Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • A key member of the US central bank, Raphael Bostic, tells the BBC rates might only ease "at the end of 2024".View the full article
    • A key member of the US central bank, Raphael Bostic, tells the BBC rates might only ease "at the end of 2024".View the full article
    • OK, thanks, I won't wait for them. On a side note, some of the posts on here are a bit frustrating, I read through five pages or so of someone going through the court process rooting for them as I'm reading, then nothing, not heard of again. Left here wondering what the outcome was, lol!
    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because there was still £69 owing, I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle. However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account ......... has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

End Legalised Loan Sharks.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2693 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 757
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Very important vote on Monday,help make it happen.Latest news

Thursday night, MPs were going to vote on an amendment to the Finance Bill, which will limit how much short-term lenders can charge. However, they got into a fierce argument about other aspects of the bill which kept them in the House of Commons until 2am. Even tea and toast couldn’t keep them awake and the vote has been postponed until Monday.

Now we’ve got 2 more days to send our MPs a flood of emails telling them to put a stop to legal loan sharking, which the government has already admitted is a problem. Your MP might not turn up to vote, or not vote the right way. We can persuade our MPs that this is something we care about and doing nothing is not an option. Could you get in touch with your MP and tell them to stop opportunistic lenders ruining people’s lives? Get started here.

Edited by tawnyowl
Link to post
Share on other sites

Last few hours. Email now.Links below.You could make a difference to be proud of..Kick off about 4-30pm

 

skkw_debtpicture.jpg Nearly half of all households are now struggling to make ends meet, and 10% of these say its because of the repayments they have to make on high cost credit products like payday loans, doorstep credit or hire purchase agreements. TODAY parliament has the opportunity to vote for action to be taken now to regulate this market- as it is in most other countries- and cap the costs of credit.

 

Yet whilst there is support for this measure across parliament, there could be a delay in action on this issue purely for party political purposes. Without pressure from campaigners, there is a fear that in order to create headlines at Liberal Democrat conference in the autumn Government MPs will vote against taking action now. You can read an article giving the background to this here and the views of grassroots Liberal Democrat activists who are angry that vulnerable consumers could take second place to choreographing coalition dividing lines. Every month more and more people are getting into debt with these firms, making any such delay potentially costly for thousands of families already experiencing financial hardship.

The debate and vote on New Clause 11 to the Finance Bill will be on Monday 4 July (having been delayed from Tuesday 28 June) and will start around 4.30pm. Its therefore not too late to ask your local MP to do the right thing and vote yes to encourage the Government to come clean and say what they intend to do now. The people struggling to repay these loans now deserve nothing less.

Edited by tawnyowl
Link to post
Share on other sites

The yes's 228 vs no's 273- when they publish plans on this later in year make sure you ask govt mp's why they left people hanging so long!.Stella Creasy comment shortly after losing vote.A few other comments.

Debate about to close govt voting no but hinting at deal that has been done. So if you are a borrower wait til lib Dem conf for respite!

 

Thank you for your efforts. As someone who has got into trouble through Payday Loans, I appreciate it. Please dont give up

Also a comment from a CAB worker saying how sad.And many more to folow as the news comes in.

 

And if this article is right maybe theres hope yet . But why delay.http://www.labourlist.org/eaten-by-the-sharks

 

Surely not. http://blogs.mirror.co.uk/parliament/2011/07/nick-clegg---youre-so-vain-you.html

Its not over yet.Tawnyowl

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Bit of news.

http://www.cfa-uk.co.uk/news.asp

 

 

Consumer Finance Association code of practice for payday lenders utter rubbish. more 'non action' . on legal loan sharks.

 

 

 

Hilarious - cfa admits only 8 members of group and they don't actually have an enforcement process worked out for it... Stella Creasy comment

Both consumer focus & cab don't want anything to do with payday lender voluntary code of practice as BOTH THINK think useless .

