Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Suspension of housing benefit


jadeybags
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4783 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wondered if anyone knows, are we as claimants entitled to know why housing benefit has been suspsended? And should we even be told they have been suspended?

I still keep wondering why last june my housing benefit was suspended, & I wasn't told. It was the arrears letter from the housing assosiation that alerted me to the fact it hadn't been paid, 2 weeks worth of rent.

Rang the council & the lady said it's ok, we thought there had been an over payment, but there isn't. I tried finding out more but she wasn't having any of it. She just said the housing assosiation will be paid.

I got another letter from housing assosiation saying the arrears were now even more, was about 5 weeks worth of rent by this time!

Rang council again & they said dont worry it'll be paid to them.

It was.

What I want to know is, shouldn't I have been notified my benefit had been suspended? And when I asked about it, shouldn't I have been told the details?

I asked the compliance officer about that when she came here last month & she said it's usually because too much was paid to the landlord, but that cant be right if it was them that wrote to me saying I was in arrears!

It's all weird. And has me thinking my recent over payment may have been sorted last june & cost me less if they had only been honest about stopping the benefit & why?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section C8.29 of the DWP guidance manual states that

 

"If the DM (decision-maker) decides to suspend HB, the claimant should be informed in writing. The letter should state the date of and the reason for the suspension, together with what, if anything the claimant needs to do to resolve the situation."

  • Confused 1

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When my ESA got stopped due to scoring 0 points (which has since been overturned and i was in the support group) my housing benefit also stopped, and I was not informed until my council sent me a letter asking me where my rent was. The housing benefit people, or DWP did not inform me of either stoppages, and I only found out about ESA when i had no money in my account, and housing benefit, when i had a letter after 3 weeks from the council. So yes, they should inform you, but quite often, they do not. The council then wanted me to pay rent myself until it was sorted out, when at that time, I had no income whatsoever.

From what I gathered, housing benefit is paid on a monthly basis, therefore takes longer to resolve, so yes they should inform people.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section C8.29 of the DWP guidance manual states that

 

"If the DM (decision-maker) decides to suspend HB, the claimant should be informed in writing. The letter should state the date of and the reason for the suspension, together with what, if anything the claimant needs to do to resolve the situation."

 

Cheers hun. Does that apply to Local authorities too though?

And is there any reason I wouldn't have been told at the time?

Also do you know if there is any law that states claimants should have benefit reviews at certain times? It was over 2 years ago I started working part time & came off income supoort & put in a new claim for housing benefit & the compliance officer only came out to do a review last month.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Suspension of HB/CTB claims

the quote i gave is the DWP guidance to Local Authorities who administer HB/CTB

 

the most common reasons for suspending HB/CTB is where a benefit recipient has failed to provide evidence, or information has been received which indicates that benefit is being overpaid or needs to be amended

 

in either instance the guidance is for the Local Authority to notify the suspension, not sure of why you were not notified

 

 

Review of HB/CTB claims

there is no law about how often a review of housing benefit is carried out

 

once housing benefit is awarded, it is the duty of the benefit recipient to notify changes in circumstances, the local authority does not have a duty to carry out reviews, although it is good practice to carry out focussed reviews, e.g. if there has been no changes in earnings/tax credits/pensions for a considerable period of time

If you have found my post useful, please click on the star at the bottom of my post and add some reputation points.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks folks.

So they should notify people, but quite often dont.

Great. The lunatics have taken over the asylem. The amount of their rules we have to go along with & yet they dont even follow theirs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...