Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Third party HASNT REPORTED CLAIM Please help ( CAR OFFROAD)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4710 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

Somebody hit the driver side rear of my car when i was stationary at a traffic light.

I got a quote and was too expensive for him to repair so went to an accident management as im only third party and claiming off his insurance company.

 

Im pretty sure he wasnt insured properly as he was adament not to go through insurance, the car was insured at the time of the accident.

 

Its been a month now and accident management company said he cancelled his policy a week after the accident and is not responding to his insurance company so his insurance company are investigating. (BUT HE WAS INSURED AT THE TIME)

I have inpdependent witnesses that saw it ( middle of town) who filled in forms and have lots a pictures with the driver and witnesses in the pictures.They have sent this + car repair estimates to the other insurer

 

I read that even if he wasnt insured properly they have to act as an article 75 insurer.. The accident management company wont give me a hire because its not straight forward (hes not responding)

My cars in the garage just waiting for liability before repairing ( engineers report already done)

Its been over a month now and hes not responding (i dont think he ever will)

 

UPDATE

today the solicitor told me they passed it on to the liabilty team

What does this mean?

 

 

Are they obliged to pay up?

 

please help

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they are obliged to pay, as evidence of their policyholders liability has been provided. By the sounds of it, the 3rd party Insurers are getting ready to make the relevant payments. Or it could be that they will be probing liability further. Personally I think they should be forced (court action if necessary) to get on with it and if they have a problem with their policyholder they should sort it out after.

 

It sounds like the 3rd party driver had reason to take flight. Was there a discrepancy with the details they provided to the Insurer when they arranged the policy ? Was the driver the actual policyholder or just someone borrowing the car ? Was this a case of fronting i.e a younger main driver, using mum and dad to Insure their car to obtain cheaper Insurance. Whatever the reason, they were hiding something, which they did not want their Insurers to know about. This is not your problem, so your accident management company should start acting a bit more forceably if they don't gain movement.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought this was the case, thank you very much

They are calling them on tuesday for a response, hopefully they will have a decision by then

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought this was the case, thank you very much

They are calling them on tuesday for a response, hopefully they will have a decision by then

 

 

 

I forgot to say he cancelled his policy 1 week after the accident that's why they said they have issues with paying

Surely this shouldnt matter as it was insured at the time?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to say he cancelled his policy 1 week after the accident that's why they said they have issues with paying

Surely this shouldnt matter as it was insured at the time?

 

No you didn't forget. Either you were tired or couldn't read through beer goggles.

 

Does not make a difference, as they were still Insured at the time. It is just a pain for their Insurers as their policyholder is on the run, so they can't find out their story. I suspect that the 3rd party Insurers will investigate their policyholder futher and even threaten legal proceedings against them. Not that this should affect you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The solicitor phoned the third party insurance today and they said they havnt reviewed it yet... its waiting to be reviewed

I asked to issue court proceedings but they apparently have 90 days ( its been 45) before any legal proceedings can be issued

 

I am getting really frustrated and feel there is nothing i can do

Link to post
Share on other sites

The solicitor phoned the third party insurance today and they said they havnt reviewed it yet... its waiting to be reviewed

I asked to issue court proceedings but they apparently have 90 days ( its been 45) before any legal proceedings can be issued

 

I am getting really frustrated and feel there is nothing i can do

 

 

That is correct, the third party insurers have 3 months under the pre-action protocol in which to investigate that claim so there is nothing you can do for another 45 days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...