Payday lenders have failed to clean up their act:

Government must now intervene

http://www.responsible-credit.org.uk/uimages/File/cfrc%20payday%20code%20statement.pdf

 

Cfa claiming if you regulate uk Market there will be overseas lending to uk consumers like online gambling ....more novel excuses!

Edited by tawnyowl
Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely all a credit cap is going to do is shift the high risk customers to actual loan sharks at much higher rates of interest?

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

This will play intyo the hands of the banks who can charge whatever they want on overdrafts, because they dont have to quote an APR.

 

By trying to stop one high cost lender people will be pushed back into the arms of another who charges even more (and is responable for many of the problems we all now face).

 

Payday loans should not be used to top up peoples income and anyone with more than one payday loan needs their to take a look at their finances and stop before it all becomes to much. more regulation is desperatley needed in a sector that does whatever it feels like but for the people who use them correctly they are an alternative to even more expensive bank charges (or worse)

Link to post
Share on other sites

skkw_wfw_33.jpg

End Legal Loan Sharking Campaign Wins Government U Turn !

Lobby Your MP to Demand Independent Research

 

skkw_debtpicture.jpg Hello!

This week our campaign to end legal loan sharking won a significant victory- the Government has announced it is to go back to the drawing board and commission new research as part of its Consumer Credit Review. This is great news as it means they are now reversing their earlier opposition and taking seriously the calls for caps on the total cost of credit which could make a real difference in protecting British consumers who use high cost credit products.You can read the ministerial statement on this here.

I'm asking for your help now to make sure that this research is impartial and independent - In the past there have been real problems with the way research has been done in this area, and we have to make sure these problems don’t re-occur.

Please write to your MP asking them to lobby the Minister responsible Ed Davey to ensure that we can all be confident in the outcomes of the research this department commissions. Below is some suggested text to send to your MP and click here for a shortcut to contact your MP.

 

It’s vital that this research is done fairly, you can help make sure this happens.

 

 

skkw_stellasignatureshort_3.jpg

 

 

Stella Creasy

Labour and Co-operative MP for Walthamstow

 

 

 

 

Suggested Text for your MP

 

Dear XXXX

 

I understand that the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills is commissioning research looking into the effects of introducing a range of caps on the total cost of credit within the high-cost credit sector.

 

While I welcome this news as a positive first step towards introducing tighter regulation of high-cost credit, I want to be sure that this research will carried out by an independent body that has no previous connection to this area of policy. This is prompted by well-documented concerns about previous research on introducing interest rate caps in this market. The European Commission recently published an in-depth study which reviewed all such research, and concluded that UK research on this issue was based on “controversial” and “weak” evidence (“Study on Interest Rate Restrictions in the EU”, January 2011, pp269-270).

 

It is important that these weaknesses are not replicated in the forthcoming research on introducing caps on the total cost of credit. Please write to Ed Davey, the minister for consumer credit, asking him to ensure that the new research is impartial and independent from previous studies so that we can all have confidence in its outcomes.

 

Yours sincerely,

XXXX

Edited by tawnyowl
Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely all a credit cap is going to do is shift the high risk customers to actual loan sharks at much higher rates of interest?

Back in this thread there are a few links discussing this reasoning.I am sure everything will become clear soon.I hope so as i am getting a bit of a sweat on.

Won’t a cap push borrowers into the services of illegal loan sharks?

A cap must be set high enough to ensure lenders can operate at a level which is financially viable. We also need to ensure that alternative affordable sources of credit are readily available through the Post Office network, local credit unions, CDFIs, co-operatives and mutuals

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK but (and yes I appreciate that this is a common thought on these forums) arent you assuming that the relevant companies are therefore behaving in a way that is over and above economic viability? In fact, you are going one further and implying that there is some form of cartel (official or unofficial) setting interest rates higher than is economically viable for this type of loan. I would dispute that this is the case, and would state that if the interest rates are genuinely set at an "economically viable" level, then the change to the current situation will be zero. Ultimately, there is a lot of competition in that market, and it is an open market, which by definition will drive interest rates down to an economical viable level in any event.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...