Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car Accident Need Advice


rebeccalongson
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6314 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have Fully Comprensive Insurance on my Car. I had to take my car for a service, therefore I needed to borrow my friends car, which was insured by him which meant I was covered by my insuance to drive this car.

 

I was on my way back from work driving my friends car. I was approaching a junction and the car infront had to stop causing me to stop. When it was her time to go she edged off and I edged off as the road was clear, when suddenly she slammed her brakes on, therefore so did i but it caused me to clip the back of her car causing a minor dent on her tailgate. Fair enough I ran into the back of her, but she was fine, we both exchanged details and agreed to sort it out later and carried on the day as normal.

 

When I got home i informed my insurance and they noted it down.

 

I spoke to the ladies husband later on that week and he said that he needed a new tailgate at the cost of £900 and he took my insurance details to sort it out that way. Fair enough.

 

Two months later, this was yesterday, I received a phone call from my insurance company (RAC), stating that the other people are claiming that there car is a write off, due to a high speed impact to the left hand side of the vehicle caused by me, cause i was speeding and they said that the car had to be towed away from the scene. This is a complete lie, i was totally gobsmacked!!!

 

I was driving no faster than ten mph and only clipped her tailgate causing a small dent to the boot lid. And the car didnt have to be towed away, she drove it away fine, no problems.

 

Where do I stand in this situation, I need to fight my corner as they are telling complete lies.

 

:mad: :?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take it you have already filled out a claim form???

 

The Insurance Company should send out an investigator to look at the other parties vehicle, take statements from the other person, investigate the crash locus, etc.

 

I would tell your claims department she is exagerating the claim, and strongly suggest they send someone out.

 

You haven't mentioned the car you hit - if the car is worth no more than approx £1500 then they would class it as a write off though.....

Abbey - owed £3260 - Paid up.

 

Barclays owed £2500 - Paid up.

 

Halifax, Mint & Egg - next on the hit list

 

Dont click on the scales - I'm quite proud of my little red dot! - As the little red dot has gone - click away!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has your own vehicle been repaired, if not send in photographs of the damage to your vehicle or the estimate to your insurance company. If you have minor damage then its unlikely to cause heavy damage to the TP vehicle. Also, the £900 does seem a bit steep for a small prang, a new bumper possibly about £300-£450 depending on vehicle but labour cost etc would be fairly small. Is this person also claiming for whiplash do you know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Evening

 

First of all this sounds like a typical low velocity impact case. Secondly it sounds like a fraudulent claim. Stress to your insurers that they need to defend this action, however they may like to take the view that it would not be economical to fight it. These people need engineering evidence to claim for anything so unless they can pick holes in this evidence they are stuck. They can get their own engineers out and get their own approved repairers to deal directly with the Claimants if need be.

 

Personally I would take photographs of the accident location, do a sketch plan to accompany it together with a statement of exactly what happened, without feeling just factual and send it to RAC with a covering letter citing that it was clearly a low velocity impact and you believe that the claimant's are making a fraudulent claim. Ask if they have been provided with a copy of the claimant's engineering evidence and suggest they obtain the claimant's GP notes to see if there are any entries around that date of them having been in a road traffic accident. If it was that high speed they would be claiming for personal injury as well.

 

Might be useful to get RAC to compare your repair details with their repair estimate, if the areas of damage and degree of damage don't tally up then RAC have a stronger chance.

 

All the best

 

Teddybear xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I dont know how old this thread is as I have just registered but I thought I would do a bit of searching as I am also looking for some advice. My wife also hit the car in front about 2 weeks ago. She got out of the car as did the 3rd party and as there was no damage both exchanged details and both decided to leave. My wife had 2nd thoughts so she decided to take photos of the cars as we had a deposable camera in the glove box. Suddenly the third party got back into their car and miractulously got whiplash. Police were called as were paramedics and fire dept. They decided to take off 3rd party roof off to avaid 3rd further damage to neck until my wife said 3rd party had been out of car and actually taken a drink of water my wife offered. They then simply got her into the amblance and that was the last we heard until yesterday (Tuesday 8th 2007) a letter from 3rd party solicitors confirming claim for whiplash and they will be seeking medical advise. This is now ongoing so I am doing my best to photograph 3rd party going about daily routines with no problems. So it would be wise to not only photograph the incident but also everything around the scene including anyone in the location. I dont know how far insurance companies go to prove fraud but I think there is too much of this going on which is effecting not only our no claims but also our premiums.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...