Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
    • Thanks a lot.  I did read every single post and though the process was fairly clear at a high level, I just wanted to be sure in the areas a posted. Call it first time nerves, going down this route.  Thanks again.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Liability orders, incorrect names and other adventures in council tax...Help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4705 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, Just wondering if I could get a bit of advice.

 

Its a very very long story but to cut it short my husband and I are having massive trouble with our council in regards to his council tax.

 

For years they were sending the council tax bills in an incorrect name. My husband and I were going through a bit of a rough patch and he moved out and had a tenancy agreement that proved that he was living else where. They refused to look at that because it was a different name than the one they had. We tried and tried and tried to tell them they had the wrong name and offered to show them his passport, birth certificate, tax documents...well just about everything official, but they just were not interested. They kept sending bailiffs round despite the fact that all liability notices have not got the correct name on. I have spoken to a couple of bailiffs who have stated that they cannot collect if the name in incorrect and they have actually been (and it burns me to say this), quite helpful.

 

Now, I launched a DPA complaint as the council have been aware since 2008 (yep thats how long its been going on) that they have his name incorrect and that they have been standing in his way of proving why he doesn't owe all the money that they say he does. The council tax department were forced to changed the name on the account, but only moving forward and not retrospectively (which means that despite the fact that they acknowledge that they have the wrong name, they are still sending bailiffs for someone that effectively doesn't exist). This has gone to the information commissioner as a complaint and they said that they do believe that there is a case to be answered, so we are just waiting for there decision.

 

Now, the council have sent a bill in my husbands correct name, which would be all well and good if he hadn't left the country in January and he is no longer a UK resident (the bill is only for after the time he left). I have told the council that he has left the country and even gave them details of when and where he flew out of so they can check but guess whats just come through the door...a liability notice. Now can they even issue a liability notice in someone who is no longer in the country and would they be allowed to chase his out side the UK for a bill that he's not actually liable for. I am assuming that any liability orders that have been made in the incorrect name are none enforceable in court and that they wouldn't be able to cross boarders, would someone please clarify this for me.

 

The council even tried to apply an attachment of earnings order on my husband when he was still in the UK and falsified documents (all of which we have) to give the impression that they had a liability order in the correct name, it was only when my husbands boss questioned if they had a liability order in his name, they admitted that they didn't, but said that it didn't matter because they believed that it was him. Can they do this legally, as far as I can see you can believe anything you wish doesn't make it right or legal and if they are saying that they do believe its him, why would they not change just change the name and allow him to pay the correct amount of council tax owing?

 

I feel like I am being bullied and harassed by the council tax office, while all this was going on I advised them to turn it down a notch as I was looking after my terminally ill mother... there response was to send bailiffs round three times the week my mum died. I should have been considered vunrable but they just didn't give a toss.

 

Now he's gone, I just want to be left alone, but yet there are more threats of bailiffs coming round to the house.

 

Any and all advice will be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you made a formal complaint to the CEO of the council which isn't as strange as it sounds most councils don't administrate there own council tax so back office staff don't work directly for the council and unless you make a formal complaint the CEO the council may not know whats going on with your account

 

what council is it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have complained to the CEO's office numerous times, I have even spoken to the assistant treasurer. No one is interested.

 

I made a complaint to the LGO and they have said that they fully believe that they have got my husbands name wrong and that the liability orders can not be enforced, but the council were right to chase him with that name as that was the info that they had!!!!!!! I also do not belive that the LGO's ruling makes any sence as we were telling the council from 2008 that they had the wrong info and offered to prove it but they declinded, so how can they state that the council were right in what they did. For there argument to hold any water, then the council would have has to be compleatly unaware that there were any possible issue, but they were, they just chose to ignore it, they clearly did nothing to investigate. Mind you, from what I have since learnt about the LGO, I am unsupprised by their ridiculous ruling

 

I honestly do not know where to go from here, even if my information commissioners complaint comes back in our favour, they are just going to obtain liability orders in his correct name even though he is no longer here. They will keep harassing me. I just don't know how to make them see that he is no longer in the country. I have provided them with all of the details when he left, I cannot do any more. Is there any kind of legal action that I can take against them to just leave me alone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...