Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote... as has already been said, they use their own criteria. if a person is not stated as linked to you on your file then no cant hurt you. not all creditors use every CRA provider, there are only 3 main credit file providers mind, the rest are just 3rd party data sharers. if you already have revolving credit on your file there is no need to apply for anything just 'because' you need to show you can handle money. if you have bank account(s) and a mortgage which you are servicing (paying) then nothing more can improve your score, despite what these 'scam' sites claiml  its all a CON!!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Disciplinary Work Hearing


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4418 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

as i am new to this site please be patient with me,

 

im facing a disciplinary hearing in work soon.

 

The allegation is gross misconduct being more specific damage to the work urinals,

 

work have shown me still images of people entering the toilet including myself within a timescale via the corridor cctv,

and have provided an unsigned witness statment who states that they heard the damage actually happen,

 

in the first witness statement it states that the first person in was in there for only an extremely brief time,

this has been proven by the images as 7 seconds,

then described on the statement a second a few minutes later entered and caused the damage,

this has been timed as 3 mins 55 seconds,

then i enter some 15 minutes after the first person left,

 

the witness then states that after 20 minutes in the loo they left and told manager,

passing the last person to enter without telling them any thing,

 

now the informant and the last person where in there for 12 secs together without talking,

then at the end of the statement it states that the damage happened just before the informent left,

so meaning me,

when it states that he said at the start of the statement that the second person a few minutes later caused the damage,

 

i gave my side of the story then my manager said he will have to arrange another investigatory meeting ,

 

meeting with the informant again and also the last person to enter,

he never interviewed the last person only this informant who clearly states on the second again unsigned statement that it happened just before i left,

 

in the managers e mail about this second statement he states that he found this meeting useful.

 

now the first statement was taken 16 days after the alleged event and the second statement 30 days after the allegation

and more importantly the second statement was when i was suspended

 

i stated that most know about my suspension so that the informent must know as well and therefore this statment is tarnished and completely different to the first,

 

my manager did not listen and has found me guilty ,

so the next step is this disciplinary hearing,

it has to be mentioned that the first manager is my own and does not have great feelings for me because im on restrictive duties he finds me a hinderence to his shift,

 

i have reasons for this as well, so thanks and please give me some advice..................

..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Employment Forum

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

did you do it?

 

dx

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a bit of a problem unscrambling the sequence of events, perhaps you could clarify.

 

The first prospective culprit went in, stayed 7 seconds then came back out. Would it be fair to assume that he did not do the damage as he had little time to do anything much?

 

The second prospective culprit went in, stayed just short of 4 minutes and then came back out. Would it be fair to say that he had plenty of time to cause the damage?

 

The third prospective culprit went in, that was you. You went in some 15 minutes after the first prospective culprit left, and presumably the second prospective culprit had left as well by then.

 

You do not specify the length of time you spent in there, or if you noticed anything amiss, or anyone else in there. If the urinals were damaged, would you not have noticed?

 

The fourth prospective culprit went in after you had come out, how long after? How long was he in for? Did he notice anything amiss, or any damage? Did he report anything?

 

Would it be correct to conclude from what you say that the witness who wrote the statement had been in the toilet for about 20 minutes and that this 20 minutes covered the time period in which prospective culprits 1, 2 and 3 came and went, and prospective culprit 4 was still in there when he left? Would he have been perhaps in one of the toilet cubicles? Would anyone wishing to cause damage not have made sure that nobody was around to witness his actions? Would he not have noticed that there was a potential witness in there?

 

From what you appear to be saying the same witness wrote two statements. In the first he says that prospective culprit 2 caused the damage and in his second statement he is saying that prospective culprit 3, you, did it. Is there any reason why his second statement should be believed and not his first?

