Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car broke down 4 days after purchase, I want my money back!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4723 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi. Is there anyone out there who can help??

 

I bought a 55 reg Ford Mondeo LX diesel from a second hand dealer. The next day black smoke started coming out when i put my foot on the accelarator. 4 days after purchase we took the car out for a drive on the motorway for the first time and the glow plug warning light came on, we lost power but managed to limp off of the motorway, lots and lots of steam started coming out of the back and we broke down on a busy A-road with my young baby in the back. We had to be towed home by RAC. As it was a sunday afternoon we had to wait until the next morning to contact the dealer, her told us to contact the warrenty co and they told us to take it into a garage for a diagnostic my dad towed me to a local Ford dealership. Ford diagnosed the problem a a worn turbo and possible further engine damage which couldn't be determined until the turbo had been fixed. The warrenty co had rejected the claim because Ford have said it's clearly an existing condition (have this in writing form the warrenty co and Ford will be providing us a diagnostic report stating that it's an existing condition). We've spoken to Consumer Direct for advice and told the dealer we want to reject the car and have a refund (either my old car returned plus the £950 we paid on top, or else the total cost of the Mondeo, £3250). He told us that because he's being, in his words, "helpful" in trying to get the car fixed (which he's not, he's just trying to push the warrenty co to pay so he doesn't have to) that he doesn't have to give us a refund. We've put in in writing to him that we want a refund and are now playing the waiting game.

 

Can anyone give any advice please? As I've said I have a young baby at home and being without a car is very stressfull. I just feel like we've been conned.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The warranty is irrelevant here. You claim ia against the seller and as already pointed out, you should reject but you will need to put it in writing and send by recorded delivery. Come back if you need further help.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must first give him a chance to repair the car for you. You cannot automatically reject the car. You can expect a loan car while yours is being repaired. Most reputable traders will do this for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must first give him a chance to repair the car for you. You cannot automatically reject the car. You can expect a loan car while yours is being repaired. Most reputable traders will do this for you.

 

Yet again duff advice.

 

The car obviously has a major mechanical problem which, after just 4 days of ownership, is rejectable. However, yes, the OP could demand a repair if he so chooses but from his description, I would advise he rejects.

 

Consult Trading Standards for clarification of the SOGA OP to clarify the advice given in posts 3 & 4.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here we go again!!!!!!!!!

 

Need the Dragon on this one me thinks!!

 

Warranty will not be valid as there is usually a delay between point of sale and when it comes into affect. And.......the warranty is not a warranty but an insurance policy sold as a warranty. The two are disticntly different.

 

Something again the OFT needs to clamp down on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sam you will find the period of time at which point a person can reject a car has not been dictated in law. For instance the car may of travelled 500 miles in that 4 days. The seller may well agree to refund but could argue that in 500 miles the OP had opportunity to discover any major faults. But it is a grey area as to specifics in law and does need clearer guidance from SOGA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Need the Dragon on this one me thinks!!

 

 

You called? :)

 

Car was faulty at point of sale. Reject the car under the sale of goods act. Car is not fit for purpose bought. Ideally get the car back onto their premises and hand them the keys. Make an exact note of the time and date and ideally take a witness with you.

 

Having done that, give him 14 days to refund your money in full making it clear that are rejecting the car and will not accept a repair. Mark your letter 'Letter before action'.

 

If you don't receive your refund or a promise of such within 14 days, issue a CC summons immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , thanks for all the responses!

 

I like Dragons suggestion but unfortunatley the car isn't roadworthy and it's a bit of a distance (7 miles)to go on tow, especially as I found it so scary being on tow just the short distance to the Ford garage! In answer to some of the questions and comments, it was the first time I'd driven the car any distance and even then I didn't get all that far, probably got 40 miles before breaking down. Before that I'd only used it to pop to supermarket 2 miles away, that sort of short trip. There is no HP. I have sent him a letter by recorded delivery saying I reject and want a full refund and am waiting for a response.

 

The car broke down on 8th May. I've been on a website called "Sale of Goods Act Hub" and now have a better understanding of consumer law. A lot of people have said that he probably think he can bully me because I'm a woman but I'm going to hold my ground! Just hoping this is all sorted out before out holiday which we need a car for, otherwise will have to hire a car.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the car is un-driveable, did you indicate this in your rejection letter? I would of put something like; 'it is available to collect at your conveinence'. After all, if they had sold it correctly, it wouldn't of been un-driveable now would it?

 

If you do find yourself hiring a car, you may be able to claim the cost back under 'consiquentail losses' should you have to take the matter to court.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...