Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  (thus I don't know if the buyer would have ever proceeded). He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since (inc via new agent requested by lender). I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Landlord entering property without permission


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4243 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone.

 

It has recently come to my attention that the landlord entered the flat I am renting a) without my consent, he was showing potential new tennants around the flat so therefore he must have also opened my locked bedroom door, again without permission. b) he only gave me 3 hours notice, which was an answer phone message - not a direct call. Also, the voicemail was not left by him but by either his wife or a work associate. If it was a joint tennancy, would he only need permission by one tennant? I was not in the property at the time.

 

On one other occassion, a door was left open in the flat, either by my flatmate or by a worker - which once again I was never informed about.

 

As this is a breach of contract, would I be able to end my joint tennancy, (which is a year long) with immediate effect and would he be able to take me to court.

 

Thank you in advance for answers.

Edited by Armaghgeddon
Link to post
Share on other sites

You are renting a flat with others as a joint T?

 

Yes LL should have given 24hr Notice of impending visit, but any of your fellow joint Ts could have agreed, esp if they were likley to be in. IMO it does not require express permission of all joint Ts, esp if absent at time of visit. Neither does it matter who serves the Notice provided it was on instruction from LL. A door left open by person unknown? YGBJ!

IMO without evidence of LLs continued breach/unreasonable behaviour you do not have a case for summarily vacating T.

If it is a 12 month AST, how far in are you? Why is LL showing the property now? Is this a student let?

If you are still within fixed term the T can only be legally terminated by mutual consent or a Court Order.

What are other Ts opinions on LLs supposed single breach?

 

If you just want out, say so and we may be able to offer advice, but no one here can predict a Judge's decision with so few facts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do want out but my flatmate is also being difficult with me allowing a replacement tennant which the landlord agreed to. So this is the only way possible. As for the flat door being opened, it has happened three times in the past 5 weeks, on one occassion my flatmate blamed a builder and I happened to have left my rent in the kitchen for landlord.

 

Landlord entered property without permission as far as I am aware. The other tennant might have agreed, but I think he has entered the property on more than one ocassion. Builders/Painters have also entered the property without me even being informed. Many viewings have taken place since that first voicemail so I think he is helping himself to enter the property.

 

It is a student property, I have also been told that if he knocks the door three times and if there is no answer before entering then he is not breaking the law.

 

Would it matter if one tennant agreed but I didnt even by on the basis of bein given short notice?

Edited by Armaghgeddon
Link to post
Share on other sites

if no one is there who is going to hear him knock??

 

LL should be giving 24 hours for any visits being made unless it is for urgent repairs. Entering a locked room without prior 24 hr notice is a breach of contract, regardless whether he is showing potential tenants or not. Is this a private let through an agency?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if no one is there who is going to hear him knock??

 

LL should be giving 24 hours for any visits being made unless it is for urgent repairs. Entering a locked room without prior 24 hr notice is a breach of contract, regardless whether he is showing potential tenants or not. Is this a private let through an agency?

 

It is a private let. I can 100% prove that I did not give him any permission to enter property or enter my bedroom in either verbal or written forms. Although would it go against me for the very fact I did not reply to the answerphone message? And even if I did reply it was not enough notice?

 

The landlords wife or whoever she is states word for word when he will arrive at property and the voicemail time stamp supports that it is four hours before the time he was suppose to be doing the viewing. Could they claim they did not know about this particular law?

Edited by Armaghgeddon
Link to post
Share on other sites

It is ultimately LLs decision.

Do you have a joint T (all Ts named on one AST, or a single AST in your name, for room only + shared facilities?

 

When does the fixed term if a joint T?

LL has said that the tennant currently there has to agree, but as I said she is being judgemental/difficult on every tennant.

 

It is a joint tennancy agreement that was signed for a years contract, although I have also asked twice to look at the contract but no contract has been shown.