 

Is there any reason why prospective culprit 4 and the witness who wrote the statements should conspire against you? Could, for example, the witness be too scared of prospective culprit 4 to implicate him?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, to clarify, informant in at 11.30.03 out at 11.50.11. 1st culprit in at 11.31.51. Out at 11.31.58 so 7 seconds, 2nd culprit in 11.35.13. Out 11.35.43, so 30 seconds, 3rd culprit me in at 11.46.36 out at 11.47.09, so 33 seconds, culprit 4 in at 11.49.55 out dont know not told, informant out at 11.50.11 so 20 minutes inside toilet. When i entered i never saw anything or heard anything, just used the urinals and left.the first informant statement taken before i was suspended and taken 16 days after the allegation states in it that the second person described as a few minutes later caused the damage, this is timed at 3.55 after culprit 1 left.it states thatwitness heard damage for between 8 -10 seconds kicking sounds. Two urinals damaged as stated in photograph taken after event, but they are only investigating one urinal damage because the informant stated that he only saw one urinal leaking but on his second statement remembers about the othe oneas well. Other toilet damage has recently happened as well including bodily fluids being put on the walls of both m and f toilets. When i enquired about this i was told that all attempts had been undertaken but these proved to be futile. This being after we all had a letter from the operations director stating that there are ways of finding who this person are, but no action was taken the first witness statementstates that the 2nd culprit done it and at the end also states that this happened 2 mins before informant left meaning me, i stated that this ending sentence stating this two minute timescale does not seem to be in keeping with the rest of the statement, ie i think its been added. The manager said he would talk to culprit 4 and informant again culprit 4 never spoke to , informant spoke to again 30 days after allegation. Infornant said in the 1st statement that 1 or 2 people entered , the second statement that positively 2 or 3 entered but the damage definately happened 2 mins beforew he left, meaning me. This second statement was again unsigned. Also stated on the second statement that he saw the damage to the other urinal but never mentioned this the first time around. Finally culprit 4 entered 16 seconds before informant left, i asked why informant never mentioned this to culprit 4, why did culprit4 not mention about any damage, many thanks any advice before i see my solicitor and the disciplinary hearing , finally the manager mentioned his resonable belief for his reason

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the clarification.

 

This stinks (pardon the pun). The witness who made the statement was in there for over 20 minutes. If you exclude the time prospective culprits 1, 2, 3 and 4 were in there he would have been in there on his own for a total of 18.5 minutes approximately.

 

I think it sounds more than a bit strange that anyone intent on causing damage would not have checked to ensure that there were no witnesses before he started causing the damage.

 

I think it also sounds more than a bit strange that the so-called witness did not call out or come out when he heard the din, and that having noticed the damage as he was leaving he did not mention anything about what he had heard and what he was seeing to the only other person in there (prospective culprit 4).

 

It sounds to me like the witness who made the statements is making them up, that he is trying to drop you in it (pardon the pun) to deflect suspicion from himself.

 

Perhaps you might think of some reason why the manager should take his word for it rather than yours, because, based on what you have said so far about his statements, I can’t see why he should be believed.

 

If I were manager I would also be questioning why he spends so much time in there. It is also peculiar that he did not bother washing his hands but went straight out. Could it be that he was not using the toilet for its intended purpose, or was he in such a hurry to get out because he did not want to be confronted and possibly quizzed about the damage by prospective culprit 4 who had just come in? Seems like very furtive behaviour to me.

 

You say that toilets have been damaged again since the incident in question and despite claims that the culprits of those incidents can be discovered no action is being taken. Would I be right in assuming that if they had any evidence that could link those incidents to you they would link them to you? Can the ‘witness’ account for his movements when those other incidents occurred? I would be demanding that his toilet breaks were totted up to see if there is a possible link.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, the damage to other toilets happened before this incident, but after this event blood was smeared onto walls of toilets, on another shift, i asked about this and was again brushed aside with the fact that all incidents are fully investigated, the informants first statement states that he did wash his hands, the manager finds me a hinderence to his shift due to my restrictive abilities, before september all was fine in work, september i was sent home unpaid 5 times due to no work being available for me. Now i stated that 3 out of the 5 times i was sent home i had been doing that job before september with no issue, i was then told that because it was not on my work physio assessment due only to a clerical error that i was not allowed on this task yet before september was allowed on it, then they being manager said that the crewing had been cut back so i would not be able to rotate on that role which is untrue, other incidents have happened this year including him telling me that i will never be trained the way you are. Meaning because of my restrictions im useless, finally i have never been sat down and signed anthing to agree to these deductions from my pay. Lastly i questioning the actual statements if they are not signed then does this mean that they being the informant does not exist?.................................. Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

This does stink the best you can do know is get your defence to this sorted.

