Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Iphone Insurance Issue. Please help!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4656 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bassically I brought my iPhone 4 in December of last year and insured it a couple of days later, I won't mention the name of the company as of yet. On June 18th while abroad in Mexico I had the bag in which my phone was in stolen off the beach, it was placed directly next to me so therefore wasn't left unattended. I followed all the rules of the insurance company and within a couple of hours had sent an email to tesco to block the sim and blacklist the phone, along with that I had been to the local police station and reported the theft.

 

I waited until I was home (about a week later) to contact the insurance company about the theft. I sent them all the details they asked for and the claim form. A couple of days later however I realised I had made a mistake I had sent them proof of ownership of the IMEI number of my original Iphone which had since been replaced by apple due to a couple of faults. So I rang the insurance company and explain the situation to them and said I was in the process of recieved proof from apple although it takes a couple of days for them to send it.

 

Eventually I recieved an email from apple with all the details of the replacement and I forwarded this to the insurance company. I rang a few days later and they told me that the email was declined as it had been forwarded and therefore I could have altered it. They stated they either wanted an email directly from apple of a pdf attachment as I couldn't alter this. So I rang apple again and they stated it was against their policy to send emails to anybody other than the account holder but they did agree to send the details within a pdf attachment which they did. I received this instantly and so forwarded it so that the email address of the apple representative could be seen. I rang the next day only to be told that this had also been declined as there was no logo and they guy on the phone stated that everything else was acceptable and worded correctly and that I just needed to get apple to send the same document with a logo.

 

The next day I contacted apple again, I spoke to another apple representative who was completely bewildered as to why all the documents had been declined as the case number was included the insurance company could have contacted apple themselves to check all the details. I explained that the insurance company were refusing to do this and explain exactly what they wanted. He put me on hold to speak to his supervisor and when he came back said the supervisor wished to speak with me as he was quite unhappy that the insurance company wouldn't accept perfectly legal documents. The manager decided he would ring the insurance company on a three way telephone conversation to confirm all of the details, as he was put on hold however he said he would ring me back when he got through.

 

About half an hour later he phoned back to tell me there was a big problem, the insurance company were stating that they wouldn't accept his word over the telephone or any correspondance he sent directly from his apple email address whether it was in the form of a pdf file with or without a logo. He explained to me this is the first insurance company which has refused these documents but they have no reason to and that the only way he could help me was to send me a letter from apple and scan it and send it to them although he didn't sound like he holded out much hope. I'm extemely thankful to apple for going against their protocol to help me but I'm just wondering that this insurance company seems to be changing their story. I'm exceptionally unhappy with the service I've recieved and surely their just going to tell me that I've altered the letter from apple if they won't accept it from an apple email address.

 

Can anyone suggest any further steps? This claim is already taken 3 weeks and there really doesn't seem to be any solution. Thanks for reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...