Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Being Made Liable For Old Council Tax Debt At Shared Property?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4855 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, Wonder if anyone has any advice on this rather annoying situation. I've been made liable (apparently) for council tax debts relating to a property I lived in over 5 years ago. This would be fine apart from the fact the property was shared between 5 people and I was claiming council tax benefit while I lived there (to complicate matters). Somehow my name was left on the bill (I thought the bill had been paid when I moved out and didn't realise it was in my name) and bills were being sent to the old address which I never received. Eventually baliffs were brought in, found my new address and sent me letters relating to the old address. I spoke to the council and explained but they weren't much help but suggested I wrote to them and obtained tenancy contracts etc. Luckily I managed to get hold of the contracts from the estate agents we rented from and I sent them to the council explaining the situation (it was one contract for the whole house). They still weren't much help and said they wanted forwarding addresses. I only have the address of one person I shared with so I sent them that but they are still sending me bills in my name! Now it's got to a magistrate's letter. What should I do? Can I defend myself in court and get it thrown out? Should I contact the council before the court appearance and try (yet again) to get them to do the right thing? I can't afford to pay other people's debts and refuse to do so on principle. If anyone has any advice about what to do or what legal position I'm in I'd be extremely grateful. Very angry with Bham City Council over this, outrageous behaviour! Thanks.

Edited by Sciarrino
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the Council can go after anyone who lived there and who may have been liable to pay. The only decision that is made is whether or not CT was due to be paid -it's a simple yes or no answer. The fact others are involved does not come into it and yes they can make you pay the whole lot.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the Council can go after anyone who lived there and who may have been liable to pay. The only decision that is made is whether or not CT was due to be paid -it's a simple yes or no answer. The fact others are involved does not come into it and yes they can make you pay the whole lot.

 

PT

 

That's outrageous! Is there anything I can do? The bill is about £700, no way I can pay that nor will I (I'm happy to pay my share of it). Would it be worth me turning up at court to make my case? Thanks again for advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was claiming council tax benefit while I lived there (ask the council for a copy any letters sent to you regarding this benefit

ask by phone e-mail and recorded delivery letter

wouldn't it be classed as a HMO if 5 people lived there

Link to post
Share on other sites

do you if your council administrate there own council tax or do they outsource it to an agency

 

 

I know you can go to court but as plodder says the money is owing and i don't think the judge looks at anything else (could be wrong)

 

but you do not owe this debt so personally if it was me i would try and gather up as much info as you can in short space of time you have and go to court and when the judge asks if you owe this debt you can honestly say NO

Link to post
Share on other sites

Very strange. Just rang the council again and I've said the summons has been withdrawn and my name has been taken off the bill? Couldn't get a clear answer as to why but it might be because I was claiming council tax benefit for the whole period. They've put the other peoples' names on the bill but I don't know if they've got forwarding addresses etc (they were not clear on that). I asked if I'd get more bills to my address and they said no. Very odd, should be pleased but given how muddled this all is I wouldn't be surprised if I got another summons again. Also confused as to why they haven't sent a letter telling me the summons has been withdrawn. What a mess. Any advice about what I should do? Nothing? Or ask for some written confirmation etc?

Link to post
Share on other sites

^ Not if they all were on the same contract. If it were a HMO then all the tenants would have seperate tenancy agreements and it would be the landlord who is paying the CT, not the tenant IIRC.

 

Sciarrino - Unfortunately there isn't anything you can do about it. You were all jointly liable therefore you are all equally liable to pay the whole balance. There is no point in turning up at court because it won't change the fact that you lived there and your name was on the bill, which is all the courts are there to ascertain.

 

One thing to check out is the period which the bill covers - make sure it only covers the period that is stated on your tenancy agreement/when you were living there, because obviously you don't pay it when you're not liable. Have you mentioned to the council that you were on council tax benefit? That may possibly work in your favour but if the council can only get hold of you then they are totally within their rights to chase just you for it. FWIW they won't make you pay the whole amount in one go, you'll be able to pay it off in instalments.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

they have either decided its a HMO or they have looked and can see that you were in receipt of council tax benefit therefore not responsible

 

however because you are attached to that house you name may come up again especially when it gets passed to the bailiffs

In your position i would send an e-mail and recorded delivery letter asking for written confirmation within 7 days of receipt of e-mail/letter if you don't get it get on the phone to them and e-mail them everyday till you have it in writing that you do not owe council tax for (address) for the dates xxxxx

 

print a few copy's and keep them handy put the original away safely you may need in years to come

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

In your position i would send an e-mail and recorded delivery letter asking for written confirmation within 7 days of receipt of e-mail/letter if you don't get it get on the phone to them and e-mail them everyday till you have it in writing that you do not owe council tax for (address) for the dates xxxxx

 

print a few copy's and keep them handy put the original away safely you may need in years to come

 

Some Councils are notorious for saying they have withdrawn and say you don't need go to Court etc. Next thing you know is your local "thug" turning up and threatening all sorts. This is why HW's advice is so invaluable.

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they have either decided its a HMO or they have looked and can see that you were in receipt of council tax benefit therefore not responsible

 

The receipt of CTB would not remove someones liability for council tax - they are still jointly liable regardless of claiming CTB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems odd that they would remove you from the bill if you were living there, regardless of your benefit entitlement (although this certainly makes the situation more complicated!), which is why I strongly agree with hallowitch and ploddertom to definitely get confirmation of the summons withdrawal in writing. Like ploddertom said, I wouldn't put it past them to suddenly start trying to chase you for it again.

 

Not if they all were on the same contract. If it were a HMO then all the tenants would have seperate tenancy agreements and it would be the landlord who is paying the CT, not the tenant IIRC.

 

AH so thats the diffrence :-)

Aye :) it's because in a HMO each tenant is renting their room independently from the other tenants, rather than renting the whole house together. Edited by Nobnob
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...