Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capital Finance One Ltd - my Problems


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4742 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I havent visited the forum for a while and hope you dont mind me "hijacking your thread" but as you are in the same boat as me I recieved the following email in regards to offering them a payment plan. Im assuming it isnt true what they are saying on the email in regards to the door step collections or Penalty charges??

 

Hi Craig,

 

Unfortunately we are unable to set up a payment plan for you, but you do need to make payments towards the account of what you can afford to help bring the balance down. Due to late payment you have to expect to pay some kind of penalty whether you have advised us of your situation or not but if you co-operate with me I am willing to negotiate about some of the fines on your account but I need your commitment and a payment to enable me to do this.

 

In regards to door to door collections, they are eligible to visit your address and do not need any permission or warrant to do this. We are able to use our door to door collections team and they are more than eligible to try and recover the full balance for us, and add on their own additional fees for making the visit. It is up to you if you want to co-operate. You have provided your work number as a contact number and we are eligible to attempt to contact you daily on all numbers you have provided to try and recover your debt. As you have an outstanding balance with us we have every right to do so and until an arrangement is made that is suitable for both of us or we receive the minimum payment (Interest) we will continue to contact you on all numbers provided as part of collections process.

 

Kind Regards

 

Nicola Coleman

 

Nicola Coleman

Total Claim £956

 

21/11/06 - Letter sent demanding charges back

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get that email to the OFT and Trading Standards IMMEDIATELY, they are grossly inflating the debt, they CANNOT let the doorstep collectors charge 'their own level of fees' and they CANNOT send them round at will, completely breaches the OFT guidelines on debt collection.

 

Get the complaint in pronto.... they are way way out of line here, you have been trying to negotiate with them but they do not want to know.

 

COMPLAIN COMPLAIN COMPLAIN

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, I shall get that sent to them tomorrow. My orignal debt was £270 which i owed them, since none payment it has gone to over £550, ive never once ignored the debt as im sure a lot of people havent, they just dont respond to emails, are they allowed to add such high fees, or penaltys as they call it??

Total Claim £956

 

21/11/06 - Letter sent demanding charges back

Link to post
Share on other sites

My initial loan was 268, now its 500. 20 a month is all theyre getting. They can pass it to who they want.....Door to door collection, if they can get past the dog in one piece ill pay the full amount :).

They are by miles the worse , everyone else is prepared to do some sort of negotiating.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Technically they are NOT allowed to add charge on charge on charge, they are SUPPOSED to allow you to negotiate, and based on the original loan amount plus one months interest seems more than fair considering the intended short term nature of the original loan.

 

They do like to try court now and again but are getting stung now people know how to defend themselves, (I've done several defences for PDL companies now and work on the basis of flawed particulars of claim, the loan history, their ultra high interest rate and charges and a plea for mediation - they do NOT want to explain their charges and interest rates in front of a judge). There is no real merit in going down the default notice route as it is not always advisable and some judges will automatically give judgement to the claimant if they see 'Default Notice' at the top of a defence. I also don't put in a lot of legal arguement as the person defending won't remember thecounter case law in court (some companies DO hire an expensive lawyer but fail on the basic arguement, high interest rate, short term nature of loan and unjust charges, not to mention onerous terms and conditions....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your helpful comment, as I said this thread wasn't started by me so I don't want to turn it all about me but I'm assuming everyone is in the same boat and receiving the same lack of communication, should I start making a standing order for what I can afford to pay them (£30 a month starting 1st May) or should I wait? As I dont want to pay this if all there going to do Is cancel out my payments with charges, also do I just pay off the original balance in the region of £300 I think or will I now have to pay £550 with all there penaltys and charges?

Total Claim £956

 

21/11/06 - Letter sent demanding charges back

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ;'rule of thumb' which has been succesful in court cases is the ORIGINAL LOAN AMOUNT plus ONE MONTHS INTEREST - any more is extortion. Just because their onerous terms and conditions state this and that does not mean that they are just. The ultra high interest rates alone do not justify all the additional charges.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...