Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
    • In anticipation of lodging my court claim next Weds 1 May (14 days after advising P2G that was my deadline for them to settle my claim) I have completed my first draft POC as below: Claim Claim number: xxxxx Reference: P2G MAY 2024   Claimant xxxxx   Defendant Parcel2Go 1A Parklands Lostock Bolton BL6 4SD  Particulars of Claim The defendant has failed to arrange for the safe delivery of the claimant's parcel containing a 8 secondhand golf clubs (valued at £265) that was sent to a UK address using their delivery service (P2G Reference xxxxx). The defendant contracted Evri to deliver the parcel (Evri Reference xxxxx) and refuses to reimburse the claimant on the grounds that the claimant did not purchase their secondary insurance contract. The defendant seeks to exclude their liability in breach of section 57 Consumer Rights Act. The secondary insurance contract is in breach of section 72. The claimant seeks reimbursement of £265, plus P2G fees of £9.10, plus postage costs for two first class letters to P2G of £2.70, plus court fees, plus interest. The claimant claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from xxxxx to xxxxxx on £276.80 and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgment or earlier payment at a daily rate of £xxxx   Details of claim Amount claimed £276.80 I look forward to your thoughts and comments guys! As ever, many thanks - G59    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Access to bank accounts by JCP and/or local council


jared
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4607 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

My first post so please forgive me if this subject has already been covered

 

Does anyone know whether JCP and/or local councils have the right to access all your bank account when you try to claim JSA and/or council tax rebates?

 

A friend of mine claims she supplied them with a statement from one of her bank accounts and they came back to her with an alternative figure which matched her combined savings from her 2 bank accounts (the total figure was under the threshold anyway, so she was entitled to full JSA and council tax rebate anyway, but was stunned that they could access her 2nd bank account)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome,

 

I've moved this thread to the appropriate Forum.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Nystagmite

 

Thanks for quick response; no, as far as she led me to believe she only handed over a recent 3-month statement of one of her bank accounts, as requested, and give no authorisation for any further access

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jojopo000

 

Thanks for your response; I still can't believe they can legally access a bank account for which they have been given absolutely no details of in terms of bank, account number, sort code etc. Surely they can't ask every bank if a specific person holds an account with them

 

However, I recently heard from one source who claimed that, if you give them details of one bank account, they can search 10 years back into this account and look for payments to/from another account(s); they can then access the other account(s) this way.

 

Not sure if this is the case for my friend, I'll need to ask her

Edited by jared
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I take it both accounts were with the same bank ?

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi maroondevo52,

 

No, both accounts were with totally different banks, one was RBS and the other ING

 

That surprises me, though I must admit I don't know much about how JCP and Local Councils operate.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously I know this is nothing to do with fraud BUT I watched an episode of the BBC series "Saints and Scroungers" a couple of months back and on there the councils fraud department were accessing details of bank accounts etc and that is how they caught a lot of people out. I presume if one department has access to them others would too? Just a thought.

Link to post
Share on other sites

maroondevo52, backofbeyond and caledfwlch

 

thanks for your responses; while I have no objection to public bodies taking all reasonable steps to prevent fraud, I just cannot understand what possible legal mechanism could be employed to allow any organisation to access details in a bank account with the only information available being a name and address and with no prior knowledge of Bank, branch, sort code etc; surely, even checking credit files won't flag up any useful info?

Link to post
Share on other sites

maroondevo52, backofbeyond and caledfwlch

 

thanks for your responses; while I have no objection to public bodies taking all reasonable steps to prevent fraud, I just cannot understand what possible legal mechanism could be employed to allow any organisation to access details in a bank account with the only information available being a name and address and with no prior knowledge of Bank, branch, sort code etc; surely, even checking credit files won't flag up any useful info?

