Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. And, I also continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Will i go to jail for benefit fraud


manufan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4707 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

im being pulled in as someone has reported me for letting my ex husband stay at my address

 

for a recent period of 7 weeks i let my ex husband stay with me while i was in hospital and the few weeks i was getting better. i will admit to this as i had no choice he had to stay in my home as i have children with him that need looking after. but what im worried about is that they think im living with him in a relationship which is soo untrue and when hes stayed here he has bunked up in my childrens room and theres no eotional or pysical relationship its purley for help with the children as one of the children is disabled and needs help that i cannot manage with. over the years he has shared homes with friends he no longer has contant with or sleeping with parents / sleeping rought and a 6 month flat tenancy i cannot prove he hasnt been with me will thay asumme he has lived with me all the years? i dont know what to do

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. I don't know how much money is involved, but prison is not common for benefit fraud.

 

If you have time, please read around the forum. This crops up all the time and if you read how other people have had the same problem and come through it, you should feel better and have some idea how to deal with this. In some cases, telling the truth is all it takes.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site.

From what you say you have some very good mitigating circumstances.

They will undoubtedly be looking at the information they have been given,and are likely to go into this with a fairly good idea.

Just be open and co-operate.

There is a big difference between those who deliberately commit benefit fraud and those who have broken some rules because their circumstances were a factor.

You should not lose sleep or worry about the possibility of Prison-this is something that is only given in extreme cases or repeat offenders where there are large amounts involved.

You do not appear to come over as someone who was out to deliberately defraud.

The fact that you came here to ask for advice demonstrates that you have concerns.

No one can say exactly that penalties will be imposed,but that answering questions honestly,and being able to satisfy them of what you tell here,it will certainly help with any action they may feel is needed.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you can prove he doesn't live with you then that will help alot. If he can get statements from the people he has stayed with and a copy of the tenancy agreement he had then that's enough to prove he wasn't living with you at those times. Also if he writes a statement confirming he isn't living with you and giving the addresses of the places he was staying will help x

Link to post
Share on other sites

i asked him has he used my address and he said yes he has used my address he never changed his bank details because it was apprently more secure but i never had any statements come here so i never knew . things he has used it for are contract phone i was totally un aware of this and job appliacations ;-( .. i have alway known that debt letters for his old debt from back when were were married have come here but i alway just chucked them away as he wasnt here i have phoned the companys few times to say he moved on but they continue to send them so i just chucked them away

 

i cannot get any statements from people he was living with as they have all moved on now ;-( no mail to prove he was living there nothin ;-(over the years i have let him bunk up here with the kids when hes been desperate as ive felt sorry for him and hes the father of my kids but i dont know what i can do to prove we were not living as a married couple as from anyone looking on the outside it would look like we were at times but behind closed doors we deffo was no married couple its all a show for the kids i thought i was doing right my kids trying to keep him close to them now im going to be penaliseed ;-(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...