We had NTL television (includint sport packages) when we couldn't afford it, and fell behind with the bill - to the extent that they cut off all our TV services.

Yet they continued to charge us for the full monthly TV package.

In my mind (despite what the contract may say), this is wrong/illegal. How can they charge us for services they are not actually providing?

Now I am getting letters threatening court action if I don't pay the full amount. I think it's fair I should pay for the TV when I actually had it, but not when it was disconnected.

I've had a scout around for similar threads but couldn't find any.

Similar Threads: