Thread: Protest

Has anyone considered lawful ways to protest, and how to display your contempt for the bank without inconveniencing other bank users.

I know there was some muppet who was boasting about superglueing the bank doors locked, but I was thinking more along the lines of standing outside the branch with a placard, or even setting up one of those tables that animal rights protesters often use...

I seem to remember that in the 70s and early 80s this was very effective against companies that did business with the apartheid regime in South Africa...

And most importantly, has the law governing an individuals right to lawful protest been watered down much in the intervening years?

Similar Threads:

• OFT Protest - Who's going?
• Protest

Banks only understand money...what we are doing on this forum is probably the best form of protest.

Originally Posted by alanfromderby

Banks only understand money...what we are doing on this forum is probably the best form of protest.

Hi Alan,

I fully understand your point, but our methods are very 'behind the scenes.' Visible and vocal protest would get customers asking questions of the bank directly, would cause embarassment and fudged responses, and and put them in the position where they could not rely on an automated and faceless response mechanism...exactly the sort of publicity that people need to understand in order to realise what the bank is doing to them...

I think there is a fundimental difficulty for any campaign - namely, the media companies all have bank accounts. Whilst they will report the odd thing in an attempt to show balance , I don't think you will find any prepared to publically back a campaign.

This leaves us with the option of standing outside branches - possibly leafletting customers. Whilst this may bring some more people to the point of reclaiming fees, I doubt that the banks will take much notice - unless of course we could manage to coordinate the action to cover as many banks as possible in the same day and at the same time.

Sorry, to be so negative - but I really do feel that this forum is the only way. I would add that each day, the number of members on the forum is increasing. Banks are having to create departments specifically to deal with the claims that are being made by members of this forum. I also have no doubt that banks are paying thousands of pounds to lawyers in the hope they will find a way out of the mess.

We are hurting the banks - and each day, and each week, they are getting more rattled.

I know absolutely nothing about share dealings, however I do know that if you are a shareholder you are entltled to go to the AGM. Presumably bank shares are trading openly, so with a very small investment it should be possible to get into the meeting.

Unfortunately - expect to be ejected fairly rapidly when they sus what you are up to!

If the Labour Party can kick out one of its own members for shouting "shame" - imagine what a group of bank shareholders will do when they realise you're the reason that their profit margin is falling!!!

unless of course we could manage to coordinate the action to cover as many banks as possible in the same day and at the same time.

I was testing the water - and this was going to be the next point I would have raised. Added to the issue of AGMs, anything co-ordinated, and unexpected, will leave the banks unprepared...

Of course they have departments to deal with this issue, and that is exactly the department we DON'T want to speak to (unless they have absolute authority to refund all charges)...we want them off their guard, slipping up and admitting that the charges are penalties and unlawful.

In all honesty the suggestion was a feeler, and I don't seriously expect many people would consider it. After all, to have an impact it would have to happen during normal working hours...when most people are busy trying to earn the banks profits...

Could be a laugh - I wonder what Abbey's shares are trading at....

Originally Posted by seylectric

because of the stigma. They don't want to be seen by others in the vein of, "Hey, look at her arguing against bank charges, she must have gone overdrawn a few times, she must be struggling to make ends meet..."

Actually, that is a very fair point - rather than considering the response of the banks, the perception in the public eye could be negative...

However, it is accepted wisdom that a third of adults have charges levied against them every year, averaging £100. Assuming that everyone has had an account for at least three years, it is fair to say that everone will have suffered at some stage (on the balance of probability) - and therefore the 'shame' is a universally shared shame...

As for timidity - I think you underestimate the will of the common people, when the offence caused is so outrageous and destructive...they can and do protest. I remember well the poll tax riots and miners strike...I think the message is "if you are having your rights eroded, and you protest, you will get noticed..." and this does leave people thinking about all the issues involved...

I have spoken to numerous people about being able to reclaim charges from their bank, and the response falls into three catagories.

1) Great, how do I do it?

2) Yes, I know what you mean. I have paid hundreds of pounds in charges over the years - let me know how you get on!

3) Yes, but the banks are going to find another way of getting money out of us in the end. Probably by making everybody pay charges to cover the costs of those who can't manage their money!

Yes, the public like to see individuals standing up against the big corporations - but not when it could cost them money.

You forget:

4 - Well, surely, if you managed your money better, you wouldn't need to. After all, it's your fault you got in debt, right?

I suppose that any form of visible protest will need to be very clear on its objectives:

1. How are you doing it (is it inconvenient to others)
2. Is it a fair and just argument (duuuurrrrr!)
3. What message are you delivering to the bank (you have acted unlawfully, please rectify the situation)
4. What message are you delivering to the 'audience' (I am standing up for my right to be treated lawfully, and with respect)
5. What your resolution point is (positive action on point 3)

Whilst any publicity is great, that must NOT be the reason you are protesting (we all hate celebs who are famous for the wrong reasons...) - you are there to right a wrong, you are NOT there to become a celebrity...

Hey - good idea...we can all advertise in a tiny but incremental way. Stickers are great, but they would need explanation...however, most email accounts allow for a 'signature' - suggest people add something to the effect of:

"Fed up with being ripped off by the bank? http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk"

I'm going to do that right now...and any email I send the bank will have it there...!!! (he he)

We did stage a protest outside the OFT in March(?).

I say we, but I couldn't make it.

It was that, that spurred the OFT into stating that they were going to release a statement about a 'cap'.

When are userbase has acheived critical mass, it is our intention to go to a bank and say "Look how many potential customers you would have if you stopped profiting from charges."

If we can get one to do it, then the others would have to follow suite.

PS. I have no problem with people advertisting Pipeline ;-)

I say we, but I couldn't make it.

That means...BF?

Originally Posted by Spiceskull

Hey - good idea...we can all advertise in a tiny but incremental way. Stickers are great, but they would need explanation...however, most email accounts allow for a 'signature' - suggest people add something to the effect of:

"Fed up with being ripped off by the bank? http://www.consumeractiongroup.c o.uk"

I'm going to do that right now...and any email I send the bank will have it there...!!! (he he)

Excellent idea - I have posted a link on the other forum I spend time on (A Big Brother fan site - yes I know!!), but will now amend my footer for that.

I also trade on ebay, so may be able to add a footer to those emails as well - subject to ebay rules of course.

Indeed - and Seminole I think, and a fair few others. Stephen as well.

However, I think the protest was too early - we only had about 1000 members then.

Originally Posted by Spiceskull

That means...BF?