Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

brother and council tax summons


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4765 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

brother pays his council tax every month in cash at those paypoint machines. i know its by the 1st of each month but this month he was a day late. the 1st was a friday and he paid in cash on sat 2nd april being a saturday.

 

this morning he received a summons to the local magistrate court for an application for a liability order with £55 costs.

this shows that these liability order summons come from the council and not the court as we are talking of only a few days from payment to summons

 

WHERE DOES HE STAND WITH THIS

 

1. HE IS NOT IN AREARS, ONLY ONE DAY LATE IN MAKING THE PAYMENT

2/ WHERE DOES HE STAND WITH THE £55 COSTS ISSUE

3. WHAT ABOUT PRE ACTION PROTOCOL GOING STARIGHT IN WITH THE LIABILITY ORDER APPLICATION

4/ how can the council charge costs as the bill was paid prior to the liability order application

5/ there is no debt as that was the last payment for 2010-2011 tax year he made, dated april to april

 

i can see whats happened is that he has made the payment as i was with him when he did but the machine is late updating the council records. he paid by the paypoint operator scannng the barcode on the council tax bill.

i doubt even paying by direct debit would be a quicker method of payment

 

if it was me i would go to court and tell the magistrate that the council tax bill has been paid but need advice people

Edited by postggj
Link to post
Share on other sites

if he has cleared the summonsed debt, simply contact the council and they can cancel the summons

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

[/b][/u]1. HE IS NOT IN AREARS, ONLY ONE DAY LATE IN MAKING THE PAYMENT

2/ WHERE DOES HE STAND WITH THE £55 COSTS ISSUE

3. WHAT ABOUT PRE ACTION PROTOCOL GOING STARIGHT IN WITH THE LIABILITY ORDER APPLICATION

4/ how can the council charge costs as the bill was paid prior to the liability order application

5/ there is no debt as that was the last payment for 2010-2011 tax year he made, dated april to april

 

 

If this was his last payment for 2010/2011 then I would suspect the Council are correct in what they have done. Most Councils accept only 10 monthly instalments meaning the last should have been paid on 1 January 2011. There are some who will allow the full 12 months but even there that means it should have been paid on 1 March 2011. There is also another possibility that the monies he has paid have been put towards this years CT bill - 2011/2012. He really needs to contact the Council to see where his payment has gone, I would also suspect that sometme within the last year he has been served with a reminder - or two - that he has been late paying.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A Court Summons cannot be issued after only 1 reminder unless the amount due has not been paid within 7 days of the issuing of the reminder.

 

What I usually find (I work in a council tax dept) is that where a summons is issued so late in the year it is down to the fact that there has already been a reminder issued earlier in the year. Some councils will issue 2 reminders and a final notice but the final notice is not mandatory in all cases.

 

The council is the only one who can confirm what has happened but if he has only paid the instalments on the 1st of the month then he will not have made payment in time as the paypoint payments take 3-7 days to clear and it should be received by the council no later than the 1st of the month. There may also be an issue with him paying in march as most councils (although some will) do not give instalment schemes past january (as per the statutory instalment plan)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...