Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Debenhams Store Card PPI ***Urgent Help Required*******


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4355 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI

 

I am currently trying to claim against Debenhams (Now Santander) on a store card i took out in 1998 with Debenhams.

 

I have written and confirmed i beleive it was mis-sold as i had adequate cover from work,

and it had not also been exlained that i could purchase the cover elsewhere independantly if needed.

 

I have had their final response which was a no,

you signed thefore you were aware and could have cancelled at any time.

 

As this card was taken out so long ago my referral rights were for Finance & Leasing which i have done and they have also come back to confirm the decision is still a no

and sorry they can't help me.

 

I am thinking that my only option now is to persue through court??

 

Can anyone help point me in the right direction

 

i am now also behind with payments and being hassled by Lewis Debt Recovery.

 

Do i point out to them that this account is in fact in dispute??

 

Any help would be great, thanks

KatieJ :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 247
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Katie

 

Welcome to CAG

 

Court or fos, either one.

 

Personally I would go to court as it will be quicker.

 

Do you have ALL of your statements?

 

If you can answer that we can guide you through the process.

 

ims

Edited by ims21

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi IMS, thanks for your reply. I have most, however when the SAR reply came back there is a years missing from Feb 03 to Jan 04 where i estimated the PPi costs based on previous costs.

 

Hi

 

So you have an incomplete SAR then. They are in breach of the Data Protection Act for that.

 

Two choices on that one....

 

1 Write to them and point out that they have not fully complied and are in breach and give them 7 days to provide the information. You can then take them to court and force them to comply.

 

2 Stick with your estimate and base your claim on that.

 

My view is option 1 but that's because I like things to be clear.

 

Have you prepared a spreadsheet of your claim including the interest that they would have charged you?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims,

 

Having just checked again, the account started in Oct 1998, however the first statement they have sent is from Nov 2001 so there are also 3 years from when the account opened missing. I will do as you suggest and refer back to the DPA breach. The SAR was completed back in 2006 as i also claimed unfair late payment fees back at the time. Does it matter that my original SAR was so far back. I didn't realise when the account was opened until i did a CCA request in 2009 for a copy of the signed agreement. Should i CCA Lewis & Co in the mean time?? I have done a spreadsheet but a basic one as this is not my greatest skill!. I was just claiming back the premiums plus interest at 29.9% Apr as that was my interest rate??

 

Thanks

KatieJ :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ims,

 

Having just checked again, the account started in Oct 1998, however the first statement they have sent is from Nov 2001 so there are also 3 years from when the account opened missing. I will do as you suggest and refer back to the DPA breach. The SAR was completed back in 2006 as i also claimed unfair late payment fees back at the time. Does it matter that my original SAR was so far back. I didn't realise when the account was opened until i did a CCA request in 2009 for a copy of the signed agreement. Should i CCA Lewis & Co in the mean time?? I have done a spreadsheet but a basic one as this is not my greatest skill!. I was just claiming back the premiums plus interest at 29.9% Apr as that was my interest rate??

 

Thanks

 

Ah....SAR not recent then!

 

How long ago were you're final decision letters?

 

To be honest, what I would do is start afresh with a new SAR. You'll find a template in the library. Link to library is at the top of any CAG page. Make sure the wording is complete as to everything you want. Bear in mind you might not get actual copy statements but you should receive a full transaction history which is as good as.

 

When you get the information back, we can help you put a spreadsheet and claim together.

 

What is the position with Lewis? Can we have the full picture on this please?

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, not a recent one!, will re do the SAR again and see what gets sent this time.

 

Just a final point what do i do with Lewis & Co for the time being?

 

Thanks

 

Can you give some info as to the Lewis bit...how long have they been pestering you, in what manner, how frequently.

 

Thanks

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lewis sent a final demand 20 May requesting full payment. As usual such final important mail was sent business class which personally i feel is very inappropriate given the tone of the demand. I have then received a 'post card' last week sent second class asking me to telephone. They may have been ringing our land line, however phone broke so we don't know if anyone is ringing. Sattander's final decision letter on the complaint was 27 Jan 2011, and the response from FLA was 10 May 2011.

 

Thanks

KatieJ :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

OK, so get the new sar off.

 

Personally I would ignore Lewis. If they call, do not answer their security questions, state "In writing only" and hang up.

 

Any chance you can post up their latest letter (MINUS ANY PERSONAL INFORMATION) in PDF format?

 

When was the last time you made a payment or acknowledged the debt?

 

Sorry for all the questions....just need to get a clear picture

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I've not made any payment to lewis as they have only just started writing. Here is their doument, i don't know how to transfer it to PDF but hope this is readable??

 

Thanks

scan0003.zip

Edited by Kate1973
Removal of attachment

KatieJ :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Image is too small....can you do it like this please?

 

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets

as a picture file

remove all pers info inc barcodes etc using paint

but leave all figures and dates.

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites

convert the image to pdf format.

or ir you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

NB:you can set where it goes in the post by hitting insert inline.

the hit reply button

 

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Have today received a court threat letter from Howard Cohern, i will post it up later. Is it worth writing back and confirming the account is currently in dispute?

 

well, if it gets that far then you have at least two defences at the moment

 

1 Breaches of Data Protection Act which prevents you from validating the balance due

 

2 A counterclaim or the stuff you wish to reclaim but can't because of the failure under the DPA

 

Any chance you can post the Cohen letter as a PDF minus, of course, the personal information?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I'm back, had a very busy few days and work so not had time to sort. I've attached the letter from Howard Cohern which again for such important threats was sent second class!!. A couple of questions, 1. do i still re do the SAR and 2. do i reply to this letter???, if so what should my response be, i've not seen any transfer of documentation to Lewis & Co or Howard Cohern?

 

Many Thanks:-)

 

Hopefully the attachment is now correct??

HC first letter P1.pdf

Edited by Kate1973
New attachments added

KatieJ :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kate

 

Sorry, had to report your attachments as your name was showing. Don't worry, your secret is safe with me.

 

I would initially write back to Cohen saying that you have ther letter and that any court action they wish to initiate will be vigorously defended in view of the fact that the account is in Severe Dispute due to non-compliance with the Data Protection Act and other counterclaims. Suggest that they may like to pass this back to their client to avoid their embarassment in court.

 

Others may have a view on this as well

 

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...