 

1. The Witness Statement are un-signed therefore these statements are no better than hearsay. (If these were actually true statement then why have the witnesses not signed them and who actually has written these statements?). Please remember with this not to inform employer as this gives them the opportunity to correct the mistake you are now defending yourself.

2. Why did it take 16 days to get a witness statement (were they off work on holiday etc i would ask for clarification as this should really have been done that day or then next day)

3. Their is actually no physical evidence that you carried out this damage only hearsay and the cctv outside the toilet in corridor only shows who entered and exited toilet. (as they are using this cctv footage as evidence request copies of that cctv footage).

4. Why has the informant not been questioned properly as he had the most opportunity to cause this damage then realise there mistake and who had came and went from toilet so they could have blamed anyone that entered and exited during this time in toilet to cover their tracks.

5. You need to get copies of there disciplinary & grievance procedures, staff handbook (if one issued), witness statements, cctv footage.

 

Has the company also explained to you your rights to be accompanied at the meeting by either a union rep or work colleague as this is a Gross Misconduct hearing.

 

Please also have a look at the ACAS website IMHO this really stinks.

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

also have a look at ACAS website heres the link:

 

www.acas.org.uk

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

HELLO ALL, HAD DISCIPLINARY HEARING, MEETING ADJOURNED SO I CAN PRESENT CASE I MORE DETAILED ORDERED FASHION. THEY BEING WORK ARE STILL GOING WITH IMFORMANT STATEMENT AND ARE STATING THE VERY LAST SENTENCE OF THE FIRST STATEMENT ALONG WITH THE CCTV FOOTAGE WHICH SHOWS ME ENTER AND EXIT ONLY, I WILL WORD THE STATMENT FOR ALL TO SEE AND ADVISE BEFORE I GO BACK TO SEEK MORE LEGAL ADVICE, I WILL PRESENT TWO STATMENTS. QUOTE 1ST STATEMENT SENT VIA EMAIL 16 DAYS AFTER EVENT................ to the best of my ability i will be as acurate as possible as it was over 2 weeks now, i recall being in the furthest or end wall cubicle, during my time i was in the lavatory i think only 2 people, or the same person came in whilst i was there.the first appeared to only be in there for an extremely brief time, as if they didnt use the facilities at all. the second a few minutes later, who by the sounds of it , used the urinals in a normal fashion, then based on the noise i heard, proceeded to violently kick something, repeatedly for about 8 to 10 secs, which sounded hollow or wooden, and not masonry. i was immediately alarmed as it was very loud and gave me quite a shock. my first thought was why were the cubicles not moving or responding to the kicks or blows being showered upon them,and in an instant realised the blows must be directed at something else,...but i couldnt imagine what. i didnt quickly picture any other area so close that could sound like what i was hearing. the person then left without pausing to wash hands. i completed my visit to the cubicle and came out expecting to find immediate signs of vandalism or destruction to something, but i didnt see anything right away.it was only when i looked further around that i spotted the centre urinal leaking quite heavily from the u-bend water trap, now finally explaining the results of the kicking.tell tale witness marks had been left, by a black object/boot sole, on the water trap and the kicks had clearly followed through to the wood paneled false wall behind the urinals, explaining the hollow noise.after staring in disbelief at the actions of totally unnecessary destruction for a short period, i washed my hands and left passing CULPRIT D MY WORDINGS EVERYONE CANT MENTION NAMES on the way out. i didnt pause to mention the above to CULPRIT, but went to inform the shift manager.the time between the person in question leaving the toilets and me leaving the cubicle was approx.2 mins. THATS THE STATEMENT. BECAUSE WORK SAY THE CCTV MATCHES THE VERY LAST SENTENCE THEN THATS IT, IVE ARGUED ABOUT THE FIRST SECTION OF THE STATEMENT TO NO AVAIL, SO BEFORE I PUT THE SECOND STATEMENT ON WHICH THEY ARE NOT USING BECAUSE THEY NOW CHOSE TO GO ALONG WITH THE FIRST STATEMENT BUT IN THE INVESTIGATORY MEETINGS TWO OF THEM CHOSE TO BELIEVE THE SECOND STATEMENT, ADVISE PLEASE , ALL TIMES ARE MENTIONE IN EARLIER POSTS THANKS .........................................

