Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How do I value damaged computer goods in a 100% non fault car accident?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4737 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

My first port on the forum, and I'm looking for some advice on making a claim against a 3rd party insurer.

 

I was involved in a car accident last week. I was in rush-hour stationary traffic (ie, not moving), when another driver hit me from behind. Both cars driveable. Insurance details exchanged.

 

I've called the 3rd party insurance company, and they want details of the damage done to my car and its contents.

 

Some point I'm unsure of;

 

1. Should I ask (insist?) for the 3rd party insurance company to issue a letter admitting 100% liability? Is this a letter that I have a reasonable change of receiving? If I'm not in receipt of the above before repair work starts, where do I stand if the other driver changes his story?

 

2. How do I go about claiming for the VDO Dayton Carin sat-nav system (bolted to the boot floor) and the laptop that has been damaged?

 

VDO Datyon no longer make my sat-nav system (the exact model), and there are none on auction websites. I've spoken to VDO Dayton, who say they no longer stock parts for that model as it's so old.

 

3. The (Toshiba) laptop that was damaged is quite old too, but now the screen is cracked and Toshiba no longer stock parts for it (or their authorized repairers). There is also the issue of the software that is on the laptop. The software is OEM, which means the licence is tied to the laptop. When I replace the laptop, I'll have to buy new OEM software to stay licensed - but the software versions on the laptop are no longer sold (i.e. Microsoft Office v4). I would have to buy the current version.

 

If the insurers offer a valuation based on a sliding scale related to age, I'm stuffed. The electronics have scrap value of about £50 each, but this is not going to be enough to buy any kind of replacement.

 

Do I have the right on insisting on a replacement that was electronically functional to that which was damaged by the 3rd party?

 

Finally, I cannot find the receipts for the above, as after 10 years since purchase, I generally throw away receipts after the warranty expires (just how long do you keep receipts for anyway). I might have bank records (I keep those for 20 years...) but proving that a debit entry on a bank statement was related to the exact purchase in question would be tricky.

Any advice welcomed.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are fully comprehensive it is for your insurer to sort out, so let the insurance Company deal with it. They will use an adjuster to drive down the cost if there isn't a chance of getting the money off the other insurance company, likewise if you are both insured by the same company or underwriter. The other insurance company will use an adjuster to drive down the costs as well so there is a few things you can do.

 

You will have to prove that the crash was the cause of the damage or failure and may require a 3rd party report which the insurance company can also insist upon.

 

The insurers usually work on value so you can look on the internet specifically through small adds and refurbished suppliers for an equivalent replacement value, if they say £50 but some refurb specialist has the unit at £150, then you can legitimately demand £150 it is all a question of reasonable and legitimate proof. You may also need to find original proof of purchase for the items and they may demand the items after settlement. On items that you cannot find, then you can ask the manufacturer for the equivalent recent model and look for the cost of the second hand refurbished model. This can cut 2 ways, the newer better version may be cheaper so your original cost on the sliding scale way be worth more as long as you have the original retail price or even the receipt.

 

Everybody forgets that cost of professional recovery of data from laptops with none functioning video displays and if done by a reputable company could be equivalent to the cost of a new laptop. There are also setup and installation charges as well

 

These extras give you a position to negotiate and you can choose to make an equitable settlement as long as it is within reason and legitimate.

 

You should be aware that if any of the items have been claimed for under another policy you will find yourself in big trouble unless you have declared it. Lots of electronic items are covered by household accident and there could be room for a claim there and it may be new for old. They may however try to recover part of the money from your car insurer or the 3rd party.

 

Remember that you can negotiate with insurers and don't be frightened to argue the case because at the end of the day they are looking to reduce the costs and you are looking for a fair deal.

 

I hope that this is of some use and good luck

Edited by mdfrance
Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are fully com it is for your insurer to sort out, so let the insurance Company deal with it. The other insurance compa

 

If the OP is fully comp insured then their insurers will only deal with repairs to the car, and not the SatNav or the Laptop, these are uninsured losses and the OP has to claim direct for these from the insurers of the third party.

 

The TP insurers are only liable for putting you back in the position you were in prior to the accident, so it is highly unlikely they will pay for a new laptop or a new SatNav, what they will do is offer you a cash settlement based on what you could reasonably expect to pay for a secondhand SatNav and secondhand laptop that is roughly the same age and same spec.

 

Mossycat

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your replies.

 

I now see that the cost of replacing the damaged sat-nav, and computer does not just include the hardware cost, there will be the labour cost to re-install the new sat-nav (wired into the car data bus system), and to re-install new software on the replacement laptop.

 

I've decided to seek out a chartered loss adjuster that will work on my behalf to estimate what it will cost to put me back into the same position as I was in before the crash. I will then forward this onto the 3rd part insurers who can accept or reject it.

 

If they reject the estimate, I can take the insurer to the small claims court (£25) and let them decide.

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
Thank you for your replies.

 

I now see that the cost of replacing the damaged sat-nav, and computer does not just include the hardware cost, there will be the labour cost to re-install the new sat-nav (wired into the car data bus system), and to re-install new software on the replacement laptop.

 

I've decided to seek out a chartered loss adjuster that will work on my behalf to estimate what it will cost to put me back into the same position as I was in before the crash. I will then forward this onto the 3rd part insurers who can accept or reject it.

 

If they reject the estimate, I can take the insurer to the small claims court (£25) and let them decide.

 

Thanks.

 

You have appointed a loss assessor to your claim who will be taking a cut of the claim not an adjuster.

 

I imagine the policy will be one of indemnity anyway which means putting you back into the same financial position as before.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...