Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I have had a secondary thought.  I borrowed £s from a completely separate entity 6y ago. It was personal and unsecured. I was going to repay upon sale of the property. But then repo and I couldn't.  Eventually they applied and got a charging order on the property.  Their lawyers wrote that if I didn't repay they may apply for an order for sale.  I'm not in control of the sale.  The lender won't agree to an order for sale.  The judge won't expedite it/ extract from trial.  Someone here on cag may or may not suggest I can apply for an order v the receiver?  But could I alternatively ask this separate entity with a c.o to carry out their threat and actually make an application to court for an order for sale v the receiver instead?
    • You left the PCN number showing, but no worries, I've redacted it. Euro Car parks are very well known to us.  I've just skimmed through the titles of the latest 100 cases we have with them (I gave up after 100) and, despite all their bluster and threats, in not one have they taken the Cagger to court. You stayed there for 2 hours &:45 minutes.  I'm guessing the limit is 2 hours and 30 minutes, right?  
    • If the claimant fails to draft directions the court can order a Case Management Hearing to set them but normally in Fast Track claims the claimant sets the directions...Unlike small claims track which are always set the court.
    • Not Evris offer, the court offers mediation service.   All claims proceed to hearing if mediation fails /not happen.   Why do you not wish to attend in person to stand your claim ?     Absolutely you must comply with the courts directions or your claim risks being struck out. Preparation for a hearing should happen irrespective of mediation.   https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/460613-suing-a-parcel-delivery-company-when-you-dont-have-a-direct-contract-with-them-–-third-party-rights-copy-of-judgment-available/#comment-5255007   Andy  
    • LPA.  (I'm fighting insolvency due to all the stuff that he and lender have done).  He appointed estate agents - (changed several times). Disclosure shows he was originally appointed for a specific reason (3m after repo) : using his powers as acting for leaseholder to serve notice on freeholders (to grab fh).  There was interest from 3 potential buyers. He chose one whose offer depended on a positive result of the notice.  Disc also shows he'd taken counsel advice - which was 'he'd fail'.  He'd simultaneously asked to resign as his job (of serving notice) was done and he'd found a buyer.  Lender asked him to stay on to assign notice to the buyer.  Notice failed, buyer didn't buy.  So receiver stayed.  There was 1 buyer who wanted to proceed w/o fh but receiver/ lender wasted 1y trying to get rid of them!  Disc shows why. But I didn't know why at the time. In later months Lender voiced getting rid of receiver. Various reasons - including cost.  But there's a contradiction/ irony: as I've seen an email (of 4y ago) which shows the receiver telling lender not to incur significant costs and to minimize receiver costs.    Yet lender then asked him to serve another notice - again counsel advice indicated 'he'd fail'.  And he did fail.  But wasted 3y trying and incurred huge legal costs - lender trying to pass on to me. Lender interfered - said wanted to do works.  Receiver should have said no.  But disc. shows he agreed to step aside to let them do the works - on proviso lender would discuss potential costs first (they didn't), works wouldn't take long (took 15m), and lender would hold interest (they didn't) (this last point is crucial for me now - as I need to know if I can argue that all interest beyond this point shouldnt be allowed?)   I need to check receiver witness statement in litigation with freeholders to see exactly what he said about 'his position'. But I remember it being along the lines of - 'if the works increased the value of the property he didn't have a problem'.  Lender/ receiver real problems started at this point. The cost of works and 4y passage of time has meant there is no real increase in value. Lender (or receiver) didn't get any permissions (statutory or fh) (and didn't tell me) and just bulldozed the property to an empty shell.  The freeholders served notice on me as leaseholder for breach of covenants (strict no alterations).  The Lender stepped in (acting for me) to issue notice for relief of forfeiture - not the receiver.  That wasted 2y of litigation (3y if inc the works) and incurred huge costs (both sides).  Lender's aim was to do the works that every potential buyer balked at due to the lease restrictions.  Lender and receiver knew couldn't do works w/o fh permission. Lender did them anyway; receiver allowed.  Receiver remained appointed.  I'm arguing lender interfered in receiver duties.  Receiver should have just sold property 4-5y ago w/o allowing any works.  Almost 3y since works finished the property remains unsold (>5y from repo). The property looks brand new - but it was great before.  The lender spent a ton of money - hoping that would facilitate a quick sale.  But the money they spent and the years they have wasted has meant they had to increase sale price.  It's now completely overpriced.  And - of course - the same issues that put buyers off (before works) still exist.   The receiver has tried for 2y to assert the works increased value. But he is relying on agents estimates - which have proved highly speculative. (Usual trick of an agent to give a high value to get the business - and then tell seller to reduce when no-one buys.). And of course lender continues to accrue interest (despite 4y ago receiver saying pause interest). Lender tried to persuade receiver to use specific agent. Disc shows this agent was best friends with the lender's main investor in the property.  Before works this agent had valued it low.  After works this agent suggested a value 70% higher!  The lender persuaded receiver to sack one agent and instead use this agent.  No offers. (Price way too high).   Research has uncovered that this main investor has since died.  I guess his investment is part of probate? And his family want it back?    Disc shows the sacked agent had actually received a high offer 1y ago.  Receiver rejected it.  (thus I don't know if the buyer would have ever proceeded). He was relying on the high speculative valuation the agents had given him to pitch for the business. The agents were in a catch-22.  The receiver sacked them. Disc shows there has been 0 interest ever since (inc via new agent requested by lender). I don't think lender or receiver want all this to come out in public domain via a trial.  It will ruin their reputations. If I can't get an order for sale with lender - can I apply separately against receiver?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Northampton County Court Claim form received - help please! **Claim dismissed**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4628 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi folks, I wonder if you could help me with this. I received the Northampton county court claim form yesterday. Its Arrow Global using Drydens as solicitors. I havent had any communication with them at all and think that my last payment on this loan was at longest - July 2005 but definitely not any later than September 2005. So it looks like very soon it may be statute barred.

