Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that "read me", It's a lot to digest, lots of legal procedure. There was one thing that I was going to mention to you,  but in one of the conversations in that thread it was mentioned that there may be spies on the Forum,  this is something that I've read quite some time ago in a previous thread. What I had in mind was to wait for the thirty days after their reply to my CCA request and then send the unenforceable letter. I was hoping that an absence of signature could be the Silver Bullet but it seems that there are lot of layers to peel on this Onion.  
    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Nat West CCJ & PPi Claim


knights templar
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3785 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Every body;

 

Contracted Nat West ;

 

Nat West Loan was a combination of loan and Overdraft which the bank advised me to take.

Defaulted on both loans due to unemploymement.

 

Nat West obtained a CCJ.

 

Payment in order since Court order.

 

Can I apply for refund of the PPI on both loans from both banks although there is a CCJ on both loans and how can I effectively do this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

read up in the PPI forum

 

and yes you can reclaim the PPI

 

what about unlawful fees too

 

bet you had loads on the HFC one.

 

you indicate TWO loans

one Natwest

one HFC

 

both have individual ccj's?

 

you'll need to make a thread for each claim

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

do a customer complaint form and SOC for each

 

if you've not got the agreements/statements

you'll need to SAR each first

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

thread tidied

 

how are your claims going KT?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx10uk;

 

Sorry for the long delay ; have being on holiday ;

received responses from Nat West and HFC on PPI claim ;

 

Nat West claims that according to their records no PPI payment made on loan and

HFC states that the PPI payments were later with drawn by me ;

this I find puzzling;

but received a refund from Black horse less tax;

I must say the cheque is handy as I just came back from holiday;

I plan to pursue any bank charges on the Nat West loan which I defaulted.;

 

as for HFC; I will request formal details of all documentation on the loan as I do not have details of the agreement to find out whether what they are saying is correct:roll::oops:;

you can't trust these 'alleyway[EDIT] ';

 

Any ideas or suggestions.KT:wink:

Edited by ims21
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Have just received an offer from Nat West Bank for a reclaim of my PPI application;

but they have put a conditionality of acceptance that the pay out will be offset against the balance of the loan;

 

which I have expressed concerns on grounds that the loan is curently being paid off after a county judgement and payment are up to date;

 

secondly the PPI as I understand it is an unfair and illegal charge on the loan by the bank.

 

Any comments on my line of reasonning to Nat West Bank for the refund to be paid directly to me?

Link to post
Share on other sites

they cannot offset against the whole of the balance even with a CCJ

thats unfair to your other creditors.

 

just remember its a civil debt so PPI is unlawful not illegal [thats criminal matters]

 

i would write back stating you will not be bound by any conditions.

 

the debt is being paid off through the CCJ

 

there is no authority in the judgement box that allows them to do that

 

in effect they are going against the ruling of the judge.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

how does the ppi refund measure up to you soc figure

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Works on part-time basis for a transport business ; but lately do not get much work; what are my rights under the employment act; have been with company for over 5 years ; just keep quiet or ask company to find me work or make me redndant any suggestions?:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

natwest , hfc now lloyds

 

 

you really should have a thread for each

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi CAGS ; Happy christmas and Properous New Year to every one !!!!!!!!!!!

 

Have just received a letter from Nat West Bank accepting liability that the following charges were applied to my account between the periods 1904 to 1912;

 

these included upaid item fess ,

account keeping fees

and unarraged borrowing fees;

 

is it possible to claim back these charges from National Westminster Bank?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1904?

 

were these bank account charges

 

if so very diff?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi dx 100uk; Sorry made a 'boob' on the date ; well spotted; the date should be 2004 and not 1904; I quote from letter sent from National Westminster Bank; ' ftom your current account -I have reviewed transactions data between 09/12/2012 and 02/3/04 and can confirmthe total amount in charfes applied was £942.82' ; can I make a claim as it clearly states they were charges.:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

not on bank accounts

 

but try

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

ims21,

Sent SAR to Nat. West Bank ;

just received a response from Nat West Bank ;

after I had highlighted to them inadequate documantation they hold on me ;

their response was unable to locate loan agreement ;

they claim as they were unable to locate loan agreement ;

we would therefore have no documents available apart from insurance added to the account.

 

What should my next move be ?

 

They conclude if I was not satisfied I should contact the Financial Ombudsman.

 

knights Templar:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims21; Received SAR response from Nat. West Bank today ;

 

Nat West Bank unable to trace my loan agreement may send available information in the near future ;

 

Nat West Bank state ;

 

if not satisfied contact ombudsman ;

 

any ideas how to approach this or contact ombudsman for further investigation.

 

knights templar:?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry...this is all very confusing.

 

You said earlier that NW stated they have no PPI showing on the account. (Post #11)

 

Then you say they have made an offer (Post #12)

 

What did their offer consist of, i.e. what is the breakdown of the figures?

 

If they have no agreement, what have they said about how they calculated the offer?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx100uk,

 

Received received from Nat West Bank ;

upon SAR request ;

that Nat West Bank unable to locate loan agreement and documents ;

although a judgement debt have been obtained at county court by Nat.West Bank

and debt being paid by instalments;

is it possible to challenge NatWest Bank to produce loan agreeement and documents in court

otherwise debt cannot be enforced by Nat West Bank .

 

knights templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi dx;

just received another offer from Nat.Westmister Bank that upon further investigation into my previous claim

which they have already settled ;

 

they claim to have found further errors and have made another offer again ;

but wish to offset this payment to my CCJ default balance ;

 

I know you have made a response to the same after the initial offer was made ;

 

does the same written response stand or are there any new information on the issues of offsets by these banks ;

 

the CCJ is being paid off .Thanks

 

Knights templar

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is your NatWest ppi thread.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...