Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Trust deed that has lasted for 6 years! Help!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4378 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Nearly 6 years ago I signed a trust deed, I was advised that this would be the best route to take as I could not pay debts that had mainly been incurred as a result of my husband entering into an ill judged buiness arrangement. I signed the trust deed before a valuation was carried on the IPs instructions. In my opinion the valuation was considerably over the market value of the house and I argued this but nothing was done at this time i have continued to pay the agreed amount every month. At the end of 3 years I was told that the IP still had an interest in the house, at that time I gathered evidence that the house had been overvalued by showing the prices other houses in the street had been sold for at the time of valuation and also information showing over valuation based on the Bank of Scotland Scottish Price Index and the Nationwide house price calcullator, in addition I paid for a chartered Surveyor to carry ou a retrospective valuation, all this information confirmed thay the value of my house was approximately £106000 and not £123,600. (I have an interest only mortgage of £95,000). I received information back from the IP saying that additional sums were still required to allow the equity to be bought out. That was in March 2010 and I'm still paying my monthly contribution. I have no way to raise this sum and I cannot remortgage due to my credit rating, I have lived in the same home for the last 16 years and have 2 children to look after, I decided on the trust deed as I was told that I could stay in my home. After all this time and worry can they still force me to sell my home and end up homeless? Also my husband and i have been separated for 7 years and although his name was not on the mortgage he considers that he still has an interest in the equity of the house if I sell it, I'm not sure how this affects the situation? Can anyone give me any advice about what I should do. From what I can see from the statements my IP sent me, (not had one of these for a few years) it shows that all I'm really doing is contributing to the IP's annual fees. A solicitor suggested going to see an Advocate that specialises in these matters, but I'm sure that will cost thousands too?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi 6 year trust, Have you spoke to your solicitor to find out if you can get legal aid, i dont know much about trust deeds, hopefully someone who does will be along.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Without knowing the full terms of the Trust Deed it is difficult to comment as the process CAN be extended beyond the normal 3 year period. However if you want to lodge a complaint you should contact the following.

 

If the client thinks that the trustee's actions are unreasonable or contrary to the law, s/he could make a complaint to the company that the trustee works for and/or the professional body that the trustee is registered with. If the trustee is an accountant, complaints should be made to:-

91 Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland

CA House

21 Haymarket Yards

Edinburgh

EH12 5BH

 

Tel: 0131 347 0100

Fax: 0131 347 0105

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: www.icas.org.uk

92 If the trustee is a solicitor, a complaint should be made to:-

The Law Society of Scotland

26 Drumsheugh Gardens

Edinburgh

EH3 7YR

 

Tel: 0131 226 7411

Fax: 0131 225 2934

E-mail: [email protected]

Website: www.lawscot.org.uk

The Accountant in Bankruptcy (AiB) has a general power of supervision and audit of protected trust deeds. The AiB can investigate complaints about trustees but will expect the client to have raised her/his concerns with the trustee and their governing body first.

 

I hope this information is of assistance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In many cases the Trust Deed is extended in circumstances wher the debtor owns a property in order to buy out the equity without selling the property. There are a few other examples relating to assets.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...