 

Could you help me with what to do next - I assume I reply to the court asking for the full 28days and then request the info from the claimant, hoping that they either have none, or it drags out past the statute.

 

Should I ask that its transferred to my local county court?

 

Could somebody take me through it step by step and point me towards the appropriate templates please?

 

Many thanks,

 

AngryApe

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thank you DonkeyB. The particulars read... The claimants claim is for the sum ____________ being monies due from the defendant to the claimant under a regulated agreement between the defendant and FV-1 inc

(No ______________________) and assigned t the claimant on ____________, notice of which has been provided to the defendant.

 

The defendant has failed to make payment in accordance with the terms of the agreement and a default notice has been served pursuant to the consumer credit act 1974

 

And the claimant claims the sum of __________________

 

I left any amounts out in case of DCAs reading the forum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not sure who FV1 are - I imagine they are a DCA who bought a debt off a bank i used to use. I have been moving about a bit so wouldnt have all the information. I have had various letters from various companys saying I owe different amounts but have ignored everything up till now. I have only taken notice as its a court claim. Would a default notice be from the court or a DCA?

 

It was assigned last November according to the POC - I dont have copies of anything to do with it im afraid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your help today DonkeyB, I have read the links you posted and feel a bit more informed. I have acknowledged the court online and have amended and will be posting by recorded delivery, the CPR request in a moment. In their POC they refer to a regulated agreement between myself and FV-1, as they are a DCA surely no agreement would exist between us if I have had no contact with them ever?

 

Many thanks,

 

AngryApe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spot on. The agreement would have been with a bank, if it in fact existed. Do you know what the supposed original debt was for? Credit card? Loan? They say regulated, so it would probably not be a bank account.

