i need to complete this form i do i just stick with the offer that i can afford i didn't think they could decide what i pay, but i am unsure.

 

Thanks again for your advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this DWP debt management handling this

or has it been passed to a debt collection agency?

 

You could send following to whichever organisation

is chasing it.

 

Dear Sir Or Madam,

Ref: xxxxxxx

I write in regard to the overpayment you state is owed by me,

I am fully aware that this ''debt'' is statute barred and court action

cannot be taken, if the debt is reffered to a debt collection agency

nothing changes and I will still only be able to offer to pay £xxxx.

Therefore I once again offer to pay £xx per month and the first payment

is enclosed herewith.

Send it recorded delivery.

I have sent this ona number of occasions for others.

  • Confused 1

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brigadier,

 

It is DWP Debt management, I will send letter recorded delivery today.

Can you just advice please as on the letter it says if it is passed on to civil proceedings this will add further costs to the amount owed and may affect future credit ratings, is this true i have worked really hard over the last 10 years get a fair credit status and cleared all debts over the years.

 

Thanks again its just frightening when you receive such mail 15 years later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a template letter designed to frighten, which is why I added

the para about Statute Barred debts.

They have already acknowledged that they can't take you to court

anyway.

AND they cannot report it to the CRAs anyway.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much Brigadier, you have just put a smile on my face for the first time in weeks.

I was so worried, i have never hidden from anything and always paid off debts but this was a shock!!!

Anyway great site and i will keep you all informed of responses i receive.

Thank you again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...