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Have they explained why these statements are unsigned and taken 16 days after said incident?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Also have you requested that these witness who have made the statements as they are employees are present so that you may question them as you are entitled too.

 

Also has it been explained to you that you have the right to have either a Union representative or work colleague with you at these meeting?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

they are deciding to keep all witness identity secret from me, yes i am represented. what i want to know is why are they not listening to the start of the statement ?? instead they are remaining with the very last sentence thanks...................

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

they should have explained your reasons for dismissal at the hearing and your right to appeal and they will forward this in writing to you. (If possible it may be useful when you get the letter to scan and put on forum minus personal details).

 

I still think this stinks, they refused you permission to question the witnesses and kept them secret. (Do you have it in writing that they refused this request)

 

Also if they are keeping the witnesses secret who actually wrote these witness statement. (did the statements have the employees name on them).

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello, all that was said was that i done the act based on the anonymous witness, he heard noises and said it happened within the last few mins, so based on that they decicded to terminate my employment, also stated by manager that i had repeatedly failed to take responsibilityfor my actions and tried to blame others. yes they did tell me about appeal hearing, i asked why the witness remained secret and was told that he asked to remain anonymous, thats it . no have not got it in writing. and no the name of witness blanked out in emailed statement, the other talks with informant are just that they are only verbal between manager and witness, many thanks is this unfair dismissal?, if i dont get anywhere with the appeal then next step is tribunal do you all agree

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Please please look at the ACAS Website and even give then a call.

 

Point out to them:

 

1. The company stated that you done the act based on the anonymous witness statement that was an unsigned email.

2. The company refused you the opportunity to question any witnesses on the basis that they want to remain anonymous. (Could it not be that the person wants to remain anonymous because they actually caused the damage).

 

I would not agree that the next stage is triburnal you would have to go through the appeals procedure beforehand then triburnal.

 

Also have you checked the companies Disciplinary & Grievance policy to see what it states about witnesses remaining anonymous?

(If there is nothing in that i would be asking the company for a copy of the policy/procedure that refers to witnesses).

Edited by stu007

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again. Could anyone offer me advice on how to defend myself for the appeal hearing against my summary dismissal,all that was said in the disciplinary hearing was that i had no mitigating circumstances. All i done was use the urinal no more, i need to try to overturn this decision so any help please. Also if i loose the appeal then have i got a case for unfair dismissal? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Calm down and stop panicing we are trying to help you!!!!!

 

Please answer the questions being asked as there is a valid reason for those questions so a proper picture of your circumsatnces can be made to give you the best advice.

  • Haha 1

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,in answer to your questions, yes they did explain the reason for dismissal and that was damage to company property under gross misconduct and i did have the right to appeal and this will be in writing.

I did ask why the witness remained annonymous and was told that he wishes for it to remain that way and that it is signed.

I think they meanthat the signature from informant is about his wanting to remain annonymous not the actual statement.

The e mailed statement sent some 16 days after event was questioned by me and the response was that they being the manager was happy with the timescale. The e mailed statement didi have the informants details on but my copy had been blanked out these details or so they said.

I have checked my disciplinary policy and no mention about any witnesses on there.

So in my summary dismissal work have relied on an annonymous statement that the informant stated he heard damage around 2 mins before i left the toilets and that the cctv showed me exit around this time.the last person to enter never interviewed because work said damage already done. But this last person never reported this to management, so i have been sacked on the basis of an annonymous witness.

How do i approach the appeal process because just before he told told me i was dismissed he stated that i had constantly from the start blamed others and that i put in no mitigating circumstances. So all advice welcome

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...