Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.
The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights
a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.
just wondering has anybody had a similar letter to mine.
This has come from Cobbetts regarding my claim with the RBOS. I replied to their request for further info with a letter explaining that I found their request to be intimidating as it does not apply to small claims and only the court can request further info.
They wrote:
we note your comments on our request for further information. it is our client's contention that that your particulars of claim did not properly particularise your claim.. EG: our client can cannot properly defend a claim when you have not given details of each charge you claim is disproportinate and unreasonable.
The court is bound by an overriding objective to deal with cases justly and ensure that parties are on an equal footing. It was claerly the case that our client could not respond to your claim where you did not provide sufficient particulars. Ouyr client thereforeb objects to your allegation that the request is intinidating.
I had sent a schedule of charges so surely I have detailed the particulars of my claim. Has anybody had a similar letter. Should I be concerned???? the solicitors also have a copy of the charges. Be grateful for any advice on this one.