The tennancy is for shared facilities and room.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How far into the tennancy are you? you could always change the lock on your bedroom door? what are the reasons you want to end the tennancy early?
6 months into a 12 month contract. There are many reasons that I want to leave. The Landlord does not give enough notice to enter the property, they think half an hour is enough notice. While the landlord has said that I can find a replacement tennant, my flatmate keeps beng judegemental apart possible replacements by stating things like "They alook like they could cause trouble" or because she does not like the look of them - this is without even talking to them. On three seperate occassions I have went to enter the flat and the door has been left open, of course it isnt her fault it is always someone elses. While I have only spent 10 days living in the flat since August, my flatmate has managed to rack up a £160 electricity bill. While it is a joint tennancy and I am responsible for the bill also, I know for a fact that she uses an electric heater for her own personal use, and again she is being unreasonable about how much of the bill I have to pay. My girlfriend lives with 3 other people and her electic bill was £50! Furthermore, I do not have any receipts for paying rent, there was a rent book but it has mysteriously gone missing, and the landlord still has not given me a copy of my contract - sent him a text last night asking for a copy again.

 

 

One of the potential tennants said they wanted it, but then she turned around and said I want to talk to him first (she seen him in the flat and only said hello). I have all this stress and on top im in my last semester of university and I know I won't be able to afford the rent. So if it comes down to it, I might have to leave the flat and leave her liable for the rent. Uni comes first, im not wasting 3 years on this.

Edited by Armaghgeddon
Link to post
Share on other sites

You are saying that you wont be able to afford the rent but you knew what the rent was before taking on the tennancy. The issues with doors being left open is not sufficient reason to terminate a tenancy as I said change the lock on your bedroom door. If you leave the flat you will still be liable as it is a joint tenancy. as with the electric bill if it is in joint names you are both equally liable regardless of who has used the electric. It sounds as if you have personalitry issues with your other flatmate and sadly this is something that only you 2 can sort out. Did you read the agreement before signing it? To be fair I think you are commited to the full year but if you move out or get evicted for non payment of rent where will you go? do you already have an alternative place to live?

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You are saying that you wont be able to afford the rent but you knew what the rent was before taking on the tennancy. The issues with doors being left open is not sufficient reason to terminate a tenancy as I said change the lock on your bedroom door. If you leave the flat you will still be liable as it is a joint tenancy. as with the electric bill if it is in joint names you are both equally liable regardless of who has used the electric. It sounds as if you have personalitry issues with your other flatmate and sadly this is something that only you 2 can sort out. Did you read the agreement before signing it? To be fair I think you are commited to the full year but if you move out or get evicted for non payment of rent where will you go? do you already have an alternative place to live?

 

It has only just staretd to become a problem with the flatmate. I am staying with girlfriend pretty much all the time, she and her housemates have said if you need evidence that you are never there you can ask us. It was the fact I was wasting over £200 a month living there. Me and the flatmate has an argument about the electric bill, she thinks that it is only fair that I pay half of it. I was an electrician before university, and I warned her about the electricity billl if she continued using the electic heater. She suggested that I move out if I was not willing to contribute to the bill and I agreed. So asked the landlord if I could end the tennancy, he said no. I then asked what if I found a replacement. He said then you can get out of the agreement.

 

Over the past few weeks I have been looking for a replacement. She has disagreed with all but one tennant, who was on DHSS and the landlord said he did not accept it. So the search went on, another few people were interested but she said no to them. So one guy said he would like it the other day, but he said that he could not move in untill he sorted his last tennancy deposit out. He met my housemate breifly who just said hello and ignored him. She said she wanted to talk to him after the viewing - after blatantly ignoring him when he was there. I think he has lost interest in the flat now, and as I had a suitable tennant found it is not going to happen because of her unbeliveable ignorance.

 

As for getting evicted, thats not a problem but I have a guarantor but my mum wont be able to afford it. I do have an alternative place to live.

Edited by Armaghgeddon
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it is up to the landlord who he allows to take the tennancy on but if he wants the approval of the other tenant then thats up to him. I may be wrong but reading between the lines it seems like you rented this flat then regretted it because you are spending so much time at your girlfriends. The arguments over the electric bill are just that if you both are named on the bill you are both liable regardless of who used it. Going into your room is an issue but as I said change the lock, but if the LL cant get in he cant show anyone around. Your housemate may be unreasonable in your opinion but if she is going to share a house with someone else then it is only fair that she is comfortable with them, someone who you think is suitable may not be in her eyes. I really do think you will have to keep paying the rent whether you choose to spend time there or not.

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

OP states 'oxbridge style accom at peppercorn rent' so I assume not AST, poss accom 'tied' to employment or contractual T, so OP may need to read agreement closely re locks, but certainly unacceptable behaviour by College contractors. I might br inclined to go round to Dean's house, gain access and clean his internal windows/study, just to get his reaction on record! (not suggesting you break in, though)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...