Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide


An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.

£19.99 + £1.50 (P&P)




Last Will and Testament Kit


Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.

£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

BAILIFFS - The Law and Your Rights

Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.

The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.

£13.95 + £2.00 (P&P)


Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg. 05783665 in the UK

reg. office:
923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE



+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 55
  1. #1
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    sean1 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28

    Default Sean v's Lloyds *LLOYDS ABUSE STRIKE OUT*

    Thanks for your advice Martin, I was well and truly p***d off.

    I was on the verge of giving up when Lloydsicon issued their defense straight away against my claim, and it was pointed out that I had made a mistake by not submiting all the details on my claim form.

    I will ring moneyclaim to amend my form but after I have read up a little more, I have ordered the 'Lawpack' book to try avoid making any more stupid mistakes.

    Mean while it is reasuring to know that help is always available when all seems lost.


    Sean.

    Similar Threads:

  2. #2
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    sean1 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28

    Default Re: adamski V lloyds

    Help!!

    I have received a leter from the county courticon this morning: -

    ***Upon the courts own motion. The Court has made this order of its own initiative without a hearing. If you object to the order, you must make an appointment to have it set aside, varied or stayed within 7 days of receiving it

    It is ordered that

    The claiment do file and serve by (Date) full particulars of how this claim is made up.***

    I thought that I had done this when I returned the AQ, I included a break down of the bank charges that I was claiming.

    Has anyone else received something similar to this, I'm not quite sure what to do now.

    Regards
    Sean.


  3. #3
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    freebird Informative freebird Informative freebird Informative freebird Informative freebird's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jul 2006
    I am in
    up the wall
    Posts
    823

    Default Re: adamski V lloyds

    I don't understand this one Sean, ask the mods/adminicon if they can help..I thought our breakdowns went off months ago ?

    1/6/06 request charges
    16/6/06 received charges
    18/6/06 first request for refund
    3/7/06 "No" letter from bank
    13/7/06 LBA
    7/08/06 handed claim to court
    10/8/06 court stamped as date of issue
    24/8/06 deemed to be served
    25/8/06 Sechiari filed acknowledgement of service
    6/9/06 defence served
    9/9/06 copy of defence and AQ received by me
    25/9/06 deadline for AQ submission
    25/9/06 call Sechiari confirm safe receipt of my AQ
    26/9/06 received copy AQ from Sechiari
    29/9/06 letter to SCM to say "you want 1 month to settle, so settle"
    18/10/06 after "strained communications"and how !
    verbal offer of full settlement with conditions
    communications rejecting conditions from me
    5/11/06 received letter offering settlement with conditions
    7/11/06 sent fax rejecting conditions etc
    14/11/06 unconditional settlement in bank and how !

  4. #4
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    sean1 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28

    Default Re: adamski V lloyds

    I filed my claim on line and omitted the detail of the claim in error, so I posted my break down with my aqicon. I just sent a spreadsheet of all the charges that I was claiming line by line.

    Stupid question - but how do I contact the mod/adminicon?

    Thanks
    Sean.


  5. #5
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    I am in
    balanced
    Posts
    8,495

    Default Re: adamski V lloyds

    When you say that you did not detail your claim, are you referring to the list of charges, or did you not use the Particulars of Claim section at all?

    If you used the Particulars from the site and they are referring to the list of charges, I would phone the Court and ask them to check your file to see that the aqicon is there, along with a schedule of charges.

    ..

    .

    Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.



  6. #6
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    sean1 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28

    Default Re: adamski V lloyds

    Thanks - I will do that.

    When I filed my claim on line I put that I was claiming unfair bank charges.

    After reading the forum I realised my mistake and sent a letter to their solicitors and also put a break down of bank charges in with the aqicon.

    Regards
    Sean.


  7. #7
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    I am in
    balanced
    Posts
    8,495

    Default Re: adamski V lloyds

    Quote Originally Posted by sean1
    ...When I filed my claim on line I put that I was claiming unfair bank charges.

    After reading the forum I realised my mistake and sent a letter to their solicitors...
    What I'm searching for is the wording - so are you saying that your Particulars of Claim stated "I am claiming unfair bank charges" ?

    If so, what exactly did you write when you contacted their solicitors?

    ..

    .

    Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.



  8. #8
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    I am in
    balanced
    Posts
    8,495

    Default Re: Sean v's Lloyds

    Please be quite specific.......

    ..

    .

    Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.



  9. #9
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    sean1 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28

    Default Re: Sean v's Lloyds

    Hi,


    This is what I sent to them: -



    Claimant _ _ _ _ _

    Name:


    Defendant Lloydsicon TSB Bank

    I have a contract with the defendant bank, account (_ _ _) from (Date) which is conducted on their standard terms and conditionsicon. I am claiming the return of money taken by the defendant in the way of charges over the last 6 yearsicon. The banks charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. Further, as a disproportionate penalty they are invalid under the Unfair Contracts Terms Act 1977 s.4and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999.Para.8 and sch.2 (1) (e).In the event that the charges are not a penalty then they are unreasonable within the meaning of Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15.1 have asked the bank repeatedly, to justify their charges and they have declined to do so. £xxx is the amount owed. A Breakdownicon is available.


    Have I messed up??


    Regards
    Sean.


  10. #10
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    I am in
    balanced
    Posts
    8,495

    Default Re: Sean v's Lloyds

    The letter is fine, but on your original court claim, in the Particulars of Claim section, what did you write, precisely?

    ..

    .

    Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.