 

The PoC is all you can respond to – if there was no agreement with FV-1, then that is a defence. But a long way to go yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DonkeyB, I think it was for a loan with the bank - I am assuming that as the debt has changed hands more than once, there is a greater chance that the original agreement may have been misplaced.

 

As I have now responded to the court and sent the CPR request, does that mean I should forget about it almost being stature barred?

 

Many thanks,

 

AngryApe

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello again folks - could I use your knowledge again? I sent the CPR 31.14 request by recorded delivery Friday before last and have not received any post from the claimant since. Could I ask what my next move will be regarding 1. The claimant, 2. the court?

 

Thanks in anticipation,

 

AngryApe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Re claimant. Send an urgent reminder by recorded post, stating that failure to comply with your valid CPR request will leave you no alternative but to ask the court to strike out the claim (unlikely, but make the threat anyway). Did you ask specifically for the NoA and the enforceable credit agreement in your CPR request?

 

2. If you acknowledged on line, you have a further 14 days to enter a defence. What date do you have to have your defence in by?

 

Did you ever receive an NoA from them in the first place? Did you receive a letter before action?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply DonkeyB, what is an NoA? I used the template form used a lot on this forum - what I asked in the letter was...

 

Please treat this letter as my request made under CPR 31.14 for the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of the documents mentioned in your Particulars of Claim:

 

1 the agreement. You will appreciate that in an ordinary case and by reason of the provisions of CPR PD 16 para 7.3, where a claim is based upon a written agreement, a copy of the contract or documents constituting the agreement should be attached to or served with the particulars of claim and the original(s) should be available at the hearing. Further, that any general conditions incorporated in the contract should also be attached.

 

2 the assignment

3 the default notice

4 the termination notice

5 any other documents you intend to rely on in court

Is there anything else I should have asked for?

I acknowledged 10th June 2011 on the online system.

I had received many letters threatening court action but was advised on the DCA forum on here to ignore them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

NoA = notice of assignment, as mentioned in your CPR request and their claim!

 

It’s important that you understand what you’re asking for. That’s why I posted the links to the explanatory threads.

 

Simply repeating templates without adapting them to your personal situation is dangerous, but you have been lucky in this instance.

 

Send the reminder, recorded, enclosing a copy of the original letter. Demand a response by return, or a statement to the effect that they do not have the documents in their possession.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry DonkeyB I did read your links but couldnt remember all of the terminology a week later. I shall put the letter together as you suggested and send it today via recorded delivery.

 

Many thanks for your time,

 

AngryApe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again. It is now the 23rd and I still have not received any post from the claimant after sending an urgent reminder and the original CPR 31.14 by recorded delivery. Could you please advise what my next move would be? Should I contact the court and inform them they have failed to pass details of the POC or do I launch my defence stating they have failed to contact me?

 

Many thanks,

 

AngryApe

Link to post
Share on other sites

There’s nothing much else you can do except enter a defence based on having little or no understanding of the claim as it is so vague, with a request that the claim be struck out due to non-compliance with CPR. Alternatively, you can spend £40/£75 to apply to have the case struck out because the PoC is utter bow-larks.

 

When does your defence have to be in by? What was the date on the claim form? Add 32 days to the issue date.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again DonkeyB for your continued help.

 

Issue date: 06/06/11

 

So I believe the last possible date for defence is 4pm 11/07/11 (according the the court helpdesk line).

 

Is there any special way of wording my defence - court "prose" or anything?

 

Many thanks,

 

AngryApe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let’s wait a little while to see if there is any response to CPR. Jon’s advice is spot on, but you could ask for a similar order at the AQ stage without any cost – however, the judge may not grant your order, and that’s a bit of a lottery.

 

Why not phone Drydens and ask where the CPR is? Record the call if you can, but do not enter into any conversation about the alleged debt or the case itself. Any such contact can be difficult to make, but it should not frighten you, and you are showing to the court you are trying to resolve the issue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...