Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 20 million quid on just the brokering fee for a crappy deal with the UK public hocked to pay more for PPE - which was probably useless with better and cheaper per item with no 20 million quid fee - available from alibaba Stinks of corruption to me.  
    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
    • That's an idea on Maquarie. On being accountable, you also have to blame Ofwat and possibly the Environment Agency although they've been badly defunded. I put the Frost article up for balance.  
    • I agree HB, but there were no laws broken - its perfectly legal to fleece the UK and its infrastructure - and labour were little better than the Tories Perhaps an option would be to ban the aussie investment fund from the UKs markets
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Home insurance claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4659 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I am insured with Royal sun Alliance (buildings and contents). A few weeks ago i had a major leak in my bathroom . It was on a late Saturday and of course i couldnt get hold of them. I have been with them 10 years. Never made a claim and i have home emergency cover with them. All under the same policy. I called out a plumber he found the soil pipe from the loo was leaking. He had to remove the loo. remove all the tiles to the floor under the tiles was a sub floor that the contaminated water had leaked onto (the smell was disgusting). He had to remove all the boxing in of the pipe work as this was fitted on top of the floor tiles. plus he had to remove the wash hand basin I have a pregnant woman living with me so this was really urgent. The basin was put in the garden out of the way this got knocked over and broke. The plumber put the loo back temporarily until he could go and get the materials. I had a lovely bathroom before this happened. The plumber tried to keep his costs to a minimum All the refitting ie laying a new sub floor putting new floor down boxing in the pipework removing wc replacing damaged wall tiles clearing all junk out. Bearing in mind he had to come out late Satuday and Sunday came to in total £1.880 RSA will only pay £600 this doesnt even cover materials. they wont pay for labour. They are refusing to pay for some of the materials ie refitting of wc and soil pipe a new bath panel and other materials. I can understand them not paying for the basin but where do i stand. I have tried speaking to claims dept at RSA but the guy was so rude to me he wouldnt let me get a word in edgeways. Basically he told me thats all they will pay and no more. I will also mention i had another quote and it came out £100 more from another company.

Link to post
Share on other sites

RSA were once a really good company, but that stopped about 10 years ago, when they decided to close down half of their UK general insurance operation, moving parts to India.

 

Suggest that you raise a complaint with RSA head office and threaten to get the FOS involved. Don't be afraid to phone their head office. They may be obstructive, but just ask to be put you through to the claims directors PA or be provided with contact details for head office complaints. Don't accept a brush off with details of a complaints office in some part of the UK, where you will be made to go round in circles.

 

Timothy Mitchell is their claims director.

RSA Insurance Group plc

9th Floor

One Plantation Place

30 Fenchurch Street

London

EC3M 3BD

UK

Tel: +44 (0)20 7111 7000

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ty for your response. They have now said they will consider the cost of the labour and will get back to me. I said to him you are basically asking the plumber to work free of charge. He said rsa dont have to pay labour.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ty for your response. They have now said they will consider the cost of the labour and will get back to me. I said to him you are basically asking the plumber to work free of charge. He said rsa dont have to pay labour.

 

So you have a water leak causing damage and RSA believe that contractors will do the work for nothing. If that were the case, as soon as you mentioned RSA were the Insurers to contractors, I think they would pack up their tools and make a quick exit.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed, More Than/RSA are useless.

What basis are they saying their not covering it? if you have home emergency, it covers the fix of the leak, if you have buildings, it covers the resultant damage.

The policy is probably quite specific like all home emergency and will state you have to get their agreement prior to carrying out the repairs. You say you couldn;t get through to them, can you document this, get a copy of your phone logs showing you were on hold (for say 20 mins?) if only for 5 that might not be reasonable. It will possibly be capped at £1000 or £1500.00. Potentially this is going under 2 types of cover with 2 excess's?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...