Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AXA life insurance denied due to non-diagnosed epileptic seizure 7 years previously


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4717 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone!

 

I must say, it's been a LOOOOOOOOOOOOONG time since I have been on the furums! Finished university (get results on 26th!), started working as a support worker and planning my wedding! :-) But there was an element of rubbishness and I wish I was here under better circumstances.

 

Last July, my mother's partner started to show signs of a stroke. After a dash to the hospital, he was told it wasn't, but obviously something was going on. After a few weeks of tests, he was diagnosed with a brain tumor. By this point, the tumor was apparently a 'Stage 3' - apparently the stage scale goes from 1 (Teeny) to 4 (Goodnight Vienna). He had a round of radiotherapy and chemo, both of which were unsuccessful and caused him to deteriorate further and was stopped midway. By september, he was unable to support himself and had no real means of communication. At the beginning of October, he had a morning of seizures (as is common with such brain diseases) and passed away.

 

Now, he never signed a will: he got round to almost completing one but it wasn't finished and it wasn't signed/witnessed. He and my mum were also not married, although they had the usual joint financial stuff together, which resulted in his mum, whom he had no relationship with and didn't even bother to show at his funeral, is probate... Her other son is trying to take over the estate management so it'll be easier for my mum to sort out, as she has dealt with the funeral and stuff... They have a life insurance policy with AXA (still waiting on full info and a copy of the policy) which was submitted in November 2010. They have been humming and hawing for months, about the claim, then sent a letter asking for access to his GP records. AXA got the approval and in March 2011, they denied the payout and claim 'based on a technicality'. The technicality is apparently because he had taken epilepsy meds 7 years previous to taking out the policy. He had a few random seizures years ago, and took some meds for a few years, but came off them as they made him feel awful or something... He didn't have epilepsy, he was told by doctor that it was 'idiopathic epilepsy' i.e., the catchall condition for when you show symptoms of something, but there are no signs...

 

Anyways, the claim was denied because of this, even though the neurology consultant has stated that this epilepsy drug years ago is irrelevant to his death. We are unsure if he even mentioned the non-epilepsy at the time of applying or the meds, as he did it by phone... This claim has resulted my my mother being screwed by her bank with the mortgage, and she is now being taken to court by the funeral directors due to non-payment, despite offering repeated payment plans. Ive asked her to get a dosclosure on his med records, something from Neurology to state that the meds/epilepsy issue is irrelevant, and, most importantly, a great big dirty disclosure on AXA...

 

Sorry it's sooooo long, but thought best to give as much info as I could in order to receive some much needed help. My mum has an appointment with a CAB officer next week so I'll see what happens...

 

Cheers

 

Sazz

Lloyds Current A/C DPA sent 7th May 2009 Closed and charges wiped Summer 2010.

 

Barclays A/C DPA sent 4th June 2009: no reply, no correspondence as of 2011.

 

Littlewoods Data Protection Act Section 10 sent 09/06/2006 - Fraudulent A/C closed and CRA data removed November 2006.

 

HSBC Default & Debt wiped March 2009 (6 yr Statute barred reached)

 

RBS - Claim 1 - Settled in FULL £766.00 20/06/2006.

RBS - Claim 2 - Settled in FULL £777.95 08/09/2006

 

 

BOS A/C No. 1 & 2

Amount - £586.39 claim plus 8% interest

SETTLED IN FULL 08/09/2006 - CHEQUE FOR £625.25

 

Halifax Visa Data Protection Act Disclosure Received

 

First Direct Data Protection Act Disclosure received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have alerted the site team for you.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. I've only just seen this, having been off the forums. Has anything else happened since you last posted?

 

I think it could be helpful if you would post up the wording in the policy that Axa are relying on, if they've told you. Was the epilepsy problem declared on the proposal form for the policy?

 

Please post what you can. You might also consider contacting the FSA on Monday. Someone on their helpline should be able to advise you.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sazz.

 

I've a feeling that your Mum is probably going to need specialist help with this. The only thing that I can think of is to ask the doctor to write to the insurance company to say that this is unrelated to any previous episode, as you said. However if your Mum's partner failed to disclose that there had been a problem then I have an awful feeling this will be an uphill struggle.

 

The only other thing is that she could just follow the insurance companies complaints procedure, and if she can't get a satisfactory result she could take it to the insurance ombudsman.

 

Regarding the funeral, if the family are dealing with probate perhaps they should help out or cover the cost of the funeral.

 

Regarding the lack of a will, if the insurance policy was intended for your mother, then that must be a strong argument that the intention was that everything should go to her. If the partner's share of the house goes to someone else then they need to take over payment of his share - or will his mother want to cash in on this?

 

What an awful situation for your Mum. She must be at her wits end.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to see if the policy is one of 2 ms sold back in 2004. They were fined £500,000 by the FSA, it maybe of help to read through these links:

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/library/communication/pr/2004/111.shtml

 

Full Final Notice version here:

 

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/axa_21dec04.pdf

 

Hope this helps. . .

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Everyone,

 

Many thanks for all your suggestions so far... I have just finished work and will be calling the Mumsie tomorrow, so I'll update with relevant info :) Still awaiting a copy of the policy documents too...

 

Sarah

Lloyds Current A/C DPA sent 7th May 2009 Closed and charges wiped Summer 2010.

 

Barclays A/C DPA sent 4th June 2009: no reply, no correspondence as of 2011.

 

Littlewoods Data Protection Act Section 10 sent 09/06/2006 - Fraudulent A/C closed and CRA data removed November 2006.

 

HSBC Default & Debt wiped March 2009 (6 yr Statute barred reached)

 

RBS - Claim 1 - Settled in FULL £766.00 20/06/2006.

RBS - Claim 2 - Settled in FULL £777.95 08/09/2006

 

 

BOS A/C No. 1 & 2

Amount - £586.39 claim plus 8% interest

SETTLED IN FULL 08/09/2006 - CHEQUE FOR £625.25

 

Halifax Visa Data Protection Act Disclosure Received

 

First Direct Data Protection Act Disclosure received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck,

 

These insurance companies look for technicalities....

I remember one guy got refused a payout for critical illness cover, because he didnt note on the application form that he had a big toe nail removed, due it ingrowing

 

Absolutely absurd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...