Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, We bought a part to fix our washing machine approx 13 months ago direct from the manufacturer of the washing machine via phone. This part then failed 13 months later, as confirmed by their own engineer, who was sent by the manufacturer (who is also the retailer for the part) FoC. The engineer actually installed a replacement part, the machine came back to life, but they then removed the part used for testing (and ours reinstalled) as "we would be charged for it". The retailer are refusing to replace the part, stating that they only warranty parts for 90 days. When I stated that I believed the Consumer Rights Act gives me longer than that, they insinuated that it did not, and this was repeated by many representatives. AIUI for goods bought more than 6 months ago, I need to get an engineers report to confirm the part has failed? Or that it has failed due to manufacturing issues? Or would the companies own engineers report suffice? Also, does anyone have any other decent contact details for Hotpoint (or the Whirlpool group)? Thanks, GH
    • Thank you for that "read me", It's a lot to digest, lots of legal procedure. There was one thing that I was going to mention to you,  but in one of the conversations in that thread it was mentioned that there may be spies on the Forum,  this is something that I've read quite some time ago in a previous thread. What I had in mind was to wait for the thirty days after their reply to my CCA request and then send the unenforceable letter. I was hoping that an absence of signature could be the Silver Bullet but it seems that there are lot of layers to peel on this Onion.  
    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Notice of transfer of proceedings


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4168 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI

Ive got a letter saying notice of transfer of proceedings on the top left.

It states Claimant - arrow global

defendant u.

 

Then all it says is

 

To all parties

This claim has been transferred to the the king's Lynn County Court for enforcement.

 

 

That is it no forms attached, nothing, this already has a CCJ , payments are all up to date.

 

Does anyone know why I have got this letter.

 

It is not asking anywhere to respond so I am a bit confused and very worried.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it have nothing else, ie, appeals to make (outrageous levels, normally) a payment of some sort, or an invitation to call someone ? This seems really quite peculiar, hopefully some other peeps can shed some light on this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No nothing atall just this one sentence where you would expect instructions

 

"This claim has been transferred to the the king's Lynn County Court for enforcement. "

 

does this mean " to enforce " or it has been transferred to the NAME of " kings county court for enforcement" meanin they have just transferred the admin files.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this your local CC?

This appears to me to be that a judgement has been obtained by default, probably through the Northampton County Court Bulk center and

the claimant is seeking a distress warrant for what ever is owing ie they will be authorising bailiffs to act.

You say that all payments are up to date, sometimes there is a delay in funds reaching the account and the some DCA's will throw their

toys out and seek enforcement.

For a start phone Kings Lynn CC on Monday and ask what occuring.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have not had a single letter to advise of late payments , delay in payments or anything like that so i dont understand.

 

There is no advice of a court date or to fill in anything , just this message?

 

 

Thanks

 

Ruth

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to phone Kings Lynn court asap tomorrow as this smells like a judgement in default, is it possible that document could have

been sent to a previous address?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for coming back to me.

 

I have never received any letters to say I am behind with any payments any warnings etc just this plain letter.

 

Wouldnt they ask me to fill a form in and on the letter state it is going back to court?

 

It is just strange a one line sentence without any further instructions as to what is happening?

 

I have lived at this address for 15 years so no nothing would have gone anywhere else, and as far as I am aware the payments are up to date.

 

The CCJ was applied in March 2008 a payment was agreed by variation order by Northampton Court and I have had no responses from the company since ive just been paying.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah could be the swines are looking to get a a change to the payments,was there codicil saying that could apply for anything like that?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this court headed paper and is there a case reference?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes it has come from the courts, the envelope was marked St Katherines Court and mentioned before the sentence.

 

To all parties.

 

There is a reference for the claimant and not one next to the defendants name.

 

Thanks very much I am so confused and so worried what this is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

St. Katherines House is the Northampton County Court Bulk Centre much loved by the DCA's

for sending out claims by the dozen.

If I were you Ruth I would phone NCCBC ist thing tomorrow speak to the court manager or one

of the clerks and quote the reference, you should get all the answers, when you do let us know whats on and will be back to help.

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help, I will do, was hoping someone on here had received one of these and knew what it maybe to stop me worring.

 

THanks for all your help will let you know when i find out.

 

Thanks

Ruth

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again Ruth I have seen quite a few of these often the claimant will want to move a case

out to the defendants local court and there are dozens of reasons that there could be mostly nothing to worry about!!!!!

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...