  11. #11
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    sean1 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28

    Default Re: Sean v's Lloyds

    I wrote the following: -

    'Reclaiming of unfair bank charges.'

    I read on the forum that if I sent a letter to their solicitors that this would be ok?

    Regards

    Sean.


  12. #12
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad Authoritative jonni2bad's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2006
    I am in
    balanced
    Posts
    8,495

    Default Re: Sean v's Lloyds

    OK.

    I think you should also write a letter to the District Judge (unless you have been informed about a specific Judge) and state that your original claim did not particularise the claim and that you would now like to offer a more detailed explanation.

    Include the Particulars of Claim from the templates libraryicon (N1 version) and another copy of the spreadsheet of charges. Do this asap.

    ..

    .

    Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.



  13. #13
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    sean1 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28

    Default Re: Sean v's Lloyds

    Thanks.

    I will let you know what response I get.

    Regards

    Sean.


  14. #14
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    rivendale0506 Novitiate rivendale0506 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    215

    Default Re: Sean v's Lloyds

    Sean if it is of any comfort I had something like that from the court (not about the same thing that you did) but I wrote to the judge telling him I would like to amend my particulars of my claim.. included another N1,... and got an order back saying that I could and the defendant was also then provided with a copy of my updated claim by the court.. You may well have to pay a £35 fee though if you want to change your particulars of claim on another N1..

    Hope this helps

    Status:

    Halifax - DPA sent 03/03/06.
    Prelim Letter - Sent 27/03/06 ignored.
    LBA sent 10/04/06 - Ignored
    Moneyclaim filed - 26.04.06
    Acknowledgement received 3rd May. Halifax state they intend to defend.
    Halifax Settled in Full - 17 May 2006

    If you've found this post helpful, I would be grateful if you could click on the 'Scales of Justice' button in the top right corner of this post.

  15. #15
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    sean1 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28

    Default Re: Sean v's Lloyds

    It has helped alot - thanks.

    I feel a bit of a wally, but hopefully thanks to all the help I will be able to salvage something.

    Thanks again.
    Sean.


  16. #16
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    freebird Informative freebird Informative freebird Informative freebird Informative freebird's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jul 2006
    I am in
    up the wall
    Posts
    823

    Default Re: Sean v's Lloyds

    Sean we all make mistakes along the way but we can rectify them and with all the help offered on here, you'll get there..
    good luck

    1/6/06 request charges
    16/6/06 received charges
    18/6/06 first request for refund
    3/7/06 "No" letter from bank
    13/7/06 LBA
    7/08/06 handed claim to court
    10/8/06 court stamped as date of issue
    24/8/06 deemed to be served
    25/8/06 Sechiari filed acknowledgement of service
    6/9/06 defence served
    9/9/06 copy of defence and AQ received by me
    25/9/06 deadline for AQ submission
    25/9/06 call Sechiari confirm safe receipt of my AQ
    26/9/06 received copy AQ from Sechiari
    29/9/06 letter to SCM to say "you want 1 month to settle, so settle"
    18/10/06 after "strained communications"and how !
    verbal offer of full settlement with conditions
    communications rejecting conditions from me
    5/11/06 received letter offering settlement with conditions
    7/11/06 sent fax rejecting conditions etc
    14/11/06 unconditional settlement in bank and how !

  17. #17
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    sean1 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28

    Default Re: Sean v's Lloyds

    Thanks Freebird, I'm starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel and feeling more confident now.


  18. #18
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    sean1 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28

    Default Re: Sean v's Lloyds

    Hi.
    Just to let you know that I received a letter this morning from the county courticon stating that my claim has been stayed until the 18th Dec to enable both parties to attempt settlement.

    It states that on or before 02nd Jan 2007, one of three steps must be taken:

    1/the claimant must notify the court of settlement
    or
    2/claimant / defendant must write requesting an extension of the stay period explaining steps to be taken towards settlement
    or
    3/all parties must file a completed AQ at the court

    Does anyone know if I need to send another AQ in if 1 & 2 don't happen?

    Thanks
    Sean.


  19. #19
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH Authoritative GaryH's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    May 2006
    Posts
    6,516

    Default Re: Sean v's Lloyds

    You need to get in contact with them and ask what their proposals are for settlement, since it was them who requested the stay. Send SC&M this and also a copy to the court -
    Dear Sir/Madam,

    I write in relation to the above claim
    (put claim details at top of letter) and specifically the staying order placed upon it by the court on **/**/**.

    You requested this stay to be ordered in the allocation questionnaireicon of the defendant, in order that a settlement is reached by way of negotiation. The court has subsequently acceded to your request and I am therefore inviting you to offer your proposal's for the settlement of these matters.

    I am writing on the assumption that your request to the court was made in utmost good faith and with the genuine intention of resolving the matter in hand, rather than merely an attempt to further delay proceedings in this case. I trust that as the representative of a reputable and esteemed organisation, you would not hold the honourable court's order in such contempt as not to respond to this letter positively and in the manner in which your request for the stay has indicated.


    As such, I will expect a response prior to the date set by the court, **/**/** informing me of how you intend to proceed.

    A copy of this letter has also been sent to the court.

    Yours faithfully


    Please remember to DONATE! Help CAG keep up the fight!


    Any advice or opinion is offered informally & without liability. Use your own judgment and if in doubt seek advice of a qualified and insured professional.

  20. #20
    Basic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    sean1 Novitiate

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    28

    Default Re: Sean v's Lloyds

    Thanks Gary.



Browsealoud
Video Tour



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE