Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CSL playing silly buggers


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4409 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just wondering if someone has an apt reply for me to send to these clowns. First of all, after many attempts I finally got them to stop calling. Now, despite me sending them an email telling them they are not to visit my property, they have replied with the following:

 

"Credit Solutions Limited offers a door step collection service whereby field agents visit a property to discuss repayment of an outstanding amount. This is simply another option available to our customers to assist them in repaying their debts. In relation to field visits in subsection 2.12 of Office of Fair Tradings guidelines doorstep visits must give adequate notice of time and date of visit. The Armstrong v Sheppard (1959) case you quoted is dependent on each individual circumstance and only such order to refuse access can come from a court and not from the individual"

 

Blah, blah, blah. Now I know this is utter drivel. I am just wondering if someone has something far more witty that I can send back to them in reply to these fools.

 

They have also chosen to ignore my offer of payment and how I would like to pay. I'm guessing it's because I offered them £1 a month (which I am entitled to do as I am on benefits at the moment) and wanted their bank details so I could set a standing order up. Ho-hum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Report them to the OFT, they are trying to confuse what is a straightforward case, you do not want them intruding in your home, they should back off.

 

I would go to Trading Standards as well... and maybe even your local MP might like to know how this company are abusing their position and the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi clemma

 

I send:

 

"I note your letter dated November xx 2011 that I received today and that I have filed and copied to regulatory authorities.

 

Both my dog and I have experience of doorsteppers and I have read your letter in full to my dog; whilst he would not normally respond to a disputed demand for £x he appears to be willing to make an exception in your case and should answer the door fully prepared; my dog is acting as my agent in this matter and all queries should be addressed to him c/o The Kennel at my usual address."

 

x

 

v

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi clemma

my dog is acting as my agent in this matter and all queries should be addressed to him c/o The Kennel at my usual address."

 

don't be surprised if your next letter from them is addressed:

The Dog

c/o The Kennel

etc

 

it has been known

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah that infamous line. I've shot a complaint off to the OFT and will send CSL another email telling them to shove it.....I have a cat who could be my agent, although people knocking at my door does tend to frighten him some what meaning they may not get a response from him. They are bumbling idiots (in my opinion).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Clemma,

 

If you are on benefits, then you should reduce your £1pm offer to £1p. In fact, I would just start paying them that regardless of what they think.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys

 

I couldn't remember who CSL were (I have so many card boxes full of billet douxs), and all I can quickly find is:

 

"Consumer Credit Act 1974 (the Act)

Complaint Against: Barclays Bank Plc t/a Barclaycard, Credit Solutions Limited & Power 2 Contact Ltd

Licence No: 005116, 300314 & 543806

 

I acknowledge your email, permission to disclose slip and attached documentation received on 4 February 2011, further to your earlier email, updating us about the problems you are still having with the above mentioned traders.

 

We will take into account the further information you have helpfully given us as we continue to monitor these traders fitness to hold credit licences.

 

Thank you once again for taking the time to write to us about this matter and giving us permission to disclose your complaint details."

 

To be fair to CSL and their 75p per letter solicitor, they buggered off quite quickly. There is no need to be frightened of these familiars.

 

x

 

v

 

Colleagues may notice that someone has p*ssed me off today :violin:

 

 

 

 

 

x

Edited by victoria_siempre
Forgot solcitor
Link to post
Share on other sites

That is negative MF

 

" In sooth, I know not why I am so sad: It wearies me; you say it wearies you; 4 But how I caught it, found it, or came by it, What stuff ’tis made of, whereof it is born, I am to learn; And such a want-wit sadness makes of me, 8 That I have much ado to know myself.

x

 

v

 

The b*stards are easily beaten

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh Fred, how I would love to pay them 1p a month. Unfortunately they don't seem to want to give me any details so I can pay them. No giro slips, no standing order details. I am not going to do as they tell me and set up a DD. I'm no fool :) I'm also disinclined to pay by debit card through their website. I don't trust them :roll: I've asked again for their details and explained my proposal and reasons for such a small amount. I am doubtful of a reply. At least I can prove I asked. I love email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

mind you, you should never try arguing with an idiot like a DCA, they'll simply drag you down to their level and beat you through their much greater experience.

 

I could never be at their level. They are so far below me it would take me 2 lifetimes of serious sin to get close to where they are. DCA's are easily beaten. I have done it before, I will do it again. Their experience is through bullying people who do not know their rights, intimidating those with threats of anything from bailiffs to stealing and selling your soul. They want to keep sending me letters full of drivel, that's their call. They want to keep ignoring my proposals for payment, so be it. I will not, sorry CAN not be intimidated by DCA's. But thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is negative MF

 

 

May I suggest you take a step back, go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page, and type HUMOUR in the search box.

 

Not everything on this site is meant to be taken literally, though many people will testify to the pointlessness of attempting to reason or explain something to a DCA, as clemma last post shows..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh Fred, how I would love to pay them 1p a month. Unfortunately they don't seem to want to give me any details so I can pay them. No giro slips, no standing order details. I am not going to do as they tell me and set up a DD. I'm no fool :) I'm also disinclined to pay by debit card through their website. I don't trust them :roll: I've asked again for their details and explained my proposal and reasons for such a small amount. I am doubtful of a reply. At least I can prove I asked. I love email.

 

Clemma,

 

How are you paying them at the moment then? - or aren't you? I'm sure if you asked for a direct debit mandate you could then use the details to set up a standing order.

 

Regards.

 

Fred

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

May I suggest you take a step back, go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page, and type HUMOUR in the search box.

 

Not everything on this site is meant to be taken literally, though many people will testify to the pointlessness of attempting to reason or explain something to a DCA, as clemma last post shows..

 

Yes indeed. I think you find that Victoria was being slightly sardonic. Your post was unnecessarily sarcastic to be honest, but I'll just sit back and enjoy the show from now on.

Before you criticise another man you should first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, when you criticise him, you'll be a mile away and he won't have any shoes on.

 

Don't get me confused with somebody knowledgeable by all those green blobs. I got most of them by making people laugh.

 

I am not European, I am English.

Link to post
Share on other sites

These are new, never before seen by me until I received a letter from Power2Contact telling me they were going to visit. Some Googling pointed me in the direction of CSL using Power2Contact as a "scary" guise. They have had nothing from me yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

. I will not, sorry CAN not be intimidated by DCA's. But thanks.

 

at no point have I said you could or would be beaten, I simply made the point that trying to have an intelligent discussion with them was doomed to failure, as was trying to reason with them or expecting them to be reasonable. I'm sure you'll find a tactic that suits you, and as there appears to be a slight touchiness about this thread, I won't share the way I saw them off, because that would probably prompt criticisms and disagreements about it, so the best of luck to you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the OH's debt and he does indeed owe the money. I have no qualms about that. They just have to realise that I will decide how much I will pay depending on what I can afford. They don't like that. People who know their rights are pretty much disliked by DCAs (one would expect). It's only for about £120, so not much anyway. I just found their attempt at trying to say they can visit me was laughable .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sun Tzu said: 'If you know the enemy and know yourself you need not fear the results of a hundred battles.'

 

 

 

 

Dear CSL

 

Please find enclosed a token payment of £x, which is the maximum I can afford.

 

Only a moron would fail to understand that it is pointless to demand more. I therefore look forward to your next letter.

 

Yours etc.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...