Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Apex and CAbot pld associates Card


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3513 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Just had a letter from APEX, on behalf of Cabot, for a sum of over £6000, that is now due??

Err, right, they go on to say that Cabot Europe has searching databases

and has resulted in the fact that you live at XXX address and the amount is now due in full

 

No mention of who is asking for this £6000 that I apparently owe, nothing, just that it is due for payment in full.

 

I have taken out no loans in the last 15 years, so where this figure comes from I don't know.

Previous small debt problems are now statute barred, due to the length of time that has passed.

 

I have had dealings with Cabot in the past, but they gave up in the end when I reported them for harassment. Never heard of APEX,

 

It has gone in file 13, which I presume is the right thing to do. I know the general advice is not to contact them at all.

 

Confused, you bet.:!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Phishing trip

Cabot will have bought some old SB debts in a recent portfolio and farmed them out to Apex

Ignore the idiots

 

 

I thought as much, having heard nothing from a debt company for years, to suddenly have this land on your mat, makes your heart sink and being disabled, that is the last thing I need.

Thanks alfwithhair, I will ignore it, bet they write again soon...........:-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

well, they did write again and again, same thing, you owe £££ to Associates Capitol, contact us immediately,

next one, we have from Asoociates, we have bought the debt from Cabot........

...next one, from Cabot, you still owe £££ and you may be entitled to a 70% reduction,

please contact our trained advisers.

 

 

Bearing in mind these alleged debts, are from the mid 1990's, when I had two heart attacks and was off sick with only SSP,

hence things went pear shaped.

 

 

The last contact I had with one of the companies said they had had no payments since 2001. Since then, nothing, until last couple of months.

 

Now, another letter,

saying that you have 7 days, then we may apply for a CCJ and IF this is granted we may persue the debt.

Why, when it has gone way beyond the statute barred period?

Why are they dragging some cock and bull figure, owed to associates capital, who I have never had any dealings with.

There is no indication of who the original debt was with.

 

 

Do I ignore them, are they trying the usual scare tactics to get money out of me that is no longer due?

I am disabled, with multiple health problems and this is making my conditions worse, I just want rid of them.

 

I have checked my experian rating and it is 999, which I would say is pretty good.

Edited by babbles
Link to post
Share on other sites

file 13 aqain then or stat barred letter, or an official complaint about chasing alledged debts without first checking if you are the correct person, and add the following,

 

"by the way fools any alledged debts are well all and truly statute barred, and any further attempts to harrass will result in an official complaint to the relevant authorities with regards to your fitness to hold a consumer credit licence if you are unable to understand the regulations regarding statute barred debts"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pretty damned perfect!

 

I personally wouldn't give them time of day...

 

I won't, but it does worry me, which I suppose is their aim in life, to scare people. I hate seeing their letters, these debts are so old they are covered in dust, let alone statute barred.

With serious heart problems, the last thing I need is to get worked up about stupid companies like this, scraping out old debts in the hope of getting some money. Thanks bigshoes

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Two Years on, having heard nothing from anywhere,

 

 

a letter arrives, redirected from an ancient address,

from Cabot and Mk Hall, stating the same figures of over £6000 is owing,

no mention of to whom (they won't remember, this dates back to the mid 1990's)

 

 

I assume this is yet another computer pick up that is on a phishing trip as I have had no direct contact

with any debt company for well over 14 years and no payments have been made in this time.

 

 

MY credit rating is still 999 and no one has made any searches.

 

 

I assume these companies cannot just search without justification. I threw the letters in file 13.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ooops, the letters are now on the local tip, but if any more come, then i will keep them for reference. Thanks for replies.

Hi, Does this " account" appear on your credit reference files?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, nothing at all Brigadier.

My guess is this is statute barred.

 

 

No payments or unequivocal written acknowledgment in 6 clear years???

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

no payments or written acknowledgments for about 20 years. This is so statute barred it has cobwebs on it. Had another letter today from Muck Hall. Client Cabot, sub client Apex International. Talk about going to the far side of the field. This time they want to offer a substantial reduction to my supposed debt. Stating that it will show as partially settled on my credit ref file. Well, they, nor any other debt company has placed or searched or made any reference on my credit file, which remains at 999 and companies are trying their best to offer me this loan, that card - er no thanks, all the same. I have kept the letter this time, it is the same as I had a few years back, then they usually give up. Don't know how they can be allowed to dredge, then every 4 years send you the same letters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...