Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Repayment Insurance Business Loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6417 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

Looking for some guidance on this matter, how to proceed, if we should proceed!

My wife and I took out a business loan with Lloyds TSB in 1999 for an amount of £59,500 to purchase a commercial property valued at around £75,000, loan secured on the property.

We originally wanted the loan over a 5 year period as we felt able to pay the high monthly costs. Business manager suggested 10 years as would keep costs down and give a little more monthly breathing space. Also there would be no penalty in repaying early if we were able to do so. Fair enough! Would say that at no time was repayment insurance discussed, or any other insurance for that matter.

So we were surprised to see on receipt of the formal loan agreement that the loan amount was £64,942 stating “this amount to be used for purchase of freehold premises and for the payment of a premium of £5442 for loan repayment insurance”

We queried this with the BM reminding him that it had been our intention to settle the debt within 5 years and that this premium was rather excessive for such a short period. He told us not to worry as we would be entitled to a pro rata refund of premium on settlement of the loan whenever that may be. We were also told basically no insurance, no loan!

To cut a long story we did in fact repay the loan at the 5 year date and received a premium refund of £1100, rather than the £2700 expected. The settlement figure for the loan included the full premium for the period which we queried and were told that we had to settle in full and that we would receive a premium refund within 10 days or so. We received the amount of £1100, 9 months after settlement date, despite continually hassling the bank for these monies!

A couple of points to mention - We never received a policy for this insurance, we never even knew the extent of the cover or even the name of the insurer or policy number!

We have been continually requesting copy of the policy, if only to just check the t&c’s, but having been promised this a number of times by the bank, still no policy.

We have at the same time been requesting the balance of premium we expected i.e £1600 based on strict pro rata, this has been declined by the bank who say not pro rata as premium costs higher at start of loan as larger amount o/s!

Having read through the various forums I am now wondering if we should not be requesting refund of premium in full as there has surely been a case of serious miss-selling here? In fact selling is wrong word, the premium was just added without discussion!

Regards

Derek

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, under s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit) you can ask for a true copy of your original agreement (ie the one with your signature) and any document referred to (ie a PPI policy) and they have to provide it within a set time frame laid out in the Act or the agreement in void, BUT from what I've read on this site as this was a business loan I'm pretty sure the CCA won't apply, however there must be something similar for business to business agreements and someone on here will know. Just thought I'd bump you back up to the top of the list again! Good luck. Koko

Link to post
Share on other sites

Koko

 

Thanks for your reply, and and I am sure you are right in that CCA does not come into this. I think perhaps a more formal letter to bank saying we will not be going away and intend to fight legally if necessary might actually make them take the matter a little more seriously, as at present they appear to be showing little if any interest!

 

Regards

 

Derek

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I more or less had the same scenario but I did manage to get a copy of the application form for the loan and the insurance. I found that on the insurance form there were several tick boxes that had been completed by my BM which I had not seen - I was only ever given the last sheet to sign. I have been fighting for months to get the premiums refunded but they have refused outright saying that under the T & C's I should have cancelled within 30 days. The policy details I think might be on their web site. I have now had a final refusal to repay and I will have to take it further but it might take some time to get a legal case sorted out. I am contmplating going to the FSO not because I really expect a good verdict but its free and will cause the Bank a bit more hassle whilst I sort out the court route. It is surprising how many of these cases are coming to light but in view the heavy sales culture at the Bank it is hardly surprising.

 

Good luck - anything I get which is useful you can have

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Keith

 

Thanks for your information. Will be very interested to know how matters progress for you. Likewise anything useful that happens with my case, I will let you know.

 

Thanks again and good luck to you

 

Regards

 

Derek

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...