Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof? 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No    Have you had a response?  n/a 7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice'  
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

#Employment : Resigning a zero hour contract, notice & implications


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4737 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, looking for some advice and hopefully some of you lovely people can help me :)

 

Ive been working for a retailer for nearly 5 months on a zero hour contract and it has been my sole job, during the interview it was broadly aggreed that I would be on 20+ a week and I have been so, fluctuating between the mid 20s and 40.

 

I have now been offered a new job that offers me everything that my current does not and the sooner I can take it up the better for my new boss and his company, as a contract has been won and needs fulfilled. Obviously I'm eager to take the new role but don't want to leave myself open.

 

I mentioned the offer to my manager, and he informed me theres a four week notice period, my question is can I just tell him I'm now unavailible to work due to the zero hour contract not guarnateeing my availibilty to work, or will the regularity of work/agreement leave me liable possible for loss of earnings?

 

I have only taken 5 days holiday so far and was also wondering if I were to leave whether I would have these paid to me. It would be preferable for me to finish on holidays meaning I could move to the new job sooner, however I can't see this being agreed to by the managers as two of our permanent staff are also leaving to new jobs

 

I don't want to leave on bad terms as I get on with all the staff and managers however the quicker I can make the move the better.

 

Any help would be very much appreciated, cheers

bintin

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you been given a written statement of the terms & conditions of employment?

And, if so, what does that say is the period of notice you are required to give if you leave?

You would, having worked continuously for over a month, have to give at least one weeks notice.

If you have accrued holiday entitlement, you are entitled to be paid for this. Whether or not you would be entitled to take this holiday as part of your notice would again depend on your T&C's and/or it being agreed by your employer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your contract states you are not obliged to work more than 0 hours per week and they are not obliged to offer any more than 0 hours per week then you could actually do 4 weeks notice at 0 hours, simply put they ask you to work, you say sorry, i've done my contractual hours.

 

As rmd said, check your contract, if you have not received one it's a week

 

This may not be good advice though (and more me wanting to line employers working 0 hrs contracts up against a wall)

 

By doing this and starting another job at the same time (becuase you were not obliged to do any work over 0 hrs) it could cock up your tax code and put you on emergency tax i suppose, to be honest tax isn't a strongpoint for me

 

As rmd stated your entitled to accrued leave either by way of it being granted or pay in lieu of notice, it should be calculated at the average of the previous 12 weeks pay, this is another possible minefield depending on when the calculation occurs as if it's done now with your 20-40 hrs it will be significantly different than one where the last 4 weeks of the 12 are 0 hrs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the replys, it's cleared it up a bit for me.

 

Looking through the contract there is a four week notice period.

It also states that employment is on an as and when engagement and there may be periods where no hours can be offered

"this contract is classed as being part time casual. Your manager will agree hours to be worked on an ongoing basis. The company does not vomit to provide you with regular work and review the situatio depending workload.

It is therefore a condition of this offer that you understand that where the company finds it cannot provide work for you over a period of three months it reserves the right to conclude the contract"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess they'll be getting told I can't work. I was rather frightened of moving on as when I suggested just leaving my assistant manager said if I broke the contract I would e liable for loss of profits but I'm guessing thats pretty much impossible on a zero hour contract, never mind not being worth the effort!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I'd say it depends on whether it's set out in the contract or implied by precedent that you have the option of turning down any work during the 4 weeks of your notice period.

If you can say, "No thanks, I'm not available", then the contractual notice period is effectively immaterial.

But if you have to work as and when they want you, then if you turn down work during your notice period you could be held to be in breach of contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...