Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Humbug; they've even stopped the Christmas £10 bonus!


count orlok
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4104 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just got my award notice telling me what I will be getting to live on from April 2012. My ESA is going up from £99.85 to £105.05, but I won't be getting any more because the top up payment I also get to make up for the drop in income I got when changing from Invalidity Benefit to IB, is going down by the same amount.

 

And for the first week in December a Christmas Bonus of £0.00 will be paid.

 

I used to get £10 every Christmas, but I suppose they are looking for ways of funding tax cuts for those earning over £3000 a week. What fairer way of funding cuts for the best off than in true Tory fashion by taking money from the worst off?

 

I won't be sending DC or NC a Christmas card this year.

 

No sure if its being stopped for all the other qualifying benefits, or just Contribution based ESA. There is no mention of it on my wifes pension award letter, and not as yet had letters about my DLA and Carers Allowance.

 

Its bad enough the way they are treating the sick and disabled, but his is just mean. What's next on the agenda, special squads of "officers" on housing estates to take sweets of the children of single parents?

Link to post
Share on other sites

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/BenefitsTaxCreditsAndOtherSupport/On_a_low_income/DG_10018704

 

Christmas Bonus Who is eligible?

 

 

To get a Christmas Bonus you must be a resident in the UK, Channel Islands, Isle of Man, Gibraltar, any EEA country, or Switzerland. You must also be entitled to at least one of the following benefits in the qualifying week (normally the first full week of December):

 

  • Attendance Allowance
  • Carer's Allowance
  • Constant Attendance Allowance (paid under Industrial Injuries or War Pensions schemes)
  • Contribution-based Employment and Support Allowance (once the main phase of the benefit is entered after the first 13 weeks of claim)
  • Disability Living Allowance
  • Incapacity Benefit at the long-term rate
  • Industrial Death Benefit (for widows or widowers)
  • Mobility Supplement
  • Pension Credit - the guarantee element
  • State Pension (including Graduated Retirement Benefit)
  • Severe Disablement Allowance (transitionally protected)
  • Unemployability Supplement or Allowance (paid under Industrial Injuries or War Pensions schemes)
  • War Disablement Pension if over State Pension age
  • War Widow's Pension
  • Widowed Mother's Allowance
  • Widowed Parent's Allowance
  • Widow's Pension

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I looked that up to, but that would be what applies now (christmas 2011) and does not include the changes due in April 2012.

 

They do make mistakes though, I was told I hd been awarded DLA for Life and Dave said they would look after the most vulnarable in society.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I may have jumped the gun, but the way this government seem to be intent on destroying all that my father and grandfather fought for, I am always thinking the worst. it may be that I'm going to get it in relation to my DLA or CA, and not ESA, just that it seemed strange to make a point out of saying I would be getting £0.00 as a Christmas bonus.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay the way it was explained to me is that benefits are ranked. Highest ranked benefit pays the bonus.

 

In the game of Benefit Top Trumps ESA main phase (i.e. in WRAG/SG) trumps DLA. Whilst DLA beats ESA in assessment phases.

 

2010 I got a Christmas bonus paid by DLA.

 

Didn't get one this year so phoned up DLA. DLA told me that as I'm in main phase ESA it's they who pay it.

 

Called ESA who said no it hasn't been paid expect a call back.

 

ESA call back 1, No your not eligible as although you get both Conts and Income ESA it's the Income one that takes president so you will not get one.

 

Okay I think fair enough DLA premiums each week or £10 a year ~ no contest really.

 

ESA call back 2 (10 minutes later), Sorry we were wrong and you do qualify for it.

 

Next thing you know a notice arrives through the post saying Congratulations here's £20.

 

So the moral of the story is...... I don't know!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

I wonder if her £10 was combined in with either her IS or CA is that possible? She says her payments for those vary from week to week so she never knows what will arrive. She certainly hasn't had an individual payment of £10 at all.

 

Did everyone get theirs as a separate individual payment of £10 or was their paid with their benefit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got mine for the first time this year, it arrived separately.

I know I've asked a couple of times but am yet to procure an answer. Why is the bonus paid to CB ESA claimants but not to IR ESA claimants? I would have thought the latter needed it more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mine was in with my regular payments

 

Did you get a letter saying it would be in with your payments or you just noticed the extra tenner so you knew it was there? And what was the payment it was included with? Only asking because I wonder if hers was the same benefit and she's just not aware of amounts like you. She's confused about her payments always.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you get a letter saying it would be in with your payments or you just noticed the extra tenner so you knew it was there? And what was the payment it was included with? Only asking because I wonder if hers was the same benefit and she's just not aware of amounts like you. She's confused about her payments always.

 

I didn't get a letter. I wasn't even aware we had got the 'extra tenners' until this thread mentioned it. I went back to my online statements and saw that the payments were £10 more that week than they usually were. I hadn't even noticed at the time.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...