Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Part of a settlement agreement.   concerbs over her nane online we’re raised and I was blamed for bad mouthing. I explained I put nothing up myself.  cannot discuss details of the case as per agreement.  
    • The sticky thread is locked because it's just a template thread. We need to see the invoice you're disputing. And for you to answer the questions below (I'm guessing this is an ANPR capture, the vast majority of tickets are) -   For PCN's received through the post [ANPR camera capture] (must be received within 14 days from the Incident)   Please answer the following questions.   1 Date of the infringement Give answer here   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] Give answer here   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received Give answer here   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Give answer here   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Give answer here   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] Give answer here   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up Give answer here   7 Who is the parking company? Give answer here   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Give answer here   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. Give answer here   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here   Copy the windscreen or ANPR section to your thread and answer the questions... …….... In either case scan up both sides of any letters/tickets in or appeals made out to ONE MULTIPAGE PDF ONLY
    • Perfect, thanks Dave.   You're right, a whole dodo storm this has been. As sons of first-generation immigrant parents, whenever something like this happens the old man panics. There was a whole "appeal this now" because my dad paid for the parking as he was with the hirer at the time and he isn't as tech-savvy as my brother so he ended up doing what he did and because I don't live there anymore it came all the way down to this.  But yes, we'll do this SAR and see what comes of it.  Will keep posting here with the hopes that it may benefit someone in the future.  Thanks again, everyone. 
    • saying the thread is locked, what shall I do?
    • Please fill in the forum sticky and upload a copy of the invoice, redacted of anything that could identify you -  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halifax home insurance and Wayletts and Co


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4631 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I wonder if any of you guys have come across this before, last week we noticed our wooden floor in the kitchen change colour (it went dark) in one corner of the room. This was after 3 days of torrential rain and thought perhaps it was a broken drain or soakaway (1930s) house.

 

I started to investigate by opening the cupboard door by the damp area, went outside and checked there, I put my head to the ground by the air vent on the patio and could clearly hear running water. I called out home serve (after putting Halifax on notice about a potential claim in case it was drains not covered by my homeserve policy)Homeserve located the leak and fixed it after an access hole was created by taking out the kitchen cabinet and cutting a hole in the wooden floor.

 

Homeserve said the ground under the house in the crawlspace was saturated and looked like it had been leaking for some time and may explain why the floor was wet as it was likely the water had saturated the base of the walls and travelled up. Wayletts came today and said they could not validate my claim as they could not prove the water leak under the suspended floor to the damp patch on the wooden floor.He said he could not rule it out, but had to be able to prove to the Halifax that the damage was a result of the broken t junction in the main water supply under the house.

 

I challenged him and suggested that surely it was for him to prove it was not, he then said that I needed to create a further hole to establish that the water had penetrated the floor above the leak. I made the remark that if the water had been escaping under my house for some time it would need to escape or it would settle somewhere. The report said that as the leak was 1 metre from the damaged floor it was not possible as it was too far away and could not see a clear trail, please note he could see all of the foundations or the whole of the crawlspace as there is some kind of a wall running under my house which prevented him from seeing the corner where I believe the water has soaked up the supporting wall.

 

It has been left that it is for me to prove that the water leak (please note it was like a tap was running when homeserve located it) is the cause of the wet floor. Now I am not a housebuilder or engineer (I do have an element of common sense though) but I know water travels and the anount of water under the house was significant.

 

Does anyone know if it is for me to prove the 5amage was caused by the water leak or is it for them to prove its not? BTW this guy didn't come prepared, not even a screwdriver, he stated I live in a mid terrace property WRONG its end terrace, he also got the address WRONG he also said I pointed out damage at the other end of the kitchen WRONG it was the opposite side of the kitchen roughly a metre and a half from where the leak was(clearly doesn't know the difference between opposite and completely the other end).

 

He said he couldn't take damp readings under the house as the access panel made by homesrve was too small in fact I felt a liar as he said he couldn't see how someone could get down the whole. I think he was worried that he would get dirty, hed already said it was not the best of jobs to have on a Friday!

 

He said that the timbers by the access panel were not wet as if to substantiate his reason for declining my claim, why would this area be wet, this hole was purely above the broken pipe and the water was running away from the exterior waLl and towards the centre of the house (under the wet floor above)I should add that he could not give any other reason why the wet patch was there, thoughts appreciated please, Lou

Edited by unlucky1971
Link to post
Share on other sites

The only comment to make is that you need to make a complaint and ask the Insurers to send someone else.

 

If your Halifax policy does not cover trace and access to find such problems or some form of emergency cover, you will need to pay for another company to find and fix the leak.

 

I would have thought that you would have noticed a significant reduction in the water pressure in your cold water supply, had it been a leak in the water supply pipe. If there is no reduction in pressure, could it be a drainage problem ?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only comment to make is that you need to make a complaint and ask the Insurers to send someone else.

 

If your Halifax policy does not cover trace and access to find such problems or some form of emergency cover, you will need to pay for another company to find and fix the leak.

 

I would have thought that you would have noticed a significant reduction in the water pressure in your cold water supply, had it been a leak in the water supply pipe. If there is no reduction in pressure, could it be a drainage problem ?

 

Hi uncleBulgaria, thank you

 

Homeserve have fixed the leak, it was the blue poly water supply pipe running from the internal stop cock connecting to the tank in the loft and to the washing machine and kitchen sink, pressure in the house has never been great since we moved here and we have noticed no further loss of pressure, nor is our water metered so we really don't know how long this has been going on for.

 

I have called my home insurance out to inspect potential damage to the foundations as the water leak was not a dribble it was pretty heavy and am concerned from that perspective, I also want them to assess the damage to the solid wooden floor.

 

We don't know if there is any damage to the joists or worse dry or wet rot which is likely to form if not dried out correctly.

 

I am sure that the water is sitting somewhere in the void under the house and has been soaking up, thus why we have a wet floor. It was like a stream and I don't know if this will cause rot etc. Lou

 

Ps forgot to add, no damp readings were taken in the void under the house and I incorrectly stated the adjustor could see the whole void, in fact he couldn't and its the area he couldn't see which is below the damp patch in the kitchen floor.

 

I told him I would be making a complaint and asked for info on my right to appeal, despite him saying he would, no such literature was forthcoming, thus I rang the halifax as soon as he left to register my dissatisfaction, they obviously need to wait for the report before they make comment, fair play to my claim handler, even she made the remark that water travels.

 

Rant over, feel much better after a good cry, will ask for a 2nd opinion Monday.

Edited by unlucky1971
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi unl

 

Welcome to CAG

 

The guys will be happy to advise as soon as they are available.

 

Thread moved. Try to use spaces next time, to create short paragraphs.

 

Thanks and sorry, just was so annoyed

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phew just spoken to the Halifax or should I say Lloyds and based on the homeserve report and common sense have approved my claim, they were not impressed either with the ambiguous report and the non conducive pictures from the loss adjuster. I feel sorry for other legitimate policy holders who aren't prepared to fight their corner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...