Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I agree with my site team colleague above. We need to know all the facts including which company you are dealing with and an explanation of the problem. It really is too difficult to start giving speculative advice on some speculative problem that you have laid out as a generalised scenario
    • Moorcroft are sending a rep round to my house this week. What is the best way to handle this? Ignore and not answer the door or engage with them? I haven't acknowledged anything since I started on this journey and defaulted on my cards in December 2022
    • Very sorry but with the best will in the world, I don't think we can at all understand what the situation is here. Please can you try rewriting this on a word processor and maybe send a copy of what you have written to a friend and working out together so that the story is complete but as brief as possible. Maybe a list of dates as well. If you can do that and then repost your story we can have a look
    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

A&L loan help please


Madge67
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4303 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took out a large A&L loan in 2007 to consolidate etc etc etc - you know the story. The application was made via telephone and they sent the forms via post for me to sign, which I did. I have recently CCA'd Santander who took over A&L. and thry have duly sent me a copy of the orginal agreement.

 

The agreement includes amounts for PPI which I had crossed through those and specifically stated on the back of the agreement that i did not wish to purchase PPI. I will scan the Agreement and post it tomorrow for your thoughts. It looks ok to me.

 

My beef with them is that I hit financial probs in 2008 and offered reduced payments which they accepted for a while. I wasthen advised that as i could not afford to pay my arrears they swould be looking for a CCJ to apply a charging order on my property and it was only a formality and not to worry, to keep making reduced payments. I was so naive at tthe time and just went along with it. I had just had a baby and had no idea how to deal with things like this. It was utter madness as our house was (and still is) in negative equity so the order is worth zilch to them.

 

I am continually pursued by Shoosmiths who state they are delaying with the debt. Im just wondering where I stand on this - I know it's a bit of a imppossible question to answer at the moment but I thought it important to get a thread started in the hope that someone has been through a similar thing with A&L or another bank.

 

I will send an SAR to Santander to see if there are any flaws in their processes. I just wonder if its all too late beings as the CCJ has already been awarded.

 

Madge

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Just to update this thread. SAR docs were sent to me on 03/11/12. Contained very little info and only related to most recent loan which was taken out in 07. I had several loans with Alliance and Leicester and am certain there would have been PPI on them. Sadly I have no records - DOH!. Santander are saying that they have destoyed all info prior to this. I dont believe this for one minute so failed SAR letter to go tomorrow demanding the info or records of destruction dates, authorisation etc. I will keep you posted as to what comes back (if anything). Id love to hear of anyone in a similar position who has won their PPI claim. I didnt want to just submit a 'just in case' claim. Its far better to have the info to hand .

 

Madge

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi guys just an update,

 

Ive recd a letter today from Santander stating the historical information can only be retained for legitimate reasons, therefore some personal data may no longer be held as it has been deleted in line with our retention policy. We can however confirm that we have sent you all the personal data that we still hold in relation to the customers account.

 

Im unsure what to do next folks. I had a feeloing they would do this. Should I be SAR'ing Alliance and Leicester maybe as these were who the loans were with?

 

I know I had many labs with A&L and they are bound to have PPI ont hem that I want to claim back

 

thanks

 

Madge

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anybody advise on this please. Should I send an SAR to A&L for old loans even though Santander had taken over the latest loan. I am pretty certain I had PPI on the old loans but Ive no iodea how I can find out without an SAR,

 

Cheers

 

Madge

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well ive been searching high and low for any kind of references and even resorted to asking my bank for old statements which they duly sent.

 

This paid off and I have at least one ref number for the old A&L loan. Next question is - where the blinking heck do I go from here? I have already SAR'd Santander who only sent the very latest loan details. Should I write back to them 'with reference to my previous SAR request' and give them the account numbers now that i have them?

 

Any advice is really appreciated

 

Madge

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...