Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have received a PCN from Euro Car Parks for MFG - Esso Cobham - Gravesend. I was completely unaware that there was any such limit for parking and always considered this to be a service station. I stopped there to use the toilet, have a coffee and made a couple of work calls. I have read the previous topics on this location which suggest I can ignore this and ECP will not take legal action. The one possible complication is that the vehicle is leased by my employer so I do not want to involve them with the associated reminders and threatening letters. The PCN was first issued to the leasing company Arval who have notified ECP of the hiring company. I have attached a copy of the PCN Notice to Hirer with details removed as per instructions. What options do I have or should I just pay the PCN promptly at the reduced rate of £60? img20240424_23142631.pdf
    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Got a cheque from my solicitor not in my name..........


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4684 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok, i was involved in a car accident 1 year ago.

 

Today i received a cheque for the repairs i made on my vehicle. I cashed it in today.

 

However today i also received a cheque for the hire car i hired out of my own money(as insurance wouldnt supply me). Its made payable to the hire car company, even though ive already paid them. Now i could go 120 miles round trip give them the cheque, wait for it to clear then go back to them 120 mile round trip and hope they dont rob me and collect the money. Seems odd and long winded.?

 

Or could i call my solicitor send the cheque back and get them to make it payable to me? is this possible? what would the process be? does the cheque come from my solicitors bank or does it come from third party insurers? there solicitors? or? is it a easy process? would they do it?

 

Appriciate a response...

Link to post
Share on other sites

surely this depends upon what account iyts drawn against [i'e who wrote the cheque out]

 

that person needs to be informed that [with proof] you've already paid remittance for the car hire, so thus, this sum needs to be paid to you.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This could be a simple oversight on your solicitors behalf.

 

Did you provide proof (receipt) that you had paid the hire car company to your solicitor? If so, that's all it will take to rectify this matter.

 

Now, if your solicitor provided the cheque from the firms account then they can easily cancel the cheque you have in your possession and issue a new one correctly made out to you or, if the cheque was provided by the third party insurer's, then you will have to return the cheque in your possession for your solicitor to return to them, in order for the thrid party solicitors to re-issue a new cheque.

 

Either way, it's pretty straight forward.

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i did provide the receipt for the hired vehicle and it clearly states i paid. I also told him verbally on the phone when he asked.

 

I have no idea where this cheque is from? does anyone know for sure if my own solicitor sent it from there account/insurance account OR it was sent from the third party insurers account/solicitors?.

 

Thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i did provide the receipt for the hired vehicle and it clearly states i paid. I also told him verbally on the phone when he asked.

 

I have no idea where this cheque is from? does anyone know for sure if my own solicitor sent it from there account/insurance account OR it was sent from the third party insurers account/solicitors?.

 

Thank you.

 

If it was a non fault claim and you were expecting a cheque in your name to reimburse the money you had paid for the hire company, then they have made a mistake. Send the cheque back and ask them to make it payable to yourself.

 

The cheque itself will have the name of the issuing company (the account holder). It could be from the third parties Insurers. If you call your own Insurers or solicitors they will have the contact address details for the third parties Insurers.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Speak to your solicitors,that's what they get paid for. Don't bother trying to get in touch direct with the third party insurers, and seeing as you've claimed for your own repairs, there's a good chance your own insurers will know little about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i did provide the receipt for the hired vehicle and it clearly states i paid. I also told him verbally on the phone when he asked.

 

I have no idea where this cheque is from? does anyone know for sure if my own solicitor sent it from there account/insurance account OR it was sent from the third party insurers account/solicitors?.

 

Thank you.

 

Was the cheque not accompanied by a letter? A compliment slip even? Very unprofessional if they just sent a cheque in the post.........

Santander PPI X 2 **WON** claims on behalf of son (Oct 2010/ Mar 2011)

Citicard O/H (PPI) - **WON** Compound Interest Dec 2011

Citicard O/H (Charges) Bailiffs sent in August 2012

Barclaycard - **WON** Compound Interest Oct 2011

Monument - account information being sought for OH

Citicard - self - N1 submitted August 2012

Barclaycard - self - **WON** damages for non disclosure/information now rec'd. Aug 2012

Barclaycard - relation - Failed SAR sent 29/09/11

Halifax SAR sent 18/08/2011 for relation

LTSB - SAR sent 09/08/2011 for friend

Link to post
Share on other sites

Speak to your solicitors,that's what they get paid for. Don't bother trying to get in touch direct with the third party insurers, and seeing as you've claimed for your own repairs, there's a good chance your own insurers will know little about this.

 

 

This!

 

Without trying to be rude threads like this make me laugh. Your solicitor is getting paid to do a job, just ring them! Its not rocket science...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, i dont think i mentioned i did contact my solicitor but hes away for 1 week. Thought id ask on here first incase someone knew i couldnt get a new cheque in my name, in that case i would just go all the way to the hire company and get them to agree to cashing in the cheque. But as mentioned i will wait for my solicitors return now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...