Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No  7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice' I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof?
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance Direct Debit Charge - Threatened Legal Action


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4628 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello all,

 

wondering if someone can help me here as I just can't get my head around this one!

 

I was involved in an accident in my van which was a total non fault accident on my part - 3rd party and their insureres amitted full liability. Anyhow, as a consequence of the accident my van was written off. Third party insurance paid out and I bought a new van. Unfortunately due to some of the fitments to my new van my original insurance underwriters refused to insure my new vehicle. I stayed with my broker Autonet Insurance and they arranged alterantive cover with a diferent undewriter. As a consequence of this Autonet are now claiming that I owe them £184 for the old policy in cancelled direct debit costs or something like that?

 

I didn't cancell the policy the underwriter did. I paid my direct debits without fail and they are paid upfront in advance of months risk. I was only put in this situation due to something that was not my fault - yet I still have to apparently pay for the outstanding policy on a van that is non longer in existence as it has been written off and scrapped and therefore carries no insurance risk. I can't understand why in addition to my new more expensive policy purchased through the same broker I also have to pay for a policy that is effectively defunct for a van that was written off by someone driving into me? Surely if this amount is so important to them as the insurance company (broker) can't they calim it from the third party - as it is they who have put us in this position?

 

I have received a - You will be pursued through our debt collection team, county court judgement letter unless I pay within 7 days.

 

Can someone help me understend this direct debit charge business as i just feel that someone is having my trousers down here?

 

All the best

 

Big Merv

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally after a claim on any annual policy, you have to pay the remaining premium that is due up to renewal. Just because you pay monthly, does not make it a monthly contract.

 

It does not make any difference that they could not Insure the new van and the brokers had to arrange an alternative policy.

 

By the sounds of it Autonet are not very good at explaining issues to their customers. You can complain, but the premium is due. Ask for a breakdown of the amount they are asking for.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the replies folks.

 

I have been in touch with them via the phone and I am simply told is part of the terms and conditions. I will write to them and ask for a copy of the said terms and conditons and a breakdown of the outstanding charge.

 

Just seems like a bit of a con to me. :mad2:

 

Big Merv

Link to post
Share on other sites

as the van was wrtten of, your insurance comes to an end for that vehicle, so you have to pay the remaining costs for the year. same as if you had paid in full at the start; you would not expect a refund would you? you paid your insurance and it was sorted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as the van was wrtten of, your insurance comes to an end for that vehicle, so you have to pay the remaining costs for the year. same as if you had paid in full at the start; you would not expect a refund would you? you paid your insurance and it was sorted.

Depends if Merv made a claim on his policy or claimed directly with the third party. Full premium would be due if a total loss claim was made on the policy, but it's not clear from the OP what happened. Just the vehicle being written off doesn't make the full premium due if that policy didn't pay out anything. Even if it did, I think Autonet are being harsh if all costs were recovered from the third party.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No there was no claim made on my policy as it was a total non fault accident on my part.

 

As for it being sorted...well that's a whole different matter all together! I get the feeling I was only paying insurance to comply with my legal obligation to do so, because all the sorting was done by me as the insurance company were f'ing useless!

 

I await their reply to my letter regarding there terms and conditions. It appears that they are counting the fact that there was a need to change underwriters following the accident because my existing underwriters refused to insure my new vehicle as a choice of mine to cancel my existing policy?

 

Big Merv

Link to post
Share on other sites

The point could be that the t&c's of the policy require the full annual premium to be paid, in the event of any cancellation mid term.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...