 

The same way any debt collector, or finance institution does. They check your credit file, which will show up any accounts you hold.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is puzzling. It's been well over a year since I worked for the DWP, but in general the staff cannot directly access your bank account. Obviously they need to know the acct number and sort code in order to make any payments, and they can ask to see statements if the rules require it. But they can't just call up and ask for Joe Bloggs's bank balance on a whim.

 

Now I understand that there is talk of using credit reference agencies for fraud prevention and so on, so maybe it's changed. And of course, fraud investigators have extra powers, as we'd expect, but those guys aren't involved in the routine processing of claims.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nowadays all claimants are credit checked by outside agencies as routine, and so they have a complete overall view of all your bank accounts, savings accounts and debts and linking addresses etc. Since the current government seems obsessed with benefit fraud (despite the largest amount of money wasted goes in clerical error rather then actual fraud) they've been farming out claimants info to private companies to do this before any payments are made.

 

It seems these days that If you want any help from the government ie benefits, single persons council tax reduction, working tax credits, then you sign away your privacy and you must expect to be credit checked.

 

Pity they don't treat politicians this way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nowadays all claimants are credit checked by outside agencies as routine, and so they have a complete overall view of all your bank accounts, savings accounts and debts and linking addresses etc. Since the current government seems obsessed with benefit fraud (despite the largest amount of money wasted goes in clerical error rather then actual fraud) they've been farming out claimants info to private companies to do this before any payments are made.

 

It seems these days that If you want any help from the government ie benefits, single persons council tax reduction, working tax credits, then you sign away your privacy and you must expect to be credit checked.

 

Pity they don't treat politicians this way.

 

Interesting to know, thanks. I knew there was talk of this.

 

Wonder if they do check MPs. There would be a legitimate purpose to do so - you can't be an MP if you're bankrupt.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They're not worried about bankruptcy they're only worried about nosing into benefit claimants money It seems. MP's have been getting away with murder for years now, and despite some of them being recently taken to task over claiming false expenses, reports have come out saying many have reverted to their 'old ways' so to speak. Not surprising really considering who's running the country now.

 

'Great Britain, run by the rich for the rich'....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your friend would have had to declare all bank accounts held for her (and a partner if she has one) and give details of the balances of all accounts under each catagory (they separate bank and building society accounts) even if they are not in a positive balance - if she had one account with £300 in credit and another account with an overdraft of £200 then her combined balance would be £100 but they would ask for proof of both accounts - at least that's how I read the forms when I filled them in a few months ago!!

 

Feebee_71

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to everyone for the feedback: have just discovered a link which would indeed suggest almost draconian powers to investigate JSA/council tax rebate claims: haven't done 10 posts yet so not allowed to post link but its dwp.gov.uk/docs/cop-ssfa.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can DWP/Councils access people's bank accounts when they claim benefit?

 

The basic answer is normally "no".

 

The powers available under the SSFA can only be used by authorised officers who are senior investigations staff. They are only permitted to use such powers where there is a reasonable ground to do so and there is not really an alternative avenue to obtain information, e.g. benefit fraud cases.

 

When a person claims benefit, they will normally be asked for details of their bank accounts and the balances in the accounts.

 

If a person declares that they have 2 bank accounts, but only provides statements for one account, the DWP/Council may decide to either request statements for the second account he claimant or they may choose to accept the balances provided by the claimant. The latter sounds like what has happened in this case.

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi id6052

 

Thanks for response but she only told them about one bank account

 

Hi sadone

 

I can't accept that they can simply request a credit check and bingo! obtain the balance and details of every account; since I have no knowledge of credit checks, I simply assumed they only existed to record payment defaults and the like from finance companies!

Edited by jared
mi
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well the government has given the DWP full powers to check everyone who claims benefits via private credit agencies in a push to stop fraud. This proposal (like in the article above) was all over the net and is old news now.

 

Thats why those who have working tax credit have been waiting far longer then normal for their renewals to be processed as all this extra checking is slowly processing claims down to an incredible amount.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...