Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

#Employment : Resigning a zero hour contract, notice & implications


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4741 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, looking for some advice and hopefully some of you lovely people can help me :)

 

Ive been working for a retailer for nearly 5 months on a zero hour contract and it has been my sole job, during the interview it was broadly aggreed that I would be on 20+ a week and I have been so, fluctuating between the mid 20s and 40.

 

I have now been offered a new job that offers me everything that my current does not and the sooner I can take it up the better for my new boss and his company, as a contract has been won and needs fulfilled. Obviously I'm eager to take the new role but don't want to leave myself open.

 

I mentioned the offer to my manager, and he informed me theres a four week notice period, my question is can I just tell him I'm now unavailible to work due to the zero hour contract not guarnateeing my availibilty to work, or will the regularity of work/agreement leave me liable possible for loss of earnings?

 

I have only taken 5 days holiday so far and was also wondering if I were to leave whether I would have these paid to me. It would be preferable for me to finish on holidays meaning I could move to the new job sooner, however I can't see this being agreed to by the managers as two of our permanent staff are also leaving to new jobs

 

I don't want to leave on bad terms as I get on with all the staff and managers however the quicker I can make the move the better.

 

Any help would be very much appreciated, cheers

bintin

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you been given a written statement of the terms & conditions of employment?

And, if so, what does that say is the period of notice you are required to give if you leave?

You would, having worked continuously for over a month, have to give at least one weeks notice.

If you have accrued holiday entitlement, you are entitled to be paid for this. Whether or not you would be entitled to take this holiday as part of your notice would again depend on your T&C's and/or it being agreed by your employer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your contract states you are not obliged to work more than 0 hours per week and they are not obliged to offer any more than 0 hours per week then you could actually do 4 weeks notice at 0 hours, simply put they ask you to work, you say sorry, i've done my contractual hours.

 

As rmd said, check your contract, if you have not received one it's a week

 

This may not be good advice though (and more me wanting to line employers working 0 hrs contracts up against a wall)

 

By doing this and starting another job at the same time (becuase you were not obliged to do any work over 0 hrs) it could cock up your tax code and put you on emergency tax i suppose, to be honest tax isn't a strongpoint for me

 

As rmd stated your entitled to accrued leave either by way of it being granted or pay in lieu of notice, it should be calculated at the average of the previous 12 weeks pay, this is another possible minefield depending on when the calculation occurs as if it's done now with your 20-40 hrs it will be significantly different than one where the last 4 weeks of the 12 are 0 hrs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers for the replys, it's cleared it up a bit for me.

 

Looking through the contract there is a four week notice period.

It also states that employment is on an as and when engagement and there may be periods where no hours can be offered

"this contract is classed as being part time casual. Your manager will agree hours to be worked on an ongoing basis. The company does not vomit to provide you with regular work and review the situatio depending workload.

It is therefore a condition of this offer that you understand that where the company finds it cannot provide work for you over a period of three months it reserves the right to conclude the contract"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I guess they'll be getting told I can't work. I was rather frightened of moving on as when I suggested just leaving my assistant manager said if I broke the contract I would e liable for loss of profits but I'm guessing thats pretty much impossible on a zero hour contract, never mind not being worth the effort!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I'd say it depends on whether it's set out in the contract or implied by precedent that you have the option of turning down any work during the 4 weeks of your notice period.

If you can say, "No thanks, I'm not available", then the contractual notice period is effectively immaterial.

But if you have to work as and when they want you, then if you turn down work during your notice period you could be held to be